1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Evans syndrome in adults: an observational multicenter study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Key Points

          • Adult ES is a rare, often severe, and potentially fatal condition.

          • ES is marked by frequent relapses, high therapy burden, and increased risk of infection/thrombosis, significantly affecting survival.

          Visual Abstract

          Abstract

          Evans syndrome (ES) is a rare condition, defined as the presence of 2 autoimmune cytopenias, most frequently autoimmune hemolytic anemia and immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) and rarely autoimmune neutropenia. ES can be classified as primary or secondary to various conditions, including lymphoproliferative disorders, other systemic autoimmune diseases, and primary immunodeficiencies, particularly in children. In adult ES, little is known about clinical features, disease associations, and outcomes. In this retrospective international study, we analyzed 116 adult patients followed at 13 European tertiary centers, focusing on treatment requirements, occurrence of complications, and death. ES was secondary to or associated with underlying conditions in 24 cases (21%), mainly other autoimmune diseases and hematologic neoplasms. Bleeding occurred in 42% of patients, mainly low grade and at ITP onset. Almost all patients received first-line treatment (steroids with or without intravenous immunoglobulin), and 23% needed early additional therapy for primary refractoriness. Additional therapy lines included rituximab, splenectomy, immunosuppressants, thrombopoietin receptor agonists, and others, with response rates >80%. However, a remarkable number of relapses occurred, requiring ≥3 therapy lines in 54% of cases. Infections and thrombotic complications occurred in 33% and 21% of patients, respectively, mainly grade ≥3, and correlated with the number of therapy lines. In addition to age, other factors negatively affecting survival were severe anemia at onset and occurrence of relapse, infection, and thrombosis. These data show that adult ES is often severe and marked by a relapsing clinical course and potentially fatal complications, pinpointing the need for high clinical awareness, prompt therapy, and anti-infectious/anti-thrombotic prophylaxis.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Standardization of terminology, definitions and outcome criteria in immune thrombocytopenic purpura of adults and children: report from an international working group.

          Diagnosis and management of immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) remain largely dependent on clinical expertise and observations more than on evidence derived from clinical trials of high scientific quality. One major obstacle to the implementation of such studies and in producing reliable meta-analyses of existing data is a lack of consensus on standardized critical definitions, outcome criteria, and terminology. Moreover, the demand for comparative clinical trials has dramatically increased since the introduction of new classes of therapeutic agents, such as thrombopoietin receptor agonists, and innovative treatment modalities, such as anti-CD 20 antibodies. To overcome the present heterogeneity, an International Working Group of recognized expert clinicians convened a 2-day structured meeting (the Vicenza Consensus Conference) to define standard terminology and definitions for primary ITP and its different phases and criteria for the grading of severity, and clinically meaningful outcomes and response. These consensus criteria and definitions could be used by investigational clinical trials or cohort studies. Adoption of these recommendations would serve to improve communication among investigators, to enhance comparability among clinical trials, to facilitate meta-analyses and development of therapeutic guidelines, and to provide a standardized framework for regulatory agencies.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            American Society of Hematology 2019 guidelines for immune thrombocytopenia

            Despite an increase in the number of therapies available to treat patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), there are minimal data from randomized trials to assist physicians with the management of patients. These evidence-based guidelines of the American Society of Hematology (ASH) are intended to support patients, clinicians, and other health care professionals in their decisions about the management of ITP. In 2015, ASH formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel that included 8 adult clinical experts, 5 pediatric clinical experts, 2 methodologists with expertise in ITP, and 2 patient representatives. The panel was balanced to minimize potential bias from conflicts of interest. The panel reviewed the ASH 2011 guideline recommendations and prioritized questions. The panel used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, including evidence-to-decision frameworks, to appraise evidence (up to May 2017) and formulate recommendations. The panel agreed on 21 recommendations covering management of ITP in adults and children with newly diagnosed, persistent, and chronic disease refractory to first-line therapy who have non–life-threatening bleeding. Management approaches included: observation, corticosteroids, IV immunoglobulin, anti-D immunoglobulin, rituximab, splenectomy, and thrombopoietin receptor agonists. There was a lack of evidence to support strong recommendations for various management approaches. In general, strategies that avoided medication side effects were favored. A large focus was placed on shared decision-making, especially with regard to second-line therapy. Future research should apply standard corticosteroid-dosing regimens, report patient-reported outcomes, and include cost-analysis evaluations.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Competing risks in epidemiology: possibilities and pitfalls.

              In studies of all-cause mortality, the fundamental epidemiological concepts of rate and risk are connected through a well-defined one-to-one relation. An important consequence of this relation is that regression models such as the proportional hazards model that are defined through the hazard (the rate) immediately dictate how the covariates relate to the survival function (the risk). This introductory paper reviews the concepts of rate and risk and their one-to-one relation in all-cause mortality studies and introduces the analogous concepts of rate and risk in the context of competing risks, the cause-specific hazard and the cause-specific cumulative incidence function. The key feature of competing risks is that the one-to-one correspondence between cause-specific hazard and cumulative incidence, between rate and risk, is lost. This fact has two important implications. First, the naïve Kaplan-Meier that takes the competing events as censored observations, is biased. Secondly, the way in which covariates are associated with the cause-specific hazards may not coincide with the way these covariates are associated with the cumulative incidence. An example with relapse and non-relapse mortality as competing risks in a stem cell transplantation study is used for illustration. The two implications of the loss of one-to-one correspondence between cause-specific hazard and cumulative incidence should be kept in mind when deciding on how to make inference in a competing risks situation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Blood Adv
                Blood Adv
                bloodoa
                Blood Advances
                Blood Advances
                American Society of Hematology (Washington, DC )
                2473-9529
                2473-9537
                28 December 2021
                16 December 2021
                : 5
                : 24
                : 5468-5478
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Hematology Unit, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy;
                [2 ]Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy;
                [3 ]Centre de Référence Maladies Rares sur les Cytopénies Auto-Immunes de l’Adulte, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Henri Mondor, Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil Université Paris-Est Créteil, Paris, France;
                [4 ]Department of Hematology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark;
                [5 ]Hospital Universitario Principe de Asturias (Alcala de Henares), Madrid, Spain;
                [6 ]Institute of Hematology “L. e A. Seragnoli”, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy;
                [7 ]Ematologia, Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia, Italy;
                [8 ]Department of Translational Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria “Maggiore della Carità”, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy;
                [9 ]Dipartimento di Ematologia e Oncologia, Niguarda Cancer Center, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Ospedale Niguarda, Milan, Italy;
                [10 ]Servicio de Hematología, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, Seville, Spain;
                [11 ]Clinical Haematology, Barts Health National Health Service Trust, Queen Mary University, London, United Kingdom;
                [12 ]Epidemiology Unit, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy;
                [13 ]Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam–Sanquin Landsteiner Laboratory, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
                [14 ]Department of Hematology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; and
                [15 ]Servicio de Hematología, Hospital Universitario de Burgos, Burgos, Spain
                Author notes

                Data not presented within the manuscript will be available by e-mail to the corresponding author upon reasonable request: bruno.fattizzo@ 123456unimi.it .

                Correspondence: Bruno Fattizzo, Department of Oncology and Onco-hematology, University of Milan, via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122, Milan, Italy; e-mail bruno.fattizzo@ 123456unimi.it .
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0857-8379
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9349-1627
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4478-1297
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4415-2906
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9083-855X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8935-3843
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2082-0738
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8905-0220
                Article
                2021/ADV2021005610
                10.1182/bloodadvances.2021005610
                8714709
                34592758
                9bd100e2-c9a6-4383-98d5-c42c6b8731ae
                © 2021 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) , permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.
                History
                : 23 June 2021
                : 10 August 2021
                : 30 September 2021
                Page count
                Pages: 11
                Categories
                20
                27
                28
                Platelets and Thrombopoiesis

                Comments

                Comment on this article