0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Enhancing Prostate Cancer Detection Accuracy in Magnetic Resonance Imaging–targeted Prostate Biopsy: Optimizing the Number of Cores Taken

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Take Home Message

          Identification of the optimal number for target biopsy requires a balance between minimizing sampling errors and ensuring comprehensive cancer detection, tailored to individual patient and prostate characteristics.

          Abstract

          Background and objective

          The shift toward targeted biopsy (TBx) aims at enhancing prostate cancer (PCa) detection while reducing overdiagnosis of clinically insignificant disease. Despite the improved ability of TBx in identifying clinically significant PCa (csPCa), the optimal number and location of targeted cores remain unclear. This review aims to assess the optimal number of prostate biopsy magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted cores to detect csPCa.

          Methods

          A narrative literature search was conducted using PubMed, focusing on studies published between January 2014 and January 2024, addressing factors influencing targeted core numbers during prostate biopsy. The search included both retrospective and prospective studies, prioritizing those with substantial sample sizes and employing terms such as “prostate biopsy”, “mpMRI”, “core number”, and “cancer detection”.

          Key findings and limitations

          Two biopsy cores identified csPCa in 55–65% of cases. This detection rate improved to approximately 90% when the number of cores was ≥5. The inclusion of perilesional and systematic biopsies could maximize the detection of csPCa (from 10% to 45%), especially in patients under active surveillance or with prior negative biopsy results, although there is an increase in the overdiagnosis of indolent tumors (from 4% to 20%). Transperineal software-assisted target prostate biopsy may enhance cancer detection, particularly for tumors located at the apex/anterior part of the prostate. Increasing the number of TBx cores may incrementally raise the risk of complications (by 2–14% with each added core) and result in severe pain and significant discomfort for up to 17% and 25% of TBx patients, respectively. However, the overall rate and severity of these complications remain within acceptable limits.

          Conclusions and clinical implications

          The optimal number of cores for targeted prostate biopsies should balance minimizing sampling errors with effective cancer detection and should be tailored to each patient’s unique prostate characteristics. Up to five cores per MRI target may be considered to enhance the detection of csPCa, with adjustments based on factors such as prostate and lesion volume, Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System, biopsy techniques, complications, patient discomfort, and anxiety.

          Patient summary

          In this report, we found that increasing the number of biopsy cores up to ≥5 improves the detection rates of significant prostate cancer significantly to around 90%. Although inclusion of nearby and systematic biopsies enhances detection, increasing the biopsy count may lead to higher risks of complications and indolent tumors. A customized biopsy approach based on multiple variables could be helpful in determining the appropriate number of targeted biopsies on a case-by-case basis.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis

          Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), with or without targeted biopsy, is an alternative to standard transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy for prostate-cancer detection in men with a raised prostate-specific antigen level who have not undergone biopsy. However, comparative evidence is limited.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Why and Where do We Miss Significant Prostate Cancer with Multi-parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging followed by Magnetic Resonance-guided and Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men?

            Knowledge of significant prostate (sPCa) locations being missed with magnetic resonance (MR)- and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsy (Bx) may help to improve these techniques.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Prostate Biopsy-related Infection: A Systematic Review of Risk Factors, Prevention Strategies, and Management Approaches.

              A systematic review to identify risk factors for prostate biopsy-related infection, preventative strategies, and optimal management of infectious complications was conducted. Significant risk factors for postbiopsy infection include urogenital infection, antibiotic use, international travel, hospital exposure, bacteriuria, previous transrectal biopsy, and resistance of fecal flora to antibiotic prophylaxis (especially fluoroquinolones). Patients at risk may benefit from an adjusted biopsy protocol comprising transrectal biopsy under targeted prophylaxis, and/or the use of rectal disinfection techniques or using a transperineal approach. Management of biopsy-related infection should be based on individual risk and local resistance profiles with input from multiple specialties.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Eur Urol Open Sci
                Eur Urol Open Sci
                European Urology Open Science
                Elsevier
                2666-1691
                2666-1683
                24 June 2024
                August 2024
                24 June 2024
                : 66
                : 16-25
                Affiliations
                [a ]Urology Clinic, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
                [b ]Department of Medicine - DIMED, University of Padua, Italy
                [c ]Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
                [d ]Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
                [e ]Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
                [f ]Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
                [g ]Department of Surgical Sciences, Division of Urology, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
                [h ]Department of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
                [i ]Department of Urology, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
                [j ]Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
                [k ]Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
                [l ]Department of Urology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
                [m ]Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
                [n ]Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
                [o ]Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author. Urology Clinic, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy. Tel. +39 3461294938. fabio.zattoni@ 123456unipd.it
                Article
                S2666-1683(24)00382-3
                10.1016/j.euros.2024.05.009
                11254588
                39027654
                9ba9a147-4129-4a44-958b-8a7c7a075048
                © 2024 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 31 May 2024
                Categories
                Review – Prostate Cancer

                prostate cancer,prostate biopsy,target biopsy,biopsy cores

                Comments

                Comment on this article