31
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Global fine-scale changes in ambient NO 2 during COVID-19 lockdowns

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Nitrogen dioxide (NO 2) is an important contributor to air pollution and can adversely affect human health 19 . A decrease in NO 2 concentrations has been reported as a result of lockdown measures to reduce the spread of COVID-19 1020 . Questions remain, however, regarding the relationship of satellite-derived atmospheric column NO 2 data with health-relevant ambient ground-level concentrations, and the representativeness of limited ground-based monitoring data for global assessment. Here we derive spatially resolved, global ground-level NO 2 concentrations from NO 2 column densities observed by the TROPOMI satellite instrument at sufficiently fine resolution (approximately one kilometre) to allow assessment of individual cities during COVID-19 lockdowns in 2020 compared to 2019. We apply these estimates to quantify NO 2 changes in more than 200 cities, including 65 cities without available ground monitoring, largely in lower-income regions. Mean country-level population-weighted NO 2 concentrations are 29% ± 3% lower in countries with strict lockdown conditions than in those without. Relative to long-term trends, NO 2 decreases during COVID-19 lockdowns exceed recent Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI)-derived year-to-year decreases from emission controls, comparable to 15 ± 4 years of reductions globally. Our case studies indicate that the sensitivity of NO 2 to lockdowns varies by country and emissions sector, demonstrating the critical need for spatially resolved observational information provided by these satellite-derived surface concentration estimates.

          Abstract

          The satellite instrument TROPOMI is used to assess ambient NO 2 levels at approximately one-kilometre resolution across 215 cities worldwide during COVID-19 lockdowns, finding about 30% lower NO 2 concentrations in countries with strict lockdowns.

          Related collections

          Most cited references82

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019

          Summary Background Rigorous analysis of levels and trends in exposure to leading risk factors and quantification of their effect on human health are important to identify where public health is making progress and in which cases current efforts are inadequate. The Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) 2019 provides a standardised and comprehensive assessment of the magnitude of risk factor exposure, relative risk, and attributable burden of disease. Methods GBD 2019 estimated attributable mortality, years of life lost (YLLs), years of life lived with disability (YLDs), and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 87 risk factors and combinations of risk factors, at the global level, regionally, and for 204 countries and territories. GBD uses a hierarchical list of risk factors so that specific risk factors (eg, sodium intake), and related aggregates (eg, diet quality), are both evaluated. This method has six analytical steps. (1) We included 560 risk–outcome pairs that met criteria for convincing or probable evidence on the basis of research studies. 12 risk–outcome pairs included in GBD 2017 no longer met inclusion criteria and 47 risk–outcome pairs for risks already included in GBD 2017 were added based on new evidence. (2) Relative risks were estimated as a function of exposure based on published systematic reviews, 81 systematic reviews done for GBD 2019, and meta-regression. (3) Levels of exposure in each age-sex-location-year included in the study were estimated based on all available data sources using spatiotemporal Gaussian process regression, DisMod-MR 2.1, a Bayesian meta-regression method, or alternative methods. (4) We determined, from published trials or cohort studies, the level of exposure associated with minimum risk, called the theoretical minimum risk exposure level. (5) Attributable deaths, YLLs, YLDs, and DALYs were computed by multiplying population attributable fractions (PAFs) by the relevant outcome quantity for each age-sex-location-year. (6) PAFs and attributable burden for combinations of risk factors were estimated taking into account mediation of different risk factors through other risk factors. Across all six analytical steps, 30 652 distinct data sources were used in the analysis. Uncertainty in each step of the analysis was propagated into the final estimates of attributable burden. Exposure levels for dichotomous, polytomous, and continuous risk factors were summarised with use of the summary exposure value to facilitate comparisons over time, across location, and across risks. Because the entire time series from 1990 to 2019 has been re-estimated with use of consistent data and methods, these results supersede previously published GBD estimates of attributable burden. Findings The largest declines in risk exposure from 2010 to 2019 were among a set of risks that are strongly linked to social and economic development, including household air pollution; unsafe water, sanitation, and handwashing; and child growth failure. Global declines also occurred for tobacco smoking and lead exposure. The largest increases in risk exposure were for ambient particulate matter pollution, drug use, high fasting plasma glucose, and high body-mass index. In 2019, the leading Level 2 risk factor globally for attributable deaths was high systolic blood pressure, which accounted for 10·8 million (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 9·51–12·1) deaths (19·2% [16·9–21·3] of all deaths in 2019), followed by tobacco (smoked, second-hand, and chewing), which accounted for 8·71 million (8·12–9·31) deaths (15·4% [14·6–16·2] of all deaths in 2019). The leading Level 2 risk factor for attributable DALYs globally in 2019 was child and maternal malnutrition, which largely affects health in the youngest age groups and accounted for 295 million (253–350) DALYs (11·6% [10·3–13·1] of all global DALYs that year). The risk factor burden varied considerably in 2019 between age groups and locations. Among children aged 0–9 years, the three leading detailed risk factors for attributable DALYs were all related to malnutrition. Iron deficiency was the leading risk factor for those aged 10–24 years, alcohol use for those aged 25–49 years, and high systolic blood pressure for those aged 50–74 years and 75 years and older. Interpretation Overall, the record for reducing exposure to harmful risks over the past three decades is poor. Success with reducing smoking and lead exposure through regulatory policy might point the way for a stronger role for public policy on other risks in addition to continued efforts to provide information on risk factor harm to the general public. Funding Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found
            Is Open Access

            Trends in China's anthropogenic emissions since 2010 as the consequence of clean air actions

            Abstract. To tackle the problem of severe air pollution, China has implemented active clean air policies in recent years. As a consequence, the emissions of major air pollutants have decreased and the air quality has substantially improved. Here, we quantified China's anthropogenic emission trends from 2010 to 2017 and identified the major driving forces of these trends by using a combination of bottom-up emission inventory and index decomposition analysis (IDA) approaches. The relative change rates of China's anthropogenic emissions during 2010–2017 are estimated as follows: −62 % for SO 2 , −17 % for NO x , +11 % for nonmethane volatile organic compounds (NMVOCs), +1 % for NH 3 , −27 % for CO, −38 % for PM 10 , −35 % for PM 2.5 , −27 % for BC, −35 % for OC, and +16 % for CO 2 . The IDA results suggest that emission control measures are the main drivers of this reduction, in which the pollution controls on power plants and industries are the most effective mitigation measures. The emission reduction rates markedly accelerated after the year 2013, confirming the effectiveness of China's Clean Air Action that was implemented since 2013. We estimated that during 2013–2017, China's anthropogenic emissions decreased by 59 % for SO 2 , 21 % for NO x , 23 % for CO, 36 % for PM 10 , 33 % for PM 2.5 , 28 % for BC, and 32 % for OC. NMVOC emissions increased and NH 3 emissions remained stable during 2010–2017, representing the absence of effective mitigation measures for NMVOCs and NH 3 in current policies. The relative contributions of different sectors to emissions have significantly changed after several years' implementation of clean air policies, indicating that it is paramount to introduce new policies to enable further emission reductions in the future.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The ozone monitoring instrument

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                cooperm2@dal.ca
                Journal
                Nature
                Nature
                Nature
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                0028-0836
                1476-4687
                19 January 2022
                19 January 2022
                2022
                : 601
                : 7893
                : 380-387
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.55602.34, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8200, Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science, , Dalhousie University, ; Halifax, Nova Scotia Canada
                [2 ]GRID grid.4367.6, ISNI 0000 0001 2355 7002, Department of Energy, Environmental & Chemical Engineering, , Washington University in St. Louis, ; St. Louis, MO USA
                [3 ]GRID grid.455754.2, ISNI 0000 0001 1781 4754, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, ; Cambridge, MA USA
                [4 ]GRID grid.8653.8, ISNI 0000000122851082, Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI), ; De Bilt, Netherlands
                [5 ]GRID grid.5292.c, ISNI 0000 0001 2097 4740, University of Technology Delft, ; Delft, Netherlands
                [6 ]GRID grid.57828.30, ISNI 0000 0004 0637 9680, National Center for Atmospheric Research, ; Boulder, CO USA
                [7 ]GRID grid.5292.c, ISNI 0000 0001 2097 4740, Department of Geoscience and Remote Sensing, , Delft University of Technology, ; Delft, Netherlands
                [8 ]GRID grid.133275.1, ISNI 0000 0004 0637 6666, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, ; Greenbelt, MD USA
                [9 ]GRID grid.410493.b, ISNI 0000 0000 8634 1877, Universities Space Research Association, ; Columbia, MD USA
                [10 ]GRID grid.17063.33, ISNI 0000 0001 2157 2938, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, , University of Toronto, ; Toronto, Ontario Canada
                [11 ]GRID grid.17063.33, ISNI 0000 0001 2157 2938, Department of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry, , University of Toronto, ; Toronto, Ontario Canada
                [12 ]GRID grid.410334.1, ISNI 0000 0001 2184 7612, Environment and Climate Change Canada, ; Toronto, Ontario Canada
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4145-3458
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2632-8402
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8443-7979
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6170-6750
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5054-1380
                Article
                4229
                10.1038/s41586-021-04229-0
                8770130
                35046607
                9b11153d-a963-475a-99b5-77dddf5431c3
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 9 February 2021
                : 11 November 2021
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited 2022

                Uncategorized
                atmospheric chemistry,environmental monitoring
                Uncategorized
                atmospheric chemistry, environmental monitoring

                Comments

                Comment on this article