47
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Genetic and Anatomical Basis of the Barrier Separating Wakefulness and Anesthetic-Induced Unresponsiveness

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A robust, bistable switch regulates the fluctuations between wakefulness and natural sleep as well as those between wakefulness and anesthetic-induced unresponsiveness. We previously provided experimental evidence for the existence of a behavioral barrier to transitions between these states of arousal, which we call neural inertia. Here we show that neural inertia is controlled by processes that contribute to sleep homeostasis and requires four genes involved in electrical excitability: Sh, sss, na and unc79. Although loss of function mutations in these genes can increase or decrease sensitivity to anesthesia induction, surprisingly, they all collapse neural inertia. These effects are genetically selective: neural inertia is not perturbed by loss-of-function mutations in all genes required for the sleep/wake cycle. These effects are also anatomically selective: sss acts in different neurons to influence arousal-promoting and arousal-suppressing processes underlying neural inertia. Supporting the idea that anesthesia and sleep share some, but not all, genetic and anatomical arousal-regulating pathways, we demonstrate that increasing homeostatic sleep drive widens the neural inertial barrier. We propose that processes selectively contributing to sleep homeostasis and neural inertia may be impaired in pathophysiological conditions such as coma and persistent vegetative states.

          Author Summary

          An annual 234 million surgical procedures are performed worldwide, making general anesthetics among the most common drugs administered to humans. Remarkably, however, we still do not understand the mechanisms by which general anesthetics render patients unconscious or the processes that re-establish consciousness upon emergence from anesthesia. We previously showed that the brain resists transitions between the wakeful and anesthesia states by generating a barrier to such transitions in both directions. We also showed that the existence of this barrier is conserved from invertebrates to mammals. In our present work, we use the genetic tractability and the simplified nervous system of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster to show that four genes are required to maintain this barrier. We also show that, as in mammals, there is overlap between pathways regulating natural sleep and general anesthesia. We propose that some of these shared pathways are impaired in conditions such as coma and persistent vegetative states, in which the barrier to transitioning to the waking state appears to be insurmountable.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          General anaesthesia: from molecular targets to neuronal pathways of sleep and arousal.

          The mechanisms through which general anaesthetics, an extremely diverse group of drugs, cause reversible loss of consciousness have been a long-standing mystery. Gradually, a relatively small number of important molecular targets have emerged, and how these drugs act at the molecular level is becoming clearer. Finding the link between these molecular studies and anaesthetic-induced loss of consciousness presents an enormous challenge, but comparisons with the features of natural sleep are helping us to understand how these drugs work and the neuronal pathways that they affect. Recent work suggests that the thalamus and the neuronal networks that regulate its activity are the key to understanding how anaesthetics cause loss of consciousness.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A putative flip-flop switch for control of REM sleep.

            Rapid eye movement (REM) sleep consists of a dreaming state in which there is activation of the cortical and hippocampal electroencephalogram (EEG), rapid eye movements, and loss of muscle tone. Although REM sleep was discovered more than 50 years ago, the neuronal circuits responsible for switching between REM and non-REM (NREM) sleep remain poorly understood. Here we propose a brainstem flip-flop switch, consisting of mutually inhibitory REM-off and REM-on areas in the mesopontine tegmentum. Each side contains GABA (gamma-aminobutyric acid)-ergic neurons that heavily innervate the other. The REM-on area also contains two populations of glutamatergic neurons. One set projects to the basal forebrain and regulates EEG components of REM sleep, whereas the other projects to the medulla and spinal cord and regulates atonia during REM sleep. The mutually inhibitory interactions of the REM-on and REM-off areas may form a flip-flop switch that sharpens state transitions and makes them vulnerable to sudden, unwanted transitions-for example, in narcolepsy.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Sleep and arousal: thalamocortical mechanisms.

              Thalamocortical activity exhibits two distinct states: (a) synchronized rhythmic activity in the form of delta, spindle, and other slow waves during EEG-synchronized sleep and (b) tonic activity during waking and rapid-eye-movement sleep. Spindle waves are generated largely through a cyclical interaction between thalamocortical and thalamic reticular neurons involving both the intrinsic membrane properties of these cells and their anatomical interconnections. Specific alterations in the interactions between these cells can result in the generation of paroxysmal events resembling absence seizures in children. The release of several different neurotransmitters from the brain stem, hypothalamus, basal forebrain, and cerebral cortex results in a depolarization of thalamocortical and thalamic reticular neurons and an enhanced excitability in many cortical pyramidal cells, thereby suppressing the generation of sleep rhythms and promoting a state that is conducive to sensory processing and cognition.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS Genet
                PLoS Genet
                plos
                plosgen
                PLoS Genetics
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1553-7390
                1553-7404
                September 2013
                September 2013
                5 September 2013
                : 9
                : 9
                : e1003605
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Pharmacology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America
                [2 ]Department of Neuroscience, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
                [3 ]Center for Sleep and Circadian Neurobiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
                [4 ]Department of Neuroscience, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
                [5 ]Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
                University of California, San Francisco, United States of America
                Author notes

                The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: WJJ EBF MBK. Performed the experiments: WJJ EBF HTH MS. Analyzed the data: WJJ EBF MBK. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: WJJ EBF KK AS MBK. Wrote the paper: WJJ EBF AS MBK.

                Article
                PGENETICS-D-13-00038
                10.1371/journal.pgen.1003605
                3764144
                24039590
                9ab3ca3a-c3b9-48bc-a29d-0e31043b152d
                Copyright @ 2013

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 3 January 2013
                : 20 May 2013
                Page count
                Pages: 12
                Funding
                The work was supported by grants from the NIH: R01 GM088156 (MBK), R01 NS072431 (WJJ), the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (AS), the University of Pennsylvania's Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics (MBK, EBF), the Whitehall foundation (WJJ), the Harold Amos Medical Faculty Development Program from the R.W. Johnson Foundation (EBF), and the University of Pennsylvania Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care (MBK). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article

                Genetics
                Genetics

                Comments

                Comment on this article