56
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Stenting and interventional radiology for obstructive jaundice in patients with unresectable biliary tract carcinomas

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Together with biliary drainage, which is an appropriate procedure for unresectable biliary cancer, biliary stent placement is used to improve symptoms associated with jaundice. Owing to investigations comparing percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD), surgical drainage, and endoscopic drainage, many types of stents are now available that can be placed endoscopically. The stents used are classified roughly as plastic stents and metal stents. Compared with plastic stents, metal stents are of large diameter, and have long-term patency (although they are expensive). For this reason, the use of metal stents is preferred for patients who are expected to survive for more than 6 months, whereas for patients who are likely to survive for less than 6 months, the use of plastic stents is not considered to be improper. Obstruction in a metal stent is caused by a tumor that grows within the stent through the mesh interstices. To overcome such problems, a covered metal stent was developed, and these stents are now used in patients with malignant distal biliary obstruction. However, this type of stent has been reported to have several shortcomings, such as being associated with the development of acute cholecystitis and stent migration. In spite of these shortcomings, evidence is expected to demonstrate its superiority over other types of stent.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A prospective randomised study of "covered" versus "uncovered" diamond stents for the management of distal malignant biliary obstruction.

          Covered self-expandable metal stents (EMS) were recently developed to overcome tumour ingrowth in conventional EMS. However, supporting evidence for the efficacy of covered EMS is lacking. We enrolled 112 patients with unresectable distal biliary malignancies. They were randomly assigned to polyurethane covered (n = 57) or original diamond stent (n = 55). Stent occlusion occurred in eight patients (14%) after a mean of 304 days in the covered group, and in 21 patients (38%) after a mean of 166 days in the uncovered group. The incidence of covered EMS occlusion was significantly lower than that of uncovered EMS (p = 0.0032). The cumulative stent patency of covered stents was significantly higher than that of uncovered stents (p = 0.0066). No tumour ingrowth occurred in the covered group while it was observed in 15 patients in the uncovered group. In subgroup analysis, the cumulative patency of the covered EMS was significantly higher in pancreatic cancer (p = 0.0363) and metastatic lymph nodes (p = 0.0354). There was no significant difference in survival between the two groups. Acute cholecystitis was observed in two of the covered group and in none of the uncovered group. Mild pancreatitis occurred in five of the covered group and in one of the uncovered group. Covered diamond stents successfully prevented tumour ingrowth and were significantly superior to uncovered stents for the treatment of patients with distal malignant biliary obstruction. However, careful attention must be paid to complications specific to covered self-expandable metal stents, such as acute cholecystitis and pancreatitis.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Randomised trial of endoscopic stenting versus surgical bypass in malignant low bileduct obstruction.

            The development of non-surgical techniques for the relief of malignant low bileduct obstruction has cast doubt on the best way of relieving jaundice, particularly in patients fit for surgery whose life expectancy is more than a few weeks. We did a randomised prospective controlled trial comparing endoscopic stent insertion and surgical biliary bypass in patients with malignant low bileduct obstruction. 204 patients were randomised (surgery 103, stent 101); 3 subsequently proved to have benign disease and were excluded, leaving 101 surgical and 100 stented patients for assessment. Technical success was achieved in 94 surgical and 95 stented patients, with functional biliary decompression obtained in 92 patients in both groups. In stented patients, there was a lower procedure-related mortality (3% vs 14%, p = 0.01), major complication rate (11% vs 29%, p = 0.02), and median total hospital stay (20 vs 26 days, p = 0.001). Recurrent jaundice occurred in 36 stented patients and 2 surgical patients. Late gastric outlet obstruction occurred in 17% of stented patients and 7% of the surgical group. Despite the early benefits of stenting there was no significant difference in overall survival between the two groups (median survival: surgical 26 weeks; stented 21 weeks; p = 0.065). Endoscopic stenting and surgery are effective palliative treatments with the former having fewer early treatment-related complications and the latter fewer late complications.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Unilateral versus bilateral endoscopic hepatic duct drainage in patients with malignant hilar biliary obstruction: results of a prospective, randomized, and controlled study.

              The necessity for drainage of both liver lobes in tumors arising at the biliary bifurcation is controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of unilateral versus bilateral drainage in patients with biliary obstruction at the hilum. One hundred fifty-seven consecutive patients with primary cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder cancer, or periportal lymph node metastases were randomly allocated to unilateral (group A) or bilateral (group B) hepatic duct drainage. In intention-to treat analysis, group A had a significantly higher rate of successful endoscopic stent insertion than group B (88.6% vs. 76.9%, p = 0.041). Group B had a significantly higher rate of complications than group A (26.9% vs. 18.9%, p = 0.026) because of the higher rate of early cholangitis (16.6% vs. 8.8%, p = 0.013). In per-protocol analysis the rate of successful drainage, complications, and mortality did not differ between the two groups. Median survival did not differ between the two groups but was significantly different for patients with cholangiocarcinoma and those with gallbladder cancer versus patients with metastatic tumors (p = 0.0247). The insertion of more than one stent would not appear justified as a routine procedure in patients with biliary bifurcation tumors.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg
                Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
                Springer-Verlag (Tokyo )
                0944-1166
                1436-0691
                16 February 2008
                January 2008
                : 15
                : 1
                : 69-73
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Medicine and Clinical Oncology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba, 260-0856 Japan
                [2 ]Department of Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
                [3 ]Department of General Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
                [4 ]Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan
                [5 ]Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Science for Research, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
                [6 ]Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
                [7 ]Department of Surgical Oncology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
                [8 ]Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology Division, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
                [9 ]Department of Radiology, Asahikawa Kosei General Hospital, Asahikawa, Japan
                [10 ]Department of Gastroenterology, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
                Article
                1282
                10.1007/s00534-007-1282-x
                2794345
                18274846
                9a78edb7-7829-4433-9113-f064f2d2cc23
                © Springer Japan 2008
                History
                : 1 October 2007
                : 22 October 2007
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Japan 2008

                Surgery
                biliary stenting,biliary tract cancer,guidelines,obstructive jaundice
                Surgery
                biliary stenting, biliary tract cancer, guidelines, obstructive jaundice

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content464

                Cited by11

                Most referenced authors310