48
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Spatial differences and temporal changes in illicit drug use in Europe quantified by wastewater analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aims

          To perform wastewater analyses to assess spatial differences and temporal changes of illicit drug use in a large European population.

          Design

          Analyses of raw wastewater over a 1-week period in 2012 and 2013.

          Setting and Participants

          Catchment areas of wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) across Europe, as follows: 2012: 25 WWTPs in 11 countries (23 cities, total population 11.50 million); 2013: 47 WWTPs in 21 countries (42 cities, total population 24.74 million).

          Measurements

          Excretion products of five illicit drugs (cocaine, amphetamine, ecstasy, methamphetamine, cannabis) were quantified in wastewater samples using methods based on liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry.

          Findings

          Spatial differences were assessed and confirmed to vary greatly across European metropolitan areas. In general, results were in agreement with traditional surveillance data, where available. While temporal changes were substantial in individual cities and years ( P ranging from insignificant to <10 −3), overall means were relatively stable. The overall mean of methamphetamine was an exception (apparent decline in 2012), as it was influenced mainly by four cities.

          Conclusions

          Wastewater analysis performed across Europe provides complementary evidence on illicit drug consumption and generally concurs with traditional surveillance data. Wastewater analysis can measure total illicit drug use more quickly and regularly than is the current norm for national surveys, and creates estimates where such data does not exist.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Estimating Community Drug Abuse by Wastewater Analysis

          Background The social and medical problems of drug abuse are a matter of increasing global concern. To tackle drug abuse in changing scenarios, international drug agencies need fresh methods to monitor trends and patterns of illicit drug consumption. Objective We tested a sewage epidemiology approach, using levels of excreted drug residues in wastewater, to monitor collective use of the major drugs of abuse in near real time. Methods Selected drug target residues derived from use of cocaine, opiates, cannabis, and amphetamines were measured by mass spectrometry in wastewater collected at major sewage treatment plants in Milan (Italy), Lugano (Switzerland), and London (United Kingdom). The amounts of drug residues conveyed to the treatment plants, reflecting the amounts collectively excreted with urine, were used to estimate consumption of the active parent drugs. Results Reproducible and characteristic profiles of illicit drug use were obtained in the three cities, thus for the first time quickly revealing changes in local consumption (e.g., cocaine consumption rose significantly on weekends in Milan). Profiles of local drug consumption based on waste-water measurements are in line with national annual prevalence estimates. Conclusions Patterns and trends of drug abuse in local communities can be promptly monitored by this tool, a convenient new complement to more complex, lengthy survey methods. In principle, searching the sewage for excreted compounds relevant to public health issues appears to have the potential to become a convenient source of real-time epidemiologic information.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Sampling for pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) and illicit drugs in wastewater systems: are your conclusions valid? A critical review.

            The analysis of 87 peer-reviewed journal articles reveals that sampling for pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) and illicit drugs in sewers and sewage treatment plant influents is mostly carried out according to existing tradition or standard laboratory protocols. Less than 5% of all studies explicitly consider internationally acknowledged guidelines or methods for the experimental design of monitoring campaigns. In the absence of a proper analysis of the system under investigation, the importance of short-term pollutant variations was typically not addressed. Therefore, due to relatively long sampling intervals, potentially inadequate sampling modes, or insufficient documentation, it remains unclear for the majority of reviewed studies whether observed variations can be attributed to "real" variations or if they simply reflect sampling artifacts. Based on results from previous and current work, the present paper demonstrates that sampling errors can lead to overinterpretation of measured data and ultimately, wrong conclusions. Depending on catchment size, sewer type, sampling setup, substance of interest, and accuracy of analytical method, avoidable sampling artifacts can range from "not significant" to "100% or more" for different compounds even within the same study. However, in most situations sampling errors can be reduced greatly, and sampling biases can be eliminated completely, by choosing an appropriate sampling mode and frequency. This is crucial, because proper sampling will help to maximize the value of measured data for the experimental assessment of the fate of PPCPs as well as for the formulation and validation of mathematical models. The trend from reporting presence or absence of a compound in "clean" water samples toward the quantification of PPCPs in raw wastewater requires not only sophisticated analytical methods but also adapted sampling methods. With increasing accuracy of chemical analyses, inappropriate sampling increasingly represents the major source of inaccuracy. A condensed step-by-step Sampling Guide is proposed as a starting point for future studies.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Evaluation of uncertainties associated with the determination of community drug use through the measurement of sewage drug biomarkers.

              The aim of this study was to integrally address the uncertainty associated with all the steps used to estimate community drug consumption through the chemical analysis of sewage biomarkers of illicit drugs. Uncertainty has been evaluated for sampling, chemical analysis, stability of drug biomarkers in sewage, back-calculation of drug use (specific case of cocaine), and estimation of population size in a catchment using data collected from a recent Europe-wide investigation and from the available literature. The quality of sampling protocols and analytical measurements has been evaluated by analyzing standardized questionnaires collected from 19 sewage treatments plants (STPs) and the results of an interlaboratory study (ILS), respectively. Extensive reviews of the available literature have been used to evaluate stability of drug biomarkers in sewage and the uncertainty related to back-calculation of cocaine use. Different methods for estimating population size in a catchment have been compared and the variability among the collected data was very high (7-55%). A reasonable strategy to reduce uncertainty was therefore to choose the most reliable estimation case by case. In the other cases, the highest uncertainties are related to the analysis of sewage drug biomarkers (uncertainty as relative standard deviation; RSD: 6-26% from ILS) and to the back-calculation of cocaine use (uncertainty; RSD: 26%). Uncertainty can be kept below 10% in the remaining steps, if specific requirements outlined in this work are considered. For each step, a best practice protocol has been suggested and discussed to reduce and keep to a minimum the uncertainty of the entire procedure and to improve the reliability of the estimates of drug use.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Addiction
                Addiction
                add
                Addiction (Abingdon, England)
                Blackwell Publishing Ltd (Oxford, UK )
                0965-2140
                1360-0443
                August 2014
                27 May 2014
                : 109
                : 8
                : 1338-1352
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (Eawag) Dübendorf, Switzerland
                [2 ]Toxicological Center, University of Antwerp Antwerp, Belgium
                [3 ]Water and Soil Protection Laboratory Bern, Switzerland
                [4 ]Research Institute for Pesticides and Water, University Jaume I Castellón de la Plana, Spain
                [5 ]Department of Environmental Health Sciences, IRCCS—Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri Milan, Italy
                [6 ]KWR Watercycle Research Institute Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
                [7 ]Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam Amsterdam, the Netherlands
                [8 ]NIREAS-International Water Research Center, University of Cyprus Nicosia, Cyprus
                [9 ]European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction Lisbon, Portugal
                [10 ]IIAA—Institute of Food Analysis and Research, University of Santiago de Compostela Santiago de Compostela, Spain
                [11 ]University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses Vodnany, Czech Republic
                [12 ]Department of Chemistry, University of Bath Bath, UK
                [13 ]Water and Soil Quality Research Group, Department of Environmental Chemistry, IDAEA-CSIC Barcelona, Spain
                [14 ]Laboratory of Organic Chemistry, Åbo Akademi University Åbo, Finland
                [15 ]Laboratoire Santé Publique Environnement, University of Paris Sud Châtenay-Malabry, France
                [16 ]Department of Chemistry, Umeå University Umeå, Sweden
                [17 ]Food and Environmental Safety Research Group, University of Valencia Valencia, Spain
                [18 ]Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NIVA) Oslo, Norway
                [19 ]Environmental Institute Kos, Slovak Republic
                [20 ]Division for Marine and Environmental Research, Rudjer Boskovic Institute Bijenicka Zagreb, Croatia
                [21 ]Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, University of Athens Athens, Greece
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: Christoph Ort, Urban Water Management, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Überlandstrasse 133, CH-8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland. E-mail: christoph.ort@ 123456eawag.ch ; Alexander van Nuijs, Toxicological Center, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium. E-mail: alexander.vannuijs@ 123456uantwerpen.be
                [*]

                Co-first authors.

                [The copyright line for this article was changed on 05 September 2014 after original online publication.]

                Article
                10.1111/add.12570
                4204159
                24861844
                9a456eb5-e7d7-42b2-b649-4a59b7be1dfd
                © 2014 The Authors. Addiction published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society for the Study of Addiction

                This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

                History
                : 24 July 2013
                : 09 October 2013
                : 01 April 2014
                Categories
                Research Reports

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                amphetamine,cannabis,cocaine,drugs of abuse,ecstasy,methamphetamine,sewage

                Comments

                Comment on this article