15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Sulfur-Oxidizing Symbionts without Canonical Genes for Autotrophic CO 2 Fixation

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Many animals and protists depend on symbiotic sulfur-oxidizing bacteria as their main food source. These bacteria use energy from oxidizing inorganic sulfur compounds to make biomass autotrophically from CO 2, serving as primary producers for their hosts. Here we describe a clade of nonautotrophic sulfur-oxidizing symbionts, “ Candidatus Kentron,” associated with marine ciliates. They lack genes for known autotrophic pathways and have a carbon stable isotope fingerprint heavier than other symbionts from similar habitats. Instead, they have the potential to oxidize sulfur to fuel the uptake of organic compounds for heterotrophic growth, a metabolic mode called chemolithoheterotrophy that is not found in other symbioses. Although several symbionts have heterotrophic features to supplement primary production, in Kentron they appear to supplant it entirely.

          ABSTRACT

          Since the discovery of symbioses between sulfur-oxidizing (thiotrophic) bacteria and invertebrates at hydrothermal vents over 40 years ago, it has been assumed that autotrophic fixation of CO 2 by the symbionts drives these nutritional associations. In this study, we investigated “ Candidatus Kentron,” the clade of symbionts hosted by Kentrophoros, a diverse genus of ciliates which are found in marine coastal sediments around the world. Despite being the main food source for their hosts, Kentron bacteria lack the key canonical genes for any of the known pathways for autotrophic carbon fixation and have a carbon stable isotope fingerprint that is unlike other thiotrophic symbionts from similar habitats. Our genomic and transcriptomic analyses instead found metabolic features consistent with growth on organic carbon, especially organic and amino acids, for which they have abundant uptake transporters. All known thiotrophic symbionts have converged on using reduced sulfur to gain energy lithotrophically, but they are diverse in their carbon sources. Some clades are obligate autotrophs, while many are mixotrophs that can supplement autotrophic carbon fixation with heterotrophic capabilities similar to those in Kentron. Here we show that Kentron bacteria are the only thiotrophic symbionts that appear to be entirely heterotrophic, unlike all other thiotrophic symbionts studied to date, which possess either the Calvin-Benson-Bassham or the reverse tricarboxylic acid cycle for autotrophy.

          Related collections

          Most cited references67

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The characterization of enzymatically amplified eukaryotic 16S-like rRNA-coding regions

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Alternative pathways of carbon dioxide fixation: insights into the early evolution of life?

            G Fuchs (2010)
            The fixation of inorganic carbon into organic material (autotrophy) is a prerequisite for life and sets the starting point of biological evolution. In the extant biosphere the reductive pentose phosphate (Calvin-Benson) cycle is the predominant mechanism by which many prokaryotes and all plants fix CO(2) into biomass. However, the fact that five alternative autotrophic pathways exist in prokaryotes is often neglected. This bias may lead to serious misjudgments in models of the global carbon cycle, in hypotheses on the evolution of metabolism, and in interpretations of geological records. Here, I review these alternative pathways that differ fundamentally from the Calvin-Benson cycle. Revealingly, these five alternative pathways pivot on acetyl-coenzyme A, the turntable of metabolism, demanding a gluconeogenic pathway starting from acetyl-coenzyme A and CO(2). It appears that the formation of an activated acetic acid from inorganic carbon represents the initial step toward metabolism. Consequently, biosyntheses likely started from activated acetic acid and gluconeogenesis preceded glycolysis.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Beyond the Calvin cycle: autotrophic carbon fixation in the ocean.

              Organisms capable of autotrophic metabolism assimilate inorganic carbon into organic carbon. They form an integral part of ecosystems by making an otherwise unavailable form of carbon available to other organisms, a central component of the global carbon cycle. For many years, the doctrine prevailed that the Calvin-Benson-Bassham (CBB) cycle is the only biochemical autotrophic CO2 fixation pathway of significance in the ocean. However, ecological, biochemical, and genomic studies carried out over the last decade have not only elucidated new pathways but also shown that autotrophic carbon fixation via pathways other than the CBB cycle can be significant. This has ramifications for our understanding of the carbon cycle and energy flow in the ocean. Here, we review the recent discoveries in the field of autotrophic carbon fixation, including the biochemistry and evolution of the different pathways, as well as their ecological relevance in various oceanic ecosystems.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                mBio
                MBio
                mbio
                mbio
                mBio
                mBio
                American Society for Microbiology (1752 N St., N.W., Washington, DC )
                2150-7511
                25 June 2019
                May-Jun 2019
                : 10
                : 3
                : e01112-19
                Affiliations
                [a ]Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, Bremen, Germany
                [b ]Max Planck Genome Centre Cologne, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne, Germany
                [c ]Max Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology, Marburg, Germany
                [d ]Energy Bioengineering and Geomicrobiology Group, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
                [e ]Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA
                [f ]MARUM, Center for Marine Environmental Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
                Oregon State University
                Author notes
                Address correspondence to Brandon K. B. Seah, kbseah@ 123456mpi-bremen.de .
                [*]

                Present address: Brandon K. B. Seah, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tübingen, Germany; Chakkiath Paul Antony, Red Sea Research Center, Biological and Environmental Sciences and Engineering (BESE) Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

                This article is contribution 1024 from the Caribbean Coral Reef Ecosystems (CCRE) Program, Smithsonian Institution.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1878-4363
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1462-7413
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7165-1714
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6307-6497
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2952-4572
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3685-0894
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8193-4902
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6904-0287
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2339-1409
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9394-825X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5819-1549
                Article
                mBio01112-19
                10.1128/mBio.01112-19
                6593406
                31239380
                9a3e1b57-9672-4e39-a83c-99fd09d8914c
                Copyright © 2019 Seah et al.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

                History
                : 3 May 2019
                : 23 May 2019
                Page count
                supplementary-material: 9, Figures: 6, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 98, Pages: 18, Words: 12375
                Funding
                Funded by: Max Planck Society;
                Award Recipient : Award Recipient : Award Recipient : Award Recipient : Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Alexander von Humboldt Foundation;
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), https://doi.org/10.13039/501100001659;
                Award ID: SFB 987
                Award Recipient : Award Recipient :
                Funded by: European Commission (EC), https://doi.org/10.13039/501100000780;
                Award ID: PIEF-GA-2011-301027
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: European Commission (EC), https://doi.org/10.13039/501100000780;
                Award ID: FET-Open Grant 686330
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (GBMF), https://doi.org/10.13039/100000936;
                Award ID: GBMF3811
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: North Carolina State University (NCSU), https://doi.org/10.13039/100007703;
                Award ID: Chancellor's Faculty Excellence Program Cluster on Microbiomes and Complex Microbial Communities
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research Article
                Applied and Environmental Science
                Custom metadata
                May/June 2019

                Life sciences
                gammaproteobacteria,chemosynthesis,ectosymbiont,lithoheterotrophy,meiofauna,protist
                Life sciences
                gammaproteobacteria, chemosynthesis, ectosymbiont, lithoheterotrophy, meiofauna, protist

                Comments

                Comment on this article