In this contribution, China S unprecedented economic achievements and great power ambitions are considered; in particular, what the implications of this epoch-making development on the world-stage could be for the continent of Africa. China's seeking to be reckoned as a great power is normally explained by way of either realism or idealism (and less commonly, constructivism), but with the gap in the extant knowledge, I attempt to identify and address the uncanny role that history has also had in influencing this. Put differently, the question posed is: what is the role of a historical consciousness in terms of China's feverish striving for great power status? In this regard, I take Orville Schell and John Delury's important text Wealth and power: China's long march to the twenty-first century (2014), as my point of departure. I also employ a poststructuralist methodology within a historical theoretical framework in order to take advantage of both nuanced and contradictory approaches. The so-called "Chinese Dream" of fuqiang (wealth and power) is fed by the rhetoric of the "hundred years of humiliation" (1842-1949), which is considered to span the years between the conclusion of the First Opium War in 1842 and the declaration of the Peoples ' Republic of China in 1949. But this line of thought is not the only factor which brought about an iron cast of historical consciousness in the Chinese psyche. The role of language within the Chinese family of languages, education and the general tendency of the Chinese state to veer towards autocracy are also examined. The motives which drive the Chinese Dream originate in the Chinese twentieth century (humiliation, Marxism, industrial development, wealth and power, among others) and these concerns are accordingly ongoing. After concluding that the Chinese Dream is likely to end in considerable disappointment for the West in that the Chinese are bound to reject Western values and priorities in favour of their own thinking (such as autocracy, reverence for authority and the importance of history in shaping their destiny), I move on to consider Allison's review of the Thucydides trap scenario within the context of the Peloponne-sian War (431-404 BCE). Despite criticism which has been levelled at this academic model, it remains valuable to analyse China's possible economic and great power trajectory into the 21st century. In the context of the Chinese Dream, I also make reference to Xi Jinping's Maoist embrace of hero worship, his renewed friendship with Putin's Russia and Xi's emphasis on the role of the Chinese Communist Party in pursuing the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) since its inception in 2013. Biden's recent visit to Asia in May 2022 in order to promote his Asia-Pacific Economic Framework to the United States ' remaining friends and allies in the area (such as Japan and India), as a counter to China's increasing economic influence in Asia and the Pacific Islands, is also considered. Russia's ongoing war in the Ukraine is an example of the complexity of international relations at a time when world power is transitioning from a system of unipolarity (where the United States is a sole superpower) to that of multi-polarity (where power is shared between the US, China and Russia). China's idiosyncratic approach to so-called "zero-Covid" and its impact on employment and immigration vis-à-vis Africa is also briefly highlighted. Against this background, I finally turn to a consideration of the possible implications of China's twentieth-century scramble for Africa continuing into the 21st century. A number of recent Chinese development projects are discussed as well as the narrative of the so-called debt trap diplomacy within the context of Africans' generally positive views regarding Chinese engagement. I conclude that China's role in Africa's economic prosperity in the 21st century is indeed nuanced. Not only are there a number of role-players vying for influence in Africa (notably Russia and the United States), but, from a Chinese perspective, Africa ranks very low on its list of priorities. On the whole, the Chinese influence on the African continent has been received positively, but caution must be advised as to what impact the Chinese tendency towards autocratic governance might have on the Chinese developmental trajectory in the 21st century.
In hierdie bydrae word ondersoek ingestel na die ongeewenaarde ekonomiese vooruitgang en gepaardgaande grootmoondheidambisies van China. In die besonder word gevra wat die moontlike gevolge van hierdie epogverskuiwende ontwikkeling vir die vasteland van Afrika sou wees. China se strewe na grootmoondheidstatus in die 21ste eeu word gewoonlik aan die hand van of realisme of idealisme verduidelik, maar ek wil graag daarna kyk vanuit 'n geskiedkundige invalshoek, wat blyk 'n unieke oogpunt te wees. Ek ondersoek die invloed wat die houvas van 'n geskiedkundige gesindheid op die Chinese psige het in hul naarstige soektog na grootmoondheidstatus. Die sogenaamde "Chinese Droom" offuqiang ("welvaart en mag") word gerugsteun deur die retoriek van die "honderd jaar van vernedering" (18421949). Daar is egter ook ander faktore wat 'n bydrae lewer tot die vermoede dat beweegredes eie aan die twintigste eeu die aansporing mag wees tot die ongekende industriele, militere en ekonomiese groei in China. My gekose metodologie is die poststrukturalisme, wat my in staat stel om met vrug benaderings in ag te neem wat selfs teenstrydig met mekaar is. Ek kom tot die gevolgtrekking dat China se rol in Afrika se welvaart van die 21ste eeu genuanseerd is. Nie net is daar talle rolspelers (soos Rusland en die Verenigde State) wat 'n belang by Afrika het nie, maar Afrika is vanuit 'n Chinese oogpunt maar van geringe belang. Die Chinese invloed op Afrika blyk grotendeels voordelig vir die vasteland te wees, maar daar moet ook gelet word op die beperkings wat China se geneigdheid tot outokrasie het op die land se ontwikkelingsvooruitsigte.
See how this article has been cited at scite.ai
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.