23
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The XprESS Multi-Sinus Dilation System for the Treatment of Chronic Sinusitis: A NICE Medical Technology Guidance

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The XprESS multi-sinus dilation system (XprESS) is a minimally invasive alternative to functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) used in the treatment of people with chronic or recurrent acute sinusitis refractory to medical treatment. The manufacturer of XprESS, Entellus Medical, claims the technology is as effective as FESS in improving quality of life and is associated with quicker recovery times and reduced costs. The Medical Technologies Advisory Committee (MTAC) at the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) selected XprESS for evaluation. Nine trials published in 13 papers were correctly identified by the company as relevant to the decision problem, including one randomised controlled trial (REMODEL study). From this evidence, the company concluded that XprESS is as beneficial as FESS for a range of clinical endpoints. The External Assessment Centre (EAC) agreed with the company’s conclusion in a subgroup of patients, but judged that the evidence did not generalise to patients within the NHS fully. The company constructed a de novo costing model. XprESS generated cost-savings of £1302 per patient compared with FESS. The EAC critiqued and updated the model’s inputs, with differences in results driven by changes in assumptions on procedure duration, length of hospital stay and the proportion of procedures undertaken in an outpatient setting under local anaesthetic. Although cost-incurring in the base case, XprESS generated cost savings under certain scenarios. The MTAC reviewed the evidence and supported the case for adoption, issuing positive draft recommendations. After public consultation NICE published this as Medical Technologies Guidance 30.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps 2012.

          The European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps 2012 is the update of similar evidence based position papers published in 2005 and 2007.The document contains chapters on definitions and classification, we now also proposed definitions for difficult to treat rhinosinusitis, control of disease and better definitions for rhinosinusitis in children. More emphasis is placed on the diagnosis and treatment of acute rhinosinusitis. Throughout the document the terms chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps are used to further point out differences in pathophysiology and treatment of these two entities. There are extensive chapters on epidemiology and predisposing factors, inflammatory mechanisms, (differential) diagnosis of facial pain, genetics, cystic fibrosis, aspirin exacerbated respiratory disease, immunodeficiencies, allergic fungal rhinosinusitis and the relationship between upper and lower airways. The chapters on paediatric acute and chronic rhinosinusitis are totally rewritten. Last but not least all available evidence for management of acute rhinosinusitis and chronic rhinosinusitis with or without nasal polyps in adults and children is analyzed and presented and management schemes based on the evidence are proposed.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Cost of adult chronic rhinosinusitis: A systematic review.

            The objective of this systematic review was to summarize the literature evaluating the costs associated with the management of adult chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Technique.

              The purpose of functional endoscopic sinus surgery is to reestablish ventilation and mucociliary clearance of the sinuses. This goal is achieved primarily by the endoscopic removal of disease from key areas of the anterior ethmoid and middle meatus. In addition, the technique also offers the possibility of performing sphenoethmoidectomy with preservation of the middle turbinate. Localized irreversible disease in the maxillary sinus may be removed endoscopically with minimal trauma. The technique allows excellent visualization, and results in minimal morbidity and bleeding. Nasal packing is not required, and surgery can usually be performed on an outpatient basis using local anesthesia.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +44 1904 324870 , michelle.jenks@york.ac.uk
                Journal
                Appl Health Econ Health Policy
                Appl Health Econ Health Policy
                Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
                Springer International Publishing (Cham )
                1175-5652
                1179-1896
                1 July 2017
                1 July 2017
                2017
                : 15
                : 5
                : 567-582
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9668, GRID grid.5685.e, York Health Economics Consortium, Enterprise House, Innovation Way, , University of York, ; Heslington, York, YO10 5NQ UK
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0641 3308, GRID grid.415050.5, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, , Freeman Hospital, ; Freeman Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE7 7DN UK
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1794 1878, GRID grid.416710.5, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, ; Level 1A, City Tower, Piccadilly Plaza, Manchester, M1 4BT UK
                Article
                337
                10.1007/s40258-017-0337-7
                5603631
                28669043
                99d339f3-e5de-473b-a7fc-8369e9dac7fd
                © The Author(s) 2017

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100010377, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence;
                Categories
                Review Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer International Publishing AG 2017

                Economics of health & social care
                Economics of health & social care

                Comments

                Comment on this article