64
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Phenome-wide heritability analysis of the UK Biobank

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Heritability estimation provides important information about the relative contribution of genetic and environmental factors to phenotypic variation, and provides an upper bound for the utility of genetic risk prediction models. Recent technological and statistical advances have enabled the estimation of additive heritability attributable to common genetic variants (SNP heritability) across a broad phenotypic spectrum. Here, we present a computationally and memory efficient heritability estimation method that can handle large sample sizes, and report the SNP heritability for 551 complex traits derived from the interim data release (152,736 subjects) of the large-scale, population-based UK Biobank, comprising both quantitative phenotypes and disease codes. We demonstrate that common genetic variation contributes to a broad array of quantitative traits and human diseases in the UK population, and identify phenotypes whose heritability is moderated by age (e.g., a majority of physical measures including height and body mass index), sex (e.g., blood pressure related traits) and socioeconomic status (education). Our study represents the first comprehensive phenome-wide heritability analysis in the UK Biobank, and underscores the importance of considering population characteristics in interpreting heritability.

          Author summary

          Heritability of a trait refers to the proportion of phenotypic variation that is due to genetic variation among individuals. It provides important information about the genetic basis of complex traits and indicates whether a phenotype is an appropriate target for more specific statistical and molecular genetic analyses. Recent studies have leveraged the increasingly ubiquitous genome-wide data and documented the heritability attributable to common genetic variation captured by genotyping microarrays for a wide range of human traits. However, heritability is not a fixed property of a phenotype and can vary with population-specific differences in the genetic background and environmental variation. Here, using a computationally and memory efficient heritability estimation method, we report the heritability for a large number of traits derived from the large-scale, population-based UK Biobank, and, for the first time, demonstrate the moderating effect of three major demographic variables (age, sex and socioeconomic status) on heritability estimates derived from genome-wide common genetic variation. Our study represents the first comprehensive heritability analysis across the phenotypic spectrum in the UK Biobank.

          Related collections

          Most cited references59

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The mystery of missing heritability: Genetic interactions create phantom heritability.

          Human genetics has been haunted by the mystery of "missing heritability" of common traits. Although studies have discovered >1,200 variants associated with common diseases and traits, these variants typically appear to explain only a minority of the heritability. The proportion of heritability explained by a set of variants is the ratio of (i) the heritability due to these variants (numerator), estimated directly from their observed effects, to (ii) the total heritability (denominator), inferred indirectly from population data. The prevailing view has been that the explanation for missing heritability lies in the numerator--that is, in as-yet undiscovered variants. While many variants surely remain to be found, we show here that a substantial portion of missing heritability could arise from overestimation of the denominator, creating "phantom heritability." Specifically, (i) estimates of total heritability implicitly assume the trait involves no genetic interactions (epistasis) among loci; (ii) this assumption is not justified, because models with interactions are also consistent with observable data; and (iii) under such models, the total heritability may be much smaller and thus the proportion of heritability explained much larger. For example, 80% of the currently missing heritability for Crohn's disease could be due to genetic interactions, if the disease involves interaction among three pathways. In short, missing heritability need not directly correspond to missing variants, because current estimates of total heritability may be significantly inflated by genetic interactions. Finally, we describe a method for estimating heritability from isolated populations that is not inflated by genetic interactions.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Characterizing the quantitative genetic contribution to rheumatoid arthritis using data from twins.

            Twin concordance data for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) on their own provide only limited insight into the relative genetic and environmental contribution to the disease. We applied quantitative genetic methods to assess the heritability of RA and to examine for evidence of differences in the genetic contribution according to sex, age, and clinical disease characteristics. Data were analyzed from 2 previously published nationwide studies of twins with RA conducted in Finland and the United Kingdom. Heritability was assessed by variance components analysis. Differences in the genetic contribution by sex, age, age at disease onset, and clinical characteristics were examined by stratification. The power of the twin study design to detect these differences was examined through simulation. The heritability of RA was 65% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 50-77) in the Finnish data and 53% (95% CI 40-65) in the UK data. There was no significant difference in the strength of the genetic contribution according to sex, age, age at onset, or disease severity subgroup. Both study designs had power to detect a contribution of at least 40% from the common family environment, and a difference in the genetic contribution of at least 50% between subgroups. Genetic factors have a substantial contribution to RA in the population, accounting for approximately 60% of the variation in liability to disease. Although tempered by power considerations, there is no evidence in these twin data that the overall genetic contribution to RA differs by sex, age, age at disease onset, and disease severity.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The inheritance of liability to certain diseases, estimated from the incidence among relatives

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS Genet
                PLoS Genet
                plos
                plosgen
                PLoS Genetics
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1553-7390
                1553-7404
                7 April 2017
                April 2017
                : 13
                : 4
                : e1006711
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital / Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, United States of America
                [2 ]Psychiatric and Neurodevelopmental Genetics Unit, Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
                [3 ]Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, United States of America
                [4 ]Analytic and Translational Genetics Unit, Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
                [5 ]School of Electrical and Computer Engineering and Meinig School of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States of America
                Stanford University, UNITED STATES
                Author notes

                The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                • Conceptualization: TG MRS JWS.

                • Data curation: TG JWS.

                • Formal analysis: TG CYC.

                • Funding acquisition: JWS MRS.

                • Methodology: TG CYC MRS JWS.

                • Resources: MRS JWS.

                • Software: TG CYC.

                • Supervision: JWS MRS.

                • Validation: TG.

                • Visualization: TG.

                • Writing – original draft: TG JWS.

                • Writing – review & editing: TG CYC BMN MRS JWS.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9548-5597
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7068-719X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0381-6334
                Article
                PGENETICS-D-16-02585
                10.1371/journal.pgen.1006711
                5400281
                28388634
                99d2b9be-2be7-4d9d-b512-c8572e3d8ddd
                © 2017 Ge et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 22 November 2016
                : 22 March 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 2, Pages: 21
                Funding
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000070, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering;
                Award ID: P41EB015896
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002, National Institutes of Health;
                Award ID: S10RR023043
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002, National Institutes of Health;
                Award ID: S10RR023401
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002, National Institutes of Health;
                Award ID: R01NS083534
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002, National Institutes of Health;
                Award ID: R01NS070963
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002, National Institutes of Health;
                Award ID: K25EB013649
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002, National Institutes of Health;
                Award ID: R21AG050122
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000025, National Institute of Mental Health;
                Award ID: K24MH094614
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
                Award ID: MGH ECOR Tosteson Postdoctoral Fellowship Award
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100005294, Massachusetts General Hospital;
                Award ID: Tepper Family MGH Research Scholar
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Demarest Lloyd, Jr. Foundation
                Award Recipient :
                This research was carried out in part at the Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging at the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), using resources provided by the Center for Functional Neuroimaging Technologies, P41EB015896, a P41 Biotechnology Resource Grant supported by the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB), National Institutes of Health (NIH). This work also involved the use of instrumentation supported by the NIH Shared Instrumentation Grant Program; specifically, grant numbers S10RR023043 and S10RR023401. This research was also funded in part by NIH grants R01NS083534, R01NS070963, 1K25EB013649-01 and 1R21AG050122-01A1 (to MRS); K24MH094614 (to JWS); and an MGH ECOR Tosteson Postdoctoral Fellowship Award (to TG). JWS is a Tepper Family MGH Research Scholar and was also supported in part by a gift from the Demarest Lloyd, Jr. Foundation. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. This research has been conducted using the UK Biobank resource.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Genetics
                Phenotypes
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Evolutionary Biology
                Population Genetics
                Genetic Polymorphism
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Genetics
                Population Genetics
                Genetic Polymorphism
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Population Biology
                Population Genetics
                Genetic Polymorphism
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Genetics
                Heredity
                Complex Traits
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Genetics
                Human Genetics
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Computational Biology
                Genome Analysis
                Genome-Wide Association Studies
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Genetics
                Genomics
                Genome Analysis
                Genome-Wide Association Studies
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Genetics
                Human Genetics
                Genome-Wide Association Studies
                Social Sciences
                Sociology
                Social Stratification
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Cognitive Science
                Cognition
                Memory
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Learning and Memory
                Memory
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Dermatology
                Skin Neoplasms
                Malignant Skin Neoplasms
                Custom metadata
                vor-update-to-uncorrected-proof
                2017-04-21
                The analyses presented in this study were based on data accessed through the UK Biobank http://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk on March 3, 2016.

                Genetics
                Genetics

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content352

                Cited by102

                Most referenced authors1,615