0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effective bridging therapy can improve CD19 CAR-T outcomes while maintaining safety in patients with large B-cell lymphoma

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Key Points

          • Bridging therapy (BT) is safe, and complete/partial response to BT confers a 42% reduction in risk of progression/death after CD19CAR-T therapy.

          • Good response to BT is twice as likely with polatuzumab than with other modalities and is particularly important for Tisa-cel outcomes.

          Visual Abstract

          Summary of BT modality, BT response and PFS post-CAR-T in all apheresed LBCL patients.

          Abstract

          The impact of bridging therapy (BT) on CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CD19CAR-T) outcomes in large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) is poorly characterized. Current practice is guided through physician preference rather than established evidence. Identification of effective BT modalities and factors predictive of response could improve both CAR-T intention to treat and clinical outcomes. We assessed BT modality and response in 375 adult patients with LBCL in relation to outcomes after axicabtagene ciloleucel (Axi-cel) or tisagenlecleucel (Tisa-cel) administration. The majority of patients received BT with chemotherapy (57%) or radiotherapy (17%). We observed that BT was safe for patients, with minimal morbidity or mortality. We showed that complete or partial response to BT conferred a 42% reduction in disease progression and death after CD19CAR-T therapy. Multivariate analysis identified several factors associated with likelihood of response to BT, including response to last line therapy, the absence of bulky disease, and the use of polatuzumab-containing chemotherapy regimens. Our data suggested that complete or partial response to BT may be more important for Tisa-cel than for Axi-cel, because all patients receiving Tisa-cel with less than partial response to BT experienced frank relapse within 12 months of CD19CAR-T infusion. In summary, BT in LBCL should be carefully planned toward optimal response and disease debulking, to improve patient outcomes associated with CD19CAR-T. Polatuzumab-containing regimens should be strongly considered for all suitable patients, and failure to achieve complete or partial response to BT before Tisa-cel administration may prompt consideration of further lines of BT where possible.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Axicabtagene Ciloleucel CAR T-Cell Therapy in Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma

          In a phase 1 trial, axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel), an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, showed efficacy in patients with refractory large B-cell lymphoma after the failure of conventional therapy.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Tisagenlecleucel in Adult Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

            Patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma that is refractory to primary and second-line therapies or that has relapsed after stem-cell transplantation have a poor prognosis. The chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy tisagenlecleucel targets and eliminates CD19-expressing B cells and showed efficacy against B-cell lymphomas in a single-center, phase 2a study.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Lisocabtagene maraleucel for patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphomas (TRANSCEND NHL 001): a multicentre seamless design study

              Lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) is an autologous, CD19-directed, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell product. We aimed to assess the activity and safety of liso-cel in patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphomas.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Blood Adv
                Blood Adv
                Blood Advances
                The American Society of Hematology
                2473-9529
                2473-9537
                03 February 2023
                27 June 2023
                03 February 2023
                : 7
                : 12
                : 2872-2883
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Haematology, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
                [2 ]Research Department of Haematology, University College London Cancer Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom
                [3 ]Department of Haematology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle, United Kingdom
                [4 ]Department of Haematology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
                [5 ]Department of Haematology, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, United Kingdom
                [6 ]Department of Haematology, Queen Elizabeth II Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom
                [7 ]Department of Haematology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
                [8 ]Department of Haematology, University Hospital Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
                [9 ]Department of Haematology, The Christie Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom
                [10 ]Department of Haematology, Cardiff University Hospital, Cardiff, United Kingdom
                [11 ]Department of Haematology, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
                [12 ]Department of Haematology, St. James’s Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom
                [13 ]Department of Haematology, King’s College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
                [14 ]Cancer Research United Kingdom & University College London Cancer Trials Centre, University College London Cancer Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom
                Author notes
                []Correspondence: Claire Roddie, University College London Cancer Institute, 72 Huntley St, London, United Kingdom, WC1E 6DD; c.roddie@ 123456ucl.ac.uk
                Article
                S2473-9529(23)00055-1
                10.1182/bloodadvances.2022009019
                10300297
                36724512
                99b784cc-b720-4f81-a452-682f524ac0f6
                © 2023 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 26 September 2022
                : 21 January 2023
                Categories
                Immunobiology and Immunotherapy

                Comments

                Comment on this article