Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Urban ecological life in a metropolitan area—an insight from Satoyama conservation activities in the Greater Tokyo Area

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Urban residents need to live in an ecologically sustainable way to mitigate and adapt to climate change. To discuss the model of urban ecological life, this paper focused on Satoyama landscapes and reviewed academic articles on the existing cases of Satoyama conservation by urban residents in the Greater Tokyo Area. We analyzed activities performed by participants, benefits to participants, and targeted and achieved ecosystems. Several findings were obtained from the review of published literature. First, the participants were mainly elderly men aged 60 years or older, who were not necessarily local people and who were motivated mostly by the need to conserve nature and improve their health. People with intellectual disabilities also enjoyed the benefits of Satoyama woodland management. Second, participants tended to recognize benefits in terms of health promotion, social cohesion, recreation, and resource utilization, rather than landscape and biodiversity conservation. Third, there were different directions of Satoyama conservation from the perspectives of nature and humans. The broader ecosystem beyond each site was not necessarily considered in Satoyama conservation. These findings show the potential of, and the necessity for, attracting other urban residents by including various activities that consist of not only vegetation conservation but also communal events based on different preferences. There is also a need for balancing environmental and socio-economic perspectives, and the targeted ecosystem should be further explored in collaboration with experts in ecology and landscape planning to make urban ecological life feasible.

          Related collections

          Most cited references50

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Extinction of experience: the loss of human-nature interactions

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Motivations for conserving urban biodiversity.

            In a time of increasing urbanization, the fundamental value of conserving urban biodiversity remains controversial. How much of a fixed budget should be spent on conservation in urban versus nonurban landscapes? The answer should depend on the goals that drive our conservation actions, yet proponents of urban conservation often fail to specify the motivation for protecting urban biodiversity. This is an important shortcoming on several fronts, including a missed opportunity to make a stronger appeal to those who believe conservation biology should focus exclusively on more natural, wilder landscapes. We argue that urban areas do offer an important venue for conservation biology, but that we must become better at choosing and articulating our goals. We explored seven possible motivations for urban biodiversity conservation: preserving local biodiversity, creating stepping stones to nonurban habitat, understanding and facilitating responses to environmental change, conducting environmental education, providing ecosystem services, fulfilling ethical responsibilities, and improving human well-being. To attain all these goals, challenges must be faced that are common to the urban environment, such as localized pollution, disruption of ecosystem structure, and limited availability of land. There are, however, also challenges specific only to particular goals, meaning that different goals will require different approaches and actions. This highlights the importance of specifying the motivations behind urban biodiversity conservation. If the goals are unknown, progress cannot be assessed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Factors maintaining species diversity in satoyama, a traditional agricultural landscape of Japan

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                naomi_shimpo@awaji.ac.jp
                Journal
                Landscape Ecol Eng
                Landscape and Ecological Engineering
                Springer Japan (Tokyo )
                1860-1871
                1860-188X
                23 October 2021
                : 1-11
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.20515.33, ISNI 0000 0001 2369 4728, University of Tsukuba, ; 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058572 Japan
                [2 ]GRID grid.266453.0, ISNI 0000 0001 0724 9317, Present Address: University of Hyogo, ; 954-2 Nojimatokiwa, Awaji, Hyogo 6561726 Japan
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5271-6797
                Article
                484
                10.1007/s11355-021-00484-5
                8540869
                9974b817-e1ec-4eee-a011-41461ec4c926
                © International Consortium of Landscape and Ecological Engineering 2021

                This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.

                History
                : 31 December 2020
                : 24 September 2021
                : 1 October 2021
                Categories
                Review

                green space conservation,suburban areas,participatory biodiversity conservation,sustainable lifestyle

                Comments

                Comment on this article