58
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Validation of an Arsenic Sequential Extraction Method for Evaluating Mobility in Sediments

      , , , ,
      Environmental Science & Technology
      American Chemical Society (ACS)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Arsenic (As) mobility and transport in the environment are strongly influenced by arsenic's associations with solid phases in soil and sediment. We have tested a sequential extraction procedure intended to differentiate the following pools of solid phase arsenic: loosely and strongly adsorbed As; As coprecipitated with metal oxides or amorphous monosulfides; As coprecipitated with crystalline iron (oxyhydr)oxides; As oxides; As coprecipitated with pyrite; and As sulfides. Additions of As-bearing phases to wetland and riverbed sediment subsamples were quantitatively recovered by the following extractants of the sequential extraction procedure: As adsorbed on goethite, 1 M NaH2PO4; arsenic trioxide (As2O3), 10 M HF; arsenopyrite (FeAsS), 16 N HNO3; amorphous As sulfide, 1 N HCI, 50 mM Ti-citrate-EDTA, and 16 N HNO3; and orpiment (As2S3), hot concentrated HNO3/H2O2. Wet sediment subsamples from both highly contaminated wetland peat and less As-rich sandy riverbed sediment were used to test the extraction procedure for intra-method reproducibility. The proportional distribution of As among extractant pools was consistent for subsamples of the wetland and for subsamples of the riverbed sediments. In addition, intermethod variability between the sequential extraction procedure and a single-step hot concentrated HNO3/H2O2 acid digestion was investigated. The sum of the As recovered in the different extractant pools was not significantly different than results for the acid digestion.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Environmental Science & Technology
          Environ. Sci. Technol.
          American Chemical Society (ACS)
          0013-936X
          1520-5851
          July 2001
          July 2001
          : 35
          : 13
          : 2778-2784
          Article
          10.1021/es001511o
          11452609
          995357ac-e497-4fb7-a6c4-ab22fd33ad76
          © 2001
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article