1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Microperimetry and Adaptive Optics Imaging Reveal Localized Functional and Structural Changes in Asymptomatic RPGR Mutation Carriers

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          Female carriers of RPGR mutations demonstrate no significant retinal dysfunction or structural change despite a characteristic tapetal-like reflex. In this study, we examined localized changes of pointwise sensitivity (PWS) and cone density (CD) using microperimetry (MP) and adaptive optics (AO) imaging in female carriers of RPGR mutations.

          Methods

          In this cross-sectional case-control study, MP (MAIA, 10-2 test grid) and AO imaging (rtx1) were performed in female carriers of RPGR mutations and unrelated age-matched healthy controls. PWS at 68 loci located 1 degree to 9 degrees away from the preferred retinal locus and CD at 12 loci located 1 degree to 3 degrees away from the foveal center were measured. Severity of defect was defined by standard deviation (SD) from age-matched healthy control means: normal (<1 SD from normal average), moderate defect (1–2 SD from normal average), and severe defect (>2 SD from normal average).

          Results

          Twelve patients from seven unrelated families were enrolled. Seven patients were asymptomatic, 5 of whom had visual acuity 20/20 or better in both eyes. PWS and CD were available in 12 and 8 patients, respectively. Severe PWS and CD defect in at least 1 test location was observed in 10 of 12 patients and 7 of 8 patients, respectively. Among the five asymptomatic patients who had normal visual acuity, severe PWS and CD defects were observed in three of five and four of five patients, respectively.

          Conclusions

          MP and AO imaging revealed early functional and structural changes in asymptomatic RPGR mutation carriers and should be considered in clinical assessment of these patients.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Standards and Guidelines for the Interpretation of Sequence Variants: A Joint Consensus Recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology

          The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) previously developed guidance for the interpretation of sequence variants. 1 In the past decade, sequencing technology has evolved rapidly with the advent of high-throughput next generation sequencing. By adopting and leveraging next generation sequencing, clinical laboratories are now performing an ever increasing catalogue of genetic testing spanning genotyping, single genes, gene panels, exomes, genomes, transcriptomes and epigenetic assays for genetic disorders. By virtue of increased complexity, this paradigm shift in genetic testing has been accompanied by new challenges in sequence interpretation. In this context, the ACMG convened a workgroup in 2013 comprised of representatives from the ACMG, the Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP) and the College of American Pathologists (CAP) to revisit and revise the standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants. The group consisted of clinical laboratory directors and clinicians. This report represents expert opinion of the workgroup with input from ACMG, AMP and CAP stakeholders. These recommendations primarily apply to the breadth of genetic tests used in clinical laboratories including genotyping, single genes, panels, exomes and genomes. This report recommends the use of specific standard terminology: ‘pathogenic’, ‘likely pathogenic’, ‘uncertain significance’, ‘likely benign’, and ‘benign’ to describe variants identified in Mendelian disorders. Moreover, this recommendation describes a process for classification of variants into these five categories based on criteria using typical types of variant evidence (e.g. population data, computational data, functional data, segregation data, etc.). Because of the increased complexity of analysis and interpretation of clinical genetic testing described in this report, the ACMG strongly recommends that clinical molecular genetic testing should be performed in a CLIA-approved laboratory with results interpreted by a board-certified clinical molecular geneticist or molecular genetic pathologist or equivalent.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            HGVS Recommendations for the Description of Sequence Variants: 2016 Update.

            The consistent and unambiguous description of sequence variants is essential to report and exchange information on the analysis of a genome. In particular, DNA diagnostics critically depends on accurate and standardized description and sharing of the variants detected. The sequence variant nomenclature system proposed in 2000 by the Human Genome Variation Society has been widely adopted and has developed into an internationally accepted standard. The recommendations are currently commissioned through a Sequence Variant Description Working Group (SVD-WG) operating under the auspices of three international organizations: the Human Genome Variation Society (HGVS), the Human Variome Project (HVP), and the Human Genome Organization (HUGO). Requests for modifications and extensions go through the SVD-WG following a standard procedure including a community consultation step. Version numbers are assigned to the nomenclature system to allow users to specify the version used in their variant descriptions. Here, we present the current recommendations, HGVS version 15.11, and briefly summarize the changes that were made since the 2000 publication. Most focus has been on removing inconsistencies and tightening definitions allowing automatic data processing. An extensive version of the recommendations is available online, at http://www.HGVS.org/varnomen.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Recommendations for interpreting the loss of function PVS1 ACMG/AMP variant criterion

              The 2015 ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guideline provided a framework for classifying variants based on several benign and pathogenic evidence criteria, including a pathogenic criterion (PVS1) for predicted loss of function variants. However, the guideline did not elaborate on specific considerations for the different types of loss of function variants, nor did it provide decision-making pathways assimilating information about variant type, its location, or any additional evidence for the likelihood of a true null effect. Furthermore, this guideline did not take into account the relative strengths for each evidence type and the final outcome of their combinations with respect to PVS1 strength. Finally, criteria specifying the genes for which PVS1 can be applied are still missing. Here, as part of the ClinGen Sequence Variant Interpretation (SVI) Workgroup's goal of refining ACMG/AMP criteria, we provide recommendations for applying the PVS1 criterion using detailed guidance addressing the above-mentioned gaps. Evaluation of the refined criterion by seven disease-specific groups using heterogeneous types of loss of function variants (n = 56) showed 89% agreement with the new recommendation, while discrepancies in six variants (11%) were appropriately due to disease-specific refinements. Our recommendations will facilitate consistent and accurate interpretation of predicted loss of function variants.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
                Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
                IOVS
                Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
                The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
                0146-0404
                1552-5783
                06 January 2023
                January 2023
                : 64
                : 1
                : 3
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Centre for Ophthalmology and Visual Science, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
                [2 ]Ocular Tissue Engineering Laboratory, Lions Eye Institute, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
                [3 ]Australian Inherited Retinal Disease Registry and DNA Bank, Department of Medical Technology and Physics, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
                [4 ]Department of Optometry, School of Allied Health, University of Western Australia, Western Australia, Australia
                [5 ]Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
                [6 ]Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: Fred K. Chen, Lions Eye Institute, 2 Verdun Street, Nedlands WA, Australia; fred.chen@ 123456lei.org.au .
                Article
                IOVS-22-35668
                10.1167/iovs.64.1.3
                9836009
                36607619
                992f69df-187b-4238-8143-fb10ffbd7bb4
                Copyright 2023 The Authors

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 18 December 2022
                : 01 July 2022
                Page count
                Pages: 12
                Categories
                Retina
                Retina

                retinitis pigmentosa,x-linked carrier,retinitis pigmentosa gtpase regulator (rpgr),adaptive optics imaging,microperimetry

                Comments

                Comment on this article