13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Physiotherapy Regimens in Esophagectomy and Gastrectomy: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

      review-article
      , BSc, MMed 1 , , BSc (hons), MBBS (hons), MRCS 1 , , MB BCh 2 , , PhD, FRCS 1 , , PhD, MSc, MCSP 1 , , PhD, PhD, MSc, MA, MRCS 1 , 3 , 4 , 5 ,
      Annals of Surgical Oncology
      Springer International Publishing

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Esophageal and gastric cancer surgery are associated with considerable morbidity, specifically postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs), potentially accentuated by underlying challenges with malnutrition and cachexia affecting respiratory muscle mass. Physiotherapy regimens aim to increase the respiratory muscle strength and may prevent postoperative morbidity.

          Objective

          The aim of this study was to assess the impact of physiotherapy regimens in patients treated with esophagectomy or gastrectomy.

          Methods

          An electronic database search was performed in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL and Pedro databases. A meta-analysis was performed to assess the impact of physiotherapy on the functional capacity, incidence of PPCs and postoperative morbidity, in-hospital mortality rate, length of hospital stay (LOS) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

          Results

          Seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and seven cohort studies assessing prehabilitation totaling 960 patients, and five RCTs and five cohort studies assessing peri- or postoperative physiotherapy with 703 total patients, were included. Prehabilitation resulted in a lower incidence of postoperative pneumonia and morbidity (Clavien–Dindo score ≥ II). No difference was observed in functional exercise capacity and in-hospital mortality following prehabilitation. Meanwhile, peri- or postoperative rehabilitation resulted in a lower incidence of pneumonia, shorter LOS, and better HRQoL scores for dyspnea and physical functioning, while no differences were found for the QoL summary score, global health status, fatigue, and pain scores.

          Conclusion

          This meta-analysis suggests that implementing an exercise intervention may be beneficial in both the preoperative and peri- or postoperative periods. Further investigation is needed to understand the mechanism through which exercise interventions improve clinical outcomes and which patient subgroup will gain the maximal benefit.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1245/s10434-021-11122-7.

          Related collections

          Most cited references80

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

          The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found. Over the past decade, advances in systematic review methodology and terminology have necessitated an update to the guideline. The PRISMA 2020 statement replaces the 2009 statement and includes new reporting guidance that reflects advances in methods to identify, select, appraise, and synthesise studies. The structure and presentation of the items have been modified to facilitate implementation. In this article, we present the PRISMA 2020 27-item checklist, an expanded checklist that details reporting recommendations for each item, the PRISMA 2020 abstract checklist, and the revised flow diagrams for original and updated reviews.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                s.markar@imperial.ac.uk
                Journal
                Ann Surg Oncol
                Ann Surg Oncol
                Annals of Surgical Oncology
                Springer International Publishing (Cham )
                1068-9265
                1534-4681
                27 December 2021
                27 December 2021
                2022
                : 29
                : 5
                : 3148-3167
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.7445.2, ISNI 0000 0001 2113 8111, Department of Surgery and Cancer, , Imperial College London, ; London, UK
                [2 ]GRID grid.11951.3d, ISNI 0000 0004 1937 1135, Department of Surgery, , University of the Witwatersrand, ; Johannesburg, South Africa
                [3 ]GRID grid.4991.5, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8948, Nuffield Department of Surgery, , University of Oxford, ; Oxford, UK
                [4 ]GRID grid.465198.7, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, , Karolinska Institutet, ; Solna, Sweden
                [5 ]GRID grid.426467.5, ISNI 0000 0001 2108 8951, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, , St Mary’s Hospital, ; London, UK
                Article
                11122
                10.1245/s10434-021-11122-7
                8990957
                34961901
                98f92c36-ff3b-40b7-9f6f-6a5fcafae971
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 16 August 2021
                : 11 November 2021
                Categories
                Gastrointestinal Oncology
                Custom metadata
                © Society of Surgical Oncology 2022

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                Oncology & Radiotherapy

                Comments

                Comment on this article