11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      SecurAstaP trial: securement with SecurAcath versus StatLock for peripherally inserted central catheters, a randomised open trial

      research-article
      1 , 2 , 3 , 1 , 1 , 4 , 2 , 5 , 6 , 7
      (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab)
      BMJ Open
      BMJ Publishing Group
      Randomized Controlled Trial, Time And Motion Studies, MARSI, Securement Device, StatLock, SecurAcath

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          To assess the effect on needed nursing time for dressing change.

          Design, setting, participants

          A parallel-group, open-label, randomised controlled trial in patients who are in need for a peripherally inserted central catheter insertion in one teaching hospital in Belgium. The follow-up lasted 180 days or until catheter removal, whatever came first. A computer generated table was used to allocate devices. Randomised patients were 105 adults (StatLock, n=53; SecurAcath, n=52) and primary analysis was based on all patients (n=92) with time measurements (StatLock, n=43; SecurAcath, n=49).

          Interventions

          StatLock which has to be changed weekly versus SecurAcath which could remain in place for the complete catheter dwell time.

          Main outcome measure

          Needed time for the dressing change at each dressing change (SecurAcath) or at each dressing change combined with the change of the securement device (StatLock).

          Results

          Median time needed for dressing change was 7.3 min (95% CI 6.4 min to 8.3 min) in the StatLock group and in the SecurAcath group 4.3 min (95% CI 3.8 min to 4.9 min) (P<0.0001). The time in the SecurAcath group was reduced with 41% (95% CI 29% to 51%). Incidence rates of migration, dislodgement and catheter-related bloodstream infection were comparable across groups. Pain scores were higher with SecurAcath than with StatLock at insertion (P=0.02) and at removal (P<0.001) and comparable during dressing change (P=0.38) and during dwell time (P=0.995). User-friendliness was scored at insertion and removal. All statements regarding the user-friendliness were scored significantly higher for StatLock than for SecurAcath (P<0.05). Only for the statement regarding the recommending routine use of the device, which was asked at removal, no difference was found between the two devices (P=0.32).

          Conclusion

          Use of SecurAcath saves time during dressing change compared with StatLock. Training on correct placement and removal of SecurAcath is critical to minimise pain.

          Trial registration number

          NCT02311127; Pre-results.

          Related collections

          Most cited references8

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Dressing and securement for central venous access devices (CVADs): A Cochrane systematic review

          To compare the available dressing and securement devices for central venous access devices (CVADs).
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Sutureless securement device reduces complications of peripherally inserted central venous catheters.

            This study was conducted to evaluate the performance of a sutureless adhesive-backed device, StatLock, for securement of peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICCs). Earlier studies have demonstrated that StatLock significantly reduces catheter-related complications when compared to tape. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a sutureless securement device offers an advantage over suture in preventing catheter-related complications. 170 patients requiring PICCs, which were randomized to suture (n = 85) or StatLock (n = 85) securement were prospectively studied. Patients were followed throughout their entire catheter course, and PICC-related complications including dislodgment, infection, occlusion, leakage, and central venous thrombosis were documented. Catheter outcome data were compared to determine if statistically significant differences existed between the suture and StatLock groups. The groups had equivalent demographic characteristics and catheter indications. Average securement time with StatLock was significantly shorter (4.7 minutes vs 2.7 minutes;P <.001). Although StatLock was associated with fewer total complications (42 vs 61), this difference did not achieve significance. However, there were significantly fewer PICC-related bloodstream infections in the StatLock group (2 vs 10; P =.032). One securement-related needle-stick injury was documented during suturing of a PICC. The sutureless anchor pad was beneficial for both patients and health care providers. Further investigation to determine how StatLock helps reduce catheter-related blood stream infections is necessary.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A prospective postmarket study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a new peripherally inserted central catheter stabilization system.

              An initial postmarket study of the SecurAcath used with 5 Fr peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) was conducted with 68 adult patients at 3 different institutions in the United States. PICCs were placed in both outpatients and inpatients, with patients in critical care and medical/surgical units, home care, and extended care facilities. Sixty-two (91.2%) of the patients completed therapy without a securement-related device malfunction or device-related adverse event associated with the securement system. The device was readily accepted by both patients and nursing staff. The SecurAcath represents a novel, safe, and effective method for catheter securement.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Open
                bmjopen
                bmjopen
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2044-6055
                2018
                24 February 2018
                : 8
                : 2
                : e016058
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Nursing Centre of Excellence, University Hospitals Leuven , Leuven, Belgium
                [2 ] departmentDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care , KU Leuven , Leuven, Belgium
                [3 ] departmentDepartment of Nephrology , University Hospitals Leuven , Leuven, Belgium
                [4 ] Interuniversity Centre for Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics, KU Leuven, Leuven and Universiteit Hasselt , Leuven, Belgium
                [5 ] Institute of Health and Care Sciences, University of Gothenburg , Gothenburg, Sweden
                [6 ] departmentSurgical Oncology , University Hospitals Leuven , Leuven, Belgium
                [7 ] departmentInterventional Radiology , University Hospitals Leuven , Leuven, Belgium
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr Godelieve Alice Goossens; Godelieve.Goossens@ 123456uzleuven.be
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2061-4419
                Article
                bmjopen-2017-016058
                10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016058
                5855473
                29478011
                98726dd8-fc9d-4424-8340-658a7113b8fa
                © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

                This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

                History
                : 24 January 2017
                : 22 November 2017
                : 12 December 2017
                Categories
                Evidence Based Practice
                Research
                1506
                1694
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Medicine
                randomized controlled trial,time and motion studies,marsi,securement device,statlock,securacath

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content68

                Cited by8

                Most referenced authors103