13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Submit your digital health research with an established publisher
      - celebrating 25 years of open access

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      General Practitioners’ Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence–Enabled Systems: Interview Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          General practitioners (GPs) care for a large number of patients with various diseases in very short timeframes under high uncertainty. Thus, systems enabled by artificial intelligence (AI) are promising and time-saving solutions that may increase the quality of care.

          Objective

          This study aims to understand GPs’ attitudes toward AI-enabled systems in medical diagnosis.

          Methods

          We interviewed 18 GPs from Germany between March 2020 and May 2020 to identify determinants of GPs’ attitudes toward AI-based systems in diagnosis. By analyzing the interview transcripts, we identified 307 open codes, which we then further structured to derive relevant attitude determinants.

          Results

          We merged the open codes into 21 concepts and finally into five categories: concerns, expectations, environmental influences, individual characteristics, and minimum requirements of AI-enabled systems. Concerns included all doubts and fears of the participants regarding AI-enabled systems. Expectations reflected GPs’ thoughts and beliefs about expected benefits and limitations of AI-enabled systems in terms of GP care. Environmental influences included influences resulting from an evolving working environment, key stakeholders’ perspectives and opinions, the available information technology hardware and software resources, and the media environment. Individual characteristics were determinants that describe a physician as a person, including character traits, demographic characteristics, and knowledge. In addition, the interviews also revealed the minimum requirements of AI-enabled systems, which were preconditions that must be met for GPs to contemplate using AI-enabled systems. Moreover, we identified relationships among these categories, which we conflate in our proposed model.

          Conclusions

          This study provides a thorough understanding of the perspective of future users of AI-enabled systems in primary care and lays the foundation for successful market penetration. We contribute to the research stream of analyzing and designing AI-enabled systems and the literature on attitudes toward technology and practice by fostering the understanding of GPs and their attitudes toward such systems. Our findings provide relevant information to technology developers, policymakers, and stakeholder institutions of GP care.

          Related collections

          Most cited references91

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The theory of planned behavior

          Icek Ajzen (1991)
          Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence

              Eric Topol (2019)
              The use of artificial intelligence, and the deep-learning subtype in particular, has been enabled by the use of labeled big data, along with markedly enhanced computing power and cloud storage, across all sectors. In medicine, this is beginning to have an impact at three levels: for clinicians, predominantly via rapid, accurate image interpretation; for health systems, by improving workflow and the potential for reducing medical errors; and for patients, by enabling them to process their own data to promote health. The current limitations, including bias, privacy and security, and lack of transparency, along with the future directions of these applications will be discussed in this article. Over time, marked improvements in accuracy, productivity, and workflow will likely be actualized, but whether that will be used to improve the patient-doctor relationship or facilitate its erosion remains to be seen.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                J Med Internet Res
                J Med Internet Res
                JMIR
                Journal of Medical Internet Research
                JMIR Publications (Toronto, Canada )
                1439-4456
                1438-8871
                January 2022
                27 January 2022
                : 24
                : 1
                : e28916
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Business & Information Systems Engineering University of Bayreuth Bayreuth Germany
                [2 ] Centre for Future Enterprise Queensland University of Technology Brisbane Australia
                [3 ] Project Group Business & Information Systems Engineering Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology Bayreuth Germany
                [4 ] Finance & Information Management Research Center Bayreuth Germany
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Christoph Buck Christoph.Buck@ 123456uni-bayreuth.de
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1636-1874
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2986-0448
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9195-1335
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9799-2557
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5307-3006
                Article
                v24i1e28916
                10.2196/28916
                8832268
                35084342
                980f6633-d08e-477e-b435-2b95ffe319e3
                ©Christoph Buck, Eileen Doctor, Jasmin Hennrich, Jan Jöhnk, Torsten Eymann. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 27.01.2022.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

                History
                : 18 March 2021
                : 31 March 2021
                : 24 June 2021
                : 21 November 2021
                Categories
                Original Paper
                Original Paper

                Medicine
                artificial intelligence,ai,attitude,primary care,general practitioner,gp,qualitative interview,diagnosis,clinical decision support system

                Comments

                Comment on this article