6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Predicting circadian misalignment with wearable technology: validation of wrist-worn actigraphy and photometry in night shift workers

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Study Objectives

          A critical barrier to successful treatment of circadian misalignment in shift workers is determining circadian phase in a clinical or field setting. Light and movement data collected passively from wrist actigraphy can generate predictions of circadian phase via mathematical models; however, these models have largely been tested in non-shift working adults. This study tested the feasibility and accuracy of actigraphy in predicting dim light melatonin onset (DLMO) in fixed night shift workers.

          Methods

          A sample of 45 night shift workers wore wrist actigraphs before completing DLMO in the laboratory (17.0 days ± 10.3 SD). DLMO was assessed via 24 hourly saliva samples in dim light (<10 lux). Data from actigraphy were provided as input to a mathematical model to generate predictions of circadian phase. Agreement was assessed and compared to average sleep timing on non-workdays as a proxy of DLMO. Model code and an open-source prototype assessment tool are available (www.predictDLMO.com).

          Results

          Model predictions of DLMO showed good concordance with in-lab DLMO, with Lin’s concordance coefficient of 0.70, which was twice as high as agreement using average sleep timing as a proxy of DLMO. The absolute mean error of the predictions was 2.88 h, with 76% and 91% of the predictions falling with 2 and 4 h, respectively.

          Conclusion

          This study is the first to demonstrate the use of wrist actigraphy-based estimates of circadian phase as a clinically useful and valid alternative to in-lab measurement of DLMO in fixed night shift workers. Future research should explore how additional predictors may impact accuracy.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Book: not found

          International Classification of Sleep Disorders

          "The International Classification of Sleep Disorders - Third Edition (ICSD-3) is the authoritative clinical text for the diagnosis of sleep disorders. This is an essential reference for all clinicians with sleep disorders patients. Updated in 2014, the third revision to the ICSD features significant content changes, including new nomenclature, classifications and diagnoses. The book also features accurate diagnostic codes for the corresponding ICD-9 and ICD-10 diagnoses at the beginning of each diagnosis section of the ICSD-3. Disorders are grouped into six major categories: Insomnia ; Sleep Related Breathing Disorders ; Central Disorders of Hypersomnolence ; Circadian Rhythm Sleep-Wake Disorders ; Parasomnias ; Sleep Related Movement Disorders." --
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Adverse metabolic and cardiovascular consequences of circadian misalignment.

            There is considerable epidemiological evidence that shift work is associated with increased risk for obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease, perhaps the result of physiologic maladaptation to chronically sleeping and eating at abnormal circadian times. To begin to understand underlying mechanisms, we determined the effects of such misalignment between behavioral cycles (fasting/feeding and sleep/wake cycles) and endogenous circadian cycles on metabolic, autonomic, and endocrine predictors of obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk. Ten adults (5 female) underwent a 10-day laboratory protocol, wherein subjects ate and slept at all phases of the circadian cycle-achieved by scheduling a recurring 28-h "day." Subjects ate 4 isocaloric meals each 28-h "day." For 8 days, plasma leptin, insulin, glucose, and cortisol were measured hourly, urinary catecholamines 2 hourly (totaling approximately 1,000 assays/subject), and blood pressure, heart rate, cardiac vagal modulation, oxygen consumption, respiratory exchange ratio, and polysomnographic sleep daily. Core body temperature was recorded continuously for 10 days to assess circadian phase. Circadian misalignment, when subjects ate and slept approximately 12 h out of phase from their habitual times, systematically decreased leptin (-17%, P < 0.001), increased glucose (+6%, P < 0.001) despite increased insulin (+22%, P = 0.006), completely reversed the daily cortisol rhythm (P < 0.001), increased mean arterial pressure (+3%, P = 0.001), and reduced sleep efficiency (-20%, P < 0.002). Notably, circadian misalignment caused 3 of 8 subjects (with sufficient available data) to exhibit postprandial glucose responses in the range typical of a prediabetic state. These findings demonstrate the adverse cardiometabolic implications of circadian misalignment, as occurs acutely with jet lag and chronically with shift work.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              High sensitivity and interindividual variability in the response of the human circadian system to evening light

              Significance Electric lighting has fundamentally altered how the human circadian clock synchronizes to the day/night cycle. Exposure to light after dusk is pervasive in the modern world. We examined group-level sensitivity of the circadian system to evening light and the degree to which sensitivity varies between individuals. We found that, on average, humans are highly sensitive to evening light. Specifically, 50% suppression of melatonin occurred at 50-fold difference in sensitivity to evening light across individuals. Interindividual differences in light sensitivity may explain differential vulnerability to circadian disruption and subsequent impact on human health.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Sleep
                Oxford University Press (OUP)
                0161-8105
                1550-9109
                February 01 2021
                February 12 2021
                September 11 2020
                February 01 2021
                February 12 2021
                September 11 2020
                : 44
                : 2
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Sleep Disorders and Research Center, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI
                [2 ]Department of Mathematics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
                Article
                10.1093/sleep/zsaa180
                32918087
                9763101a-b43d-4ced-b0d2-55f0073e566a
                © 2020

                https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article