24
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Clinical and Patient-Centered Outcomes in Obese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes 3 Years After Randomization to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Surgery Versus Intensive Lifestyle Management: The SLIMM-T2D Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          OBJECTIVE

          To compare the effect of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery versus intensive medical diabetes and weight management (IMWM) on clinical and patient-reported outcomes in obese patients with type 2 diabetes.

          RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

          We prospectively randomized 38 obese patients with type 2 diabetes (15 male and 23 female, with mean ± SD weight 104 ± 16 kg, BMI 36.3 ± 3.4 kg/m 2, age 52 ± 6 years, and HbA 1c 8.5 ± 1.3% [69 ± 14 mmol/mol]) to laparoscopic RYGB ( n = 19) or IMWM ( n = 19). Changes in weight, HbA 1c, cardiovascular risk factors (UKPDS risk engine), and self-reported health status (the 36-Item Short-Form [SF-36] survey, Impact of Weight on Quality of Life [IWQOL] instrument, and Problem Areas in Diabetes Survey [PAID]) were assessed.

          RESULTS

          After 3 years, the RYGB group had greater weight loss (mean −24.9 kg [95% CI −29.5, −20.4] vs. −5.2 [−10.3, −0.2]; P < 0.001) and lowering of HbA 1c (−1.79% [−2.38, −1.20] vs. −0.39% [−1.06, 0.28] [−19.6 mmol/mol {95% CI −26.0, −13.1} vs. −4.3 {−11.6, 3.1}]; P < 0.001) compared with the IMWM group. Changes in cardiometabolic risk for coronary heart disease and stroke were all more favorable in RYGB versus IMWM ( P < 0.05 to P < 0.01). IWQOL improved more after RYGB ( P < 0.001), primarily due to subscales of physical function, self-esteem, and work performance. SF-36 and PAID scores improved in both groups, with no difference between treatments. A structural equation model demonstrated that improvement in overall quality of life was more strongly associated with weight loss than with improved HbA 1c and was manifest by greater improvements in IWQOL than with either SF-36 or PAID.

          CONCLUSIONS

          Three years after randomization to RYGB versus IMWM, surgery produced greater weight loss, lower HbA 1c, reduced cardiovascular risk, and improvements in obesity-related quality of life in obese patients with type 2 diabetes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references15

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups.

          The widespread use of standardized health surveys is predicated on the largely untested assumption that scales constructed from those surveys will satisfy minimum psychometric requirements across diverse population groups. Data from the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) were used to evaluate data completeness and quality, test scaling assumptions, and estimate internal-consistency reliability for the eight scales constructed from the MOS SF-36 Health Survey. Analyses were conducted among 3,445 patients and were replicated across 24 subgroups differing in sociodemographic characteristics, diagnosis, and disease severity. For each scale, item-completion rates were high across all groups (88% to 95%), but tended to be somewhat lower among the elderly, those with less than a high school education, and those in poverty. On average, surveys were complete enough to compute scales scores for more than 96% of the sample. Across patient groups, all scales passed tests for item-internal consistency (97% passed) and item-discriminant validity (92% passed). Reliability coefficients ranged from a low of 0.65 to a high of 0.94 across scales (median = 0.85) and varied somewhat across patient subgroups. Floor effects were negligible except for the two role disability scales. Noteworthy ceiling effects were observed for both role disability scales and the social functioning scale. These findings support the use of the SF-36 survey across the diverse populations studied and identify population groups in which use of standardized health status measures may or may not be problematic.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Achievement of goals in U.S. diabetes care, 1999-2010.

            Tracking national progress in diabetes care may aid in the evaluation of past efforts and identify residual gaps in care. We analyzed data for adults with self-reported diabetes from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System to examine risk-factor control, preventive practices, and risk scores for coronary heart disease over the 1999-2010 period. From 1999 through 2010, the weighted proportion of survey participants who met recommended goals for diabetes care increased, by 7.9 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8 to 15.0) for glycemic control (glycated hemoglobin level <7.0%), 9.4 percentage points (95% CI, 3.0 to 15.8) for individualized glycemic targets, 11.7 percentage points (95% CI, 5.7 to 17.7) for blood pressure (target, <130/80 mm Hg), and 20.8 percentage points (95% CI, 11.6 to 30.0) for lipid levels (target level of low-density lipoprotein [LDL] cholesterol, <100 mg per deciliter [2.6 mmol per liter]). Tobacco use did not change significantly, but the 10-year probability of coronary heart disease decreased by 2.8 to 3.7 percentage points. However, 33.4 to 48.7% of persons with diabetes still did not meet the targets for glycemic control, blood pressure, or LDL cholesterol level. Only 14.3% met the targets for all three of these measures and for tobacco use. Adherence to the recommendations for annual eye and dental examinations was unchanged, but annual lipid-level measurement and foot examination increased by 5.5 percentage points (95% CI, 1.6 to 9.4) and 6.8 percentage points (95% CI, 4.8 to 8.8), respectively. Annual vaccination for influenza and receipt of pneumococcal vaccination for participants 65 years of age or older rose by 4.5 percentage points (95% CI, 0.8 to 8.2) and 6.9 percentage points (95% CI, 3.4 to 10.4), respectively, and daily glucose monitoring increased by 12.7 percentage points (95% CI, 10.3 to 15.1). Although there were improvements in risk-factor control and adherence to preventive practices from 1999 to 2010, tobacco use remained high, and almost half of U.S. adults with diabetes did not meet the recommended goals for diabetes care.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Metabolic Surgery in the Treatment Algorithm for Type 2 Diabetes: A Joint Statement by International Diabetes Organizations.

              Despite growing evidence that bariatric/metabolic surgery powerfully improves type 2 diabetes (T2D), existing diabetes treatment algorithms do not include surgical options.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Diabetes Care
                Diabetes Care
                diacare
                dcare
                Diabetes Care
                Diabetes Care
                American Diabetes Association
                0149-5992
                1935-5548
                April 2018
                06 February 2018
                : 41
                : 4
                : 670-679
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Hypertension, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
                [2] 2Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
                [3] 3Center for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Donald C. Simonson, dsimonso@ 123456hsph.harvard.edu .
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4670-6290
                Article
                0487
                10.2337/dc17-0487
                5860843
                29432125
                975803e9-c4a7-4f2f-88db-58677a95deb1
                © 2018 by the American Diabetes Association.

                Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. More information is available at http://www.diabetesjournals.org/content/license.

                History
                : 8 March 2017
                : 18 November 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 32, Pages: 10
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000062;
                Award ID: RC1-DK-086918
                Award ID: R56-DK-095451
                Award ID: P30-DK-03836
                Funded by: Herbert Graetz Fund at Joslin Diabetes Center, DOI http://dx.doi.org/xxx;
                Funded by: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100006093;
                Award ID: CE-1304-6756
                Funded by: LifeScan, DOI ttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100004719;
                Funded by: Nestle Nutrition, DOI http://dx.doi.org/xxx;
                Funded by: Novo Nordisk, DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004191;
                Funded by: Covidien, DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100002736;
                Categories
                0708
                Clinical Care/Education/Nutrition/Psychosocial Research

                Endocrinology & Diabetes
                Endocrinology & Diabetes

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content750

                Cited by36

                Most referenced authors657