7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Boarding of Critically Ill Patients in the Emergency Department

      review-article
      , MD, MS, FACEP, FCCM 1 , , , MD, FACEP, FCCM 2 , , MD, FACEP 3 , , MD, FACEP, FCCM 4 , , MD, FCCM 5 , , MD, MS, FACEP, FCCM 6 , , MD, MPP, FACEP 7 , , MD, FACEP, FCCM 3 , , MD, MPH, FACEP 8 , , PharmD, BCPS, BCCCP, FCCM 9 , , MD, FACEP, FAAEM, FCCM 10 , , ACNP, CCRN, DNP, MSN 11
      Critical Care Medicine
      Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
      boarding, critical care, critical care outcomes, emergency service, hospital, emergency department-intensive care unit, resuscitation care units

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

          Abstract

          Objectives:

          Emergency department boarding is the practice of caring for admitted patients in the emergency department after hospital admission, and boarding has been a growing problem in the United States. Boarding of the critically ill has achieved specific attention because of its association with poor clinical outcomes. Accordingly, the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the American College of Emergency Physicians convened a Task Force to understand the implications of emergency department boarding of the critically ill. The objective of this article is to review the U.S. literature on (1) the frequency of emergency department boarding among the critically ill, (2) the outcomes associated with critical care patient boarding, and (3) local strategies developed to mitigate the impact of emergency department critical care boarding on patient outcomes.

          Data Sources and Study Selection:

          Review article.

          Data Extraction and Data Synthesis:

          Emergency department–based boarding of the critically ill patient is common, but no nationally representative frequency estimates has been reported. Boarding literature is limited by variation in the definitions used for boarding and variation in the facilities studied (boarding ranges from 2% to 88% of ICU admissions). Prolonged boarding in the emergency department has been associated with longer duration of mechanical ventilation, longer ICU and hospital length of stay, and higher mortality. Health systems have developed multiple mitigation strategies to address emergency department boarding of critically ill patients, including emergency department-based interventions, hospital-based interventions, and emergency department–based resuscitation care units.

          Conclusions:

          Emergency department boarding of critically ill patients was common and was associated with worse clinical outcomes. Health systems have generated a number of strategies to mitigate these effects. A definition for emergency department boarding is proposed. Future work should establish formal criteria for analysis and benchmarking of emergency department–based boarding overall, with subsequent efforts focused on developing and reporting innovative strategies that improve clinical outcomes of critically ill patients boarded in the emergency department.

          Related collections

          Most cited references46

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A conceptual model of emergency department crowding.

          Emergency department (ED) crowding has become a major barrier to receiving timely emergency care in the United States. Despite widespread recognition of the problem, the research and policy agendas needed to understand and address ED crowding are just beginning to unfold. We present a conceptual model of ED crowding to help researchers, administrators, and policymakers understand its causes and develop potential solutions. The conceptual model partitions ED crowding into 3 interdependent components: input, throughput, and output. These components exist within an acute care system that is characterized by the delivery of unscheduled care. The goal of the conceptual model is to provide a practical framework on which an organized research, policy, and operations management agenda can be based to alleviate ED crowding.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Diabetes 2030: Insights from Yesterday, Today, and Future Trends

            Abstract To forecast future trends in diabetes prevalence, morbidity, and costs in the United States, the Institute for Alternative Futures has updated its diabetes forecasting model and extended its projections to 2030 for the nation, all states, and several metropolitan areas. This paper describes the methodology and data sources for these diabetes forecasts and discusses key implications. In short, diabetes will remain a major health crisis in America, in spite of medical advances and prevention efforts. The prevalence of diabetes (type 2 diabetes and type 1 diabetes) will increase by 54% to more than 54.9 million Americans between 2015 and 2030; annual deaths attributed to diabetes will climb by 38% to 385,800; and total annual medical and societal costs related to diabetes will increase 53% to more than $622 billion by 2030. Improvements in management reducing the annual incidence of morbidities and premature deaths related to diabetes over this time period will result in diabetes patients living longer, but requiring many years of comprehensive management of multiple chronic diseases, resulting in dramatically increased costs. Aggressive population health measures, including increased availability of diabetes prevention programs, could help millions of adults prevent or delay the progression to type 2 diabetes, thereby helping turn around these dire projections.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The association between hospital overcrowding and mortality among patients admitted via Western Australian emergency departments.

              To examine the relationship between hospital and emergency department (ED) occupancy, as indicators of hospital overcrowding, and mortality after emergency admission. Retrospective analysis of 62 495 probabilistically linked emergency hospital admissions and death records. Three tertiary metropolitan hospitals between July 2000 and June 2003. All patients 18 years or older whose first ED attendance resulted in hospital admission during the study period. Deaths on days 2, 7 and 30 were evaluated against an Overcrowding Hazard Scale based on hospital and ED occupancy, after adjusting for age, diagnosis, referral source, urgency and mode of transport to hospital. There was a linear relationship between the Overcrowding Hazard Scale and deaths on Day 7 (r=0.98; 95% CI, 0.79-1.00). An Overcrowding Hazard Scale>2 was associated with an increased Day 2, Day 7 and Day 30 hazard ratio for death of 1.3 (95% CI, 1.1-1.6), 1.3 (95% CI, 1.2-1.5) and 1.2 (95% CI, 1.1-1.3), respectively. Deaths at 30 days associated with an Overcrowding Hazard Scale>2 compared with one of <3 were undifferentiated with respect to age, diagnosis, urgency, transport mode, referral source or hospital length of stay, but had longer ED durations of stay (risk ratio per hour of ED stay, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.1-1.1; P<0.001) and longer physician waiting times (risk ratio per hour of ED wait, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.1-1.3; P=0.01). Hospital and ED overcrowding is associated with increased mortality. The Overcrowding Hazard Scale may be used to assess the hazard associated with hospital and ED overcrowding. Reducing overcrowding may improve outcomes for patients requiring emergency hospital admission.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Crit Care Med
                Crit. Care Med
                CCM
                Critical Care Medicine
                Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (Hagerstown, MD )
                0090-3493
                1530-0293
                August 2020
                17 July 2020
                : 48
                : 8
                : 1180-1187
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Emergency Medicine and Department of Anesthesia, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA.
                [2 ]Department of Anesthesiology and Department of Emergency Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
                [3 ]Department of Emergency Medicine, Division of Critical Care, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
                [4 ]Department of Emergency Medicine and Department of Medicine, Critical Care Medicine, Palliative and Hospice Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
                [5 ]Department of Emergency Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.
                [6 ]Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.
                [7 ]Department of Emergency & Critical Care Medicine, Kettering Health System, Dayton, OH.
                [8 ]Program in Trauma, R. Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
                [9 ]Department of Pharmacy, Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC.
                [10 ]Section of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH.
                [11 ]Department of Nursing, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
                Author notes
                For information regarding this article, E-mail: nicholas-mohr@ 123456uiowa.edu
                Article
                00012
                10.1097/CCM.0000000000004385
                7365671
                32697489
                97216e1e-afe1-4bdf-8e4b-97eb5104b01c
                Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.

                History
                Categories
                Review Articles
                Custom metadata
                T
                TRUE

                boarding,critical care,critical care outcomes,emergency service,hospital,emergency department-intensive care unit,resuscitation care units

                Comments

                Comment on this article