10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Contextual Effect of Wealth on Independence: An Examination through Regional Differences in China

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The current study disentangled two different effects of wealth on psychological tendency toward independence: one is an effect exerted at the individual level (i.e., being rich) and the other one is a contextual effect (i.e., being surrounded by rich individuals). Past research has found a stronger tendency toward independence among people in economically developed societies. This association has often been explained as a result of a greater amount of choices, and thus more opportunities to express individuality that wealth affords individuals. In addition to this individual-level process, theories in cultural psychology imply that the wealth-independence link also reflects social processes—living in a rich society, regardless of one’s own wealth, promotes independence (contextual effect of wealth on independence). Through a large-scale survey in China, using multilevel analyses, we found that wealth had both the individual-level effect and contextual effect on independence as well as related psychological tendencies (influence orientation and generalized trust), suggesting that individuals are more likely to be independent with greater personal wealth and when surrounded by wealthy others. Possible processes through which independence is promoted by liing in a wealthy area are discussed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Modernization, Cultural Change, and the Persistence of Traditional Values

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Rethinking individualism and collectivism: evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses.

            Are Americans more individualistic and less collectivistic than members of other groups? The authors summarize plausible psychological implications of individualism-collectivism (IND-COL), meta-analyze cross-national and within-United States IND-COL differences, and review evidence for effects of IND-COL on self-concept, well-being, cognition, and relationality. European Americans were found to be both more individualistic-valuing personal independence more-and less collectivistic-feeling duty to in-groups less-than others. However, European Americans were not more individualistic than African Americans, or Latinos, and not less collectivistic than Japanese or Koreans. Among Asians, only Chinese showed large effects, being both less individualistic and more collectivistic. Moderate IND-COL effects were found on self-concept and relationality, and large effects were found on attribution and cognitive style.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              "Economic man" in cross-cultural perspective: behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies.

              Researchers from across the social sciences have found consistent deviations from the predictions of the canonical model of self-interest in hundreds of experiments from around the world. This research, however, cannot determine whether the uniformity results from universal patterns of human behavior or from the limited cultural variation available among the university students used in virtually all prior experimental work. To address this, we undertook a cross-cultural study of behavior in ultimatum, public goods, and dictator games in a range of small-scale societies exhibiting a wide variety of economic and cultural conditions. We found, first, that the canonical model - based on self-interest - fails in all of the societies studied. Second, our data reveal substantially more behavioral variability across social groups than has been found in previous research. Third, group-level differences in economic organization and the structure of social interactions explain a substantial portion of the behavioral variation across societies: the higher the degree of market integration and the higher the payoffs to cooperation in everyday life, the greater the level of prosociality expressed in experimental games. Fourth, the available individual-level economic and demographic variables do not consistently explain game behavior, either within or across groups. Fifth, in many cases experimental play appears to reflect the common interactional patterns of everyday life.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                17 March 2016
                2016
                : 7
                : 384
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Faculty of Economics, Shiga University Hikone, Japan
                [2] 2School of Psychology and Speech Pathology, Curtin University Perth, WA, Australia
                [3] 3Business School, Durham University Durham, UK
                [4] 4Graduate School of Management, Kyoto University Kyoto, Japan
                Author notes

                Edited by: Andrew Ryder, Concordia University, Canada

                Reviewed by: Yulia Chentsova Dutton, Georgetown University, USA; Igor Grossmann, University of Waterloo, Canada

                *Correspondence: Kosuke Takemura, boz.takemura@ 123456gmail.com

                This article was submitted to Cultural Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00384
                4794504
                27014175
                9711efc4-0dcf-431b-9828-4dc8e5685a54
                Copyright © 2016 Takemura, Hamamura, Guan and Suzuki.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 22 November 2015
                : 03 March 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 4, Equations: 0, References: 56, Pages: 9, Words: 0
                Funding
                Funded by: Kyoto University 10.13039/501100005683
                Categories
                Psychology
                Original Research

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                culture,independence,individualism,economic development,multilevel,contextual effect

                Comments

                Comment on this article