19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Short communication: A comparison of biofilm development on stainless steel and modified-surface plate heat exchangers during a 17-h milk pasteurization run.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Flow of milk through the plate heat exchanger (PHE) results in denaturation of proteins, resulting in fouling. This also accelerates bacterial adhesion on the PHE surface, eventually leading to the development of biofilms. During prolonged processing, these biofilms result in shedding of bacteria and cross-contaminate the milk being processed, thereby limiting the duration of production runs. Altering the surface properties of PHE, such as surface energy and hydrophobicity, could be an effective approach to reduce biofouling. This study was conducted to compare the extent of biofouling on native stainless steel (SS) and modified-surface [Ni-P-polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)] PHE during the pasteurization of raw milk for an uninterrupted processing run of 17 h. For microbial studies, raw and pasteurized milk samples were aseptically collected from inlets and outlets of both PHE at various time intervals to examine shedding of bacteria in the milk. At the end of the run, 3M quick swabs (3M, St. Paul, MN) and ATP swabs (Charm Sciences Inc., Lawrence, MA) were used to sample plates from different sections of the pasteurizers (regeneration, heating, and cooling) for biofilm screening and to estimate the efficiency of cleaning in place, respectively. The data were tested for ANOVA, and means were compared. Modified PHE experienced lower mesophilic and thermophilic bacterial attachment and biofilm formation (average log 1.0 and 0.99 cfu/cm2, respectively) in the regenerative section of the pasteurizer compared with SS PHE (average log 1.49 and 1.47, respectively). Similarly, higher relative light units were observed for SS PHE compared with the modified PHE, illustrating the presence of more organic matter on the surface of SS PHE at the end of the run. In addition, at h 17, milk collected from the outlet of SS PHE showed plate counts of 5.44 cfu/cm2, which were significantly higher than those for pasteurized milk collected from modified PHE (4.12 log cfu/cm2). This provided further evidence in favor of the modified PHE achieving better microbial quality of pasteurized milk in long process runs. Moreover, because cleaning SS PHE involves an acid treatment step, whereas an alkali treatment step is sufficient for the modified-surface PHE, use of the latter is both cost and time effective, making it a better surface for thermal processing of milk and other fluid dairy products.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J Dairy Sci
          Journal of dairy science
          American Dairy Science Association
          1525-3198
          0022-0302
          Apr 2018
          : 101
          : 4
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Midwest Dairy Foods Research Center, Department of Dairy and Food Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings 57007.
          [2 ] Midwest Dairy Foods Research Center, Department of Dairy and Food Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings 57007. Electronic address: sanjeev.anand@sdstate.edu.
          [3 ] Department of Animal Sciences and Industry/Food Sciences Institute, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506.
          Article
          S0022-0302(18)30039-0
          10.3168/jds.2017-14028
          29398018
          96fd1ffd-2c07-4ea6-b3d7-cddacbe38145
          Copyright © 2018 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
          History

          biofilm,cleaning,pasteurization,plate heat exchanger,stainless steel

          Comments

          Comment on this article