13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Biomechanical comparison of different prosthetic reconstructions in total en bloc spondylectomy: a finite element study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To analyse and compare the biomechanical differences between 3D-printed prostheses, titanium mesh cages and poorly matched titanium mesh cages in total en bloc spondylectomy (TES).

          Methods

          The finite element model of T10-L2 for healthy adults was modified to make three models after T12 total spondylectomy. These models were a 3D-printed prosthesis, titanium mesh cage and prosthesis-endplate mismatched titanium mesh cage for reconstruction. The range of motion (ROM), stress distribution of the endplate and internal fixation system of three models in flexion and extension, lateral bending and axial rotation were simulated and analysed by ABAQUS.

          Result

          In flexion, due to the support of the anterior prosthesis, the fixation system showed the maximum fixation strength. The fixation strength of the 3D-printed prosthesis model was 26.73 N·m /°, that of the TMC support model was 27.20 N·m /°, and that of the poorly matched TMC model was 24.16 N·m /°. In flexion, the L1 upper endplate stress of the poorly matched TMC model was 35.5% and 49.6% higher than that of the TMC and 3D-printed prosthesis, respectively. It was 17% and 28.1% higher in extension, 39.3% and 42.5% higher in lateral bending, and 82.9% and 91.2% higher in axial rotation, respectively. The lower endplate of T11 showed a similar trend, but the magnitude of the stress change was reduced. In the stress analysis of the 3D-printed prosthesis and TMC, it was found that the maximum stress was in flexion and axial rotation, followed by left and right bending, and the least stress was in extension. However, the mismatched TMC withstood the maximum von Mises stress of 418.7 MPa (almost twice as much as the buckling state) in rotation, 3 times and 5.83 times in extension, and 1.29 and 2.85 times in lateral bending, respectively.

          Conclusion

          Different prostheses with good endplate matching after total spondylectomy can obtain effective postoperative stable support, and the reduction in contact area caused by mismatch will affect the biomechanical properties and increase the probability of internal fixation failure.

          Related collections

          Most cited references31

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Application of a calibration method provides more realistic results for a finite element model of a lumbar spinal segment.

          An important step in finite element modeling is the process of validation to derive clinical relevant data. It can be assumed that defect states of a finite element model, which have not been validated before, may predict wrong results. The purpose of this study was to show the differences in accuracy between a calibrated and a non-calibrated finite element model of a lumbar spinal segment for different clinical defects.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            One-step reconstruction with a 3D-printed, custom-made prosthesis after total en bloc sacrectomy: a technical note

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Late instrumentation failure after total en bloc spondylectomy.

              The object of this study was to investigate failures after spinal reconstruction following total en bloc spondylectomy (TES), related factors, and sequelae arising from such failures in patients with malignant spinal tumors.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                mj6688@163.com
                Journal
                BMC Musculoskelet Disord
                BMC Musculoskelet Disord
                BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2474
                4 November 2022
                4 November 2022
                2022
                : 23
                : 955
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.33763.32, ISNI 0000 0004 1761 2484, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, ; Tianjin, China
                [2 ]GRID grid.459324.d, Department of Orthopaedics, , Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, ; Baoding, China
                [3 ]GRID grid.459324.d, Department of Anesthesiology, , Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, ; Baoding, China
                [4 ]GRID grid.33763.32, ISNI 0000 0004 1761 2484, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, ; Jiefangnanlu 406, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300210 China
                Article
                5919
                10.1186/s12891-022-05919-0
                9635202
                36329424
                96e990bf-ac9f-4304-b8d8-59c53859f596
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 23 August 2022
                : 26 October 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001809, National Natural Science Foundation of China;
                Award ID: 81472140
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100006606, Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin City;
                Award ID: S20ZDD484
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Orthopedics
                tes,3d-printed prosthesis,titanium mesh cage,finite element analysis
                Orthopedics
                tes, 3d-printed prosthesis, titanium mesh cage, finite element analysis

                Comments

                Comment on this article