117
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Herpes Virus Fusion and Entry: A Story with Many Characters

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Herpesviridae comprise a large family of enveloped DNA viruses all of whom employ orthologs of the same three glycoproteins, gB, gH and gL. Additionally, herpesviruses often employ accessory proteins to bind receptors and/or bind the heterodimer gH/gL or even to determine cell tropism. Sorting out how these proteins function has been resolved to a large extent by structural biology coupled with supporting biochemical and biologic evidence. Together with the G protein of vesicular stomatitis virus, gB is a charter member of the Class III fusion proteins. Unlike VSV G, gB only functions when partnered with gH/gL. However, gH/gL does not resemble any known viral fusion protein and there is evidence that its function is to upregulate the fusogenic activity of gB. In the case of herpes simplex virus, gH/gL itself is upregulated into an active state by the conformational change that occurs when gD, the receptor binding protein, binds one of its receptors. In this review we focus primarily on prototypes of the three subfamilies of herpesviruses. We will present our model for how herpes simplex virus (HSV) regulates fusion in series of highly regulated steps. Our model highlights what is known and also provides a framework to address mechanistic questions about fusion by HSV and herpesviruses in general.

          Related collections

          Most cited references187

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Visualization of interactions among bZIP and Rel family proteins in living cells using bimolecular fluorescence complementation.

          Networks of protein interactions coordinate cellular functions. We describe a bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) assay for determination of the locations of protein interactions in living cells. This approach is based on complementation between two nonfluorescent fragments of the yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) when they are brought together by interactions between proteins fused to each fragment. BiFC analysis was used to investigate interactions among bZIP and Rel family transcription factors. Regions outside the bZIP domains determined the locations of bZIP protein interactions. The subcellular sites of protein interactions were regulated by signaling. Cross-family interactions between bZIP and Rel proteins affected their subcellular localization and modulated transcription activation. These results attest to the general applicability of the BiFC assay for studies of protein interactions.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Virus membrane-fusion proteins: more than one way to make a hairpin

            Key Points Enveloped animal viruses deliver their genetic contents into host cells by a fusion reaction between the virus membrane, which is derived from the host-cell membrane during virus budding, and the host-cell membrane. Studying the molecular mechanisms of virus membrane-fusion reactions is important, as they are paradigms for cellular membrane-fusion reactions and potential targets for antiviral therapies. The fusion reactions are driven by virus membrane-fusion proteins, which undergo a major conformational change that is triggered by interactions with the target cell. Currently, two classes of virus membrane-fusion proteins are known — class I and class II. Class I proteins have been well characterized and refold to a hairpin conformation that drives membrane fusion. The class II membrane-fusion proteins are considered in detail, using the E1 protein of the alphavirus Semliki Forest virus (SFV) and the E protein of the flavivirus tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBE) as examples. In spite of the lack of any detectable amino-acid-sequence similarity, the ectodomains of the alphavirus (E1) and flavivirus (E) fusion proteins have remarkably similar secondary and tertiary structures. Both proteins fold co-translationally with a companion protein, p62 and prM, respectively. One important difference between the viruses is that different budding sites are used — new alphavirus virions bud from the plasma membrane, whereas flavivirus particles bud into the endoplasmic reticulum as immature virions, which are then transported via the exocytic pathway. The structure of the E1 and E proteins is considered in detail, as are the conformational changes that occur during target-membrane insertion and fusion. Unlike class I fusion proteins, which are already in trimeric form before fusion, class II proteins are dimers that must rearrange during fusion to form a stable membrane-inserted homotrimer. However, despite the fact that class I and class II proteins have very different structures, both classes refold during fusion to give a similar overall 'hairpin' conformation. Evidence suggests that class II trimers interact cooperatively during membrane insertion and fusion. A model for five-fold interactions at the fusion site, including the formation of a transient hemifusion intermediate, is proposed. It is likely that class I and II fusion proteins use the same overall mechanism, suggesting that there could be a universal mechanism of membrane fusion. The possibility that there could be further classes of membrane-fusion proteins in addition to class I and class II is discussed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Fusing structure and function: a structural view of the herpesvirus entry machinery.

              Herpesviruses are double-stranded DNA, enveloped viruses that infect host cells through fusion with either the host cell plasma membrane or endocytic vesicle membranes. Efficient infection of host cells by herpesviruses is remarkably more complex than infection by other viruses, as it requires the concerted effort of multiple glycoproteins and involves multiple host receptors. The structures of the major viral glycoproteins and a number of host receptors involved in the entry of the prototypical herpesviruses, the herpes simplex viruses (HSVs) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), are now known. These structural studies have accelerated our understanding of HSV and EBV binding and fusion by revealing the conformational changes that occur on virus-receptor binding, depicting potential sites of functional protein and lipid interactions, and identifying the probable viral fusogen.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Viruses
                Viruses
                viruses
                Viruses
                MDPI
                1999-4915
                10 May 2012
                May 2012
                : 4
                : 5
                : 800-832
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Pathobiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
                [2 ]School of Dental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 240 South 40th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Email: doinaa2@ 123456biochem.dental.upenn.edu (D.A.); tmcairns2@ 123456biochem.dental.upenn.edu (T.M.C.); joga@ 123456dental.upenn.edu (J.R.G.); ckrummen@ 123456dental.upenn.edu (C.K.); ghc@ 123456dental.upenn.edu (G.H.C.)
                Author notes
                [* ] Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; Email: roselyn@ 123456dental.upenn.edu ; Tel.: +1-215-898-6552 Fax: +1-215-898-8385.
                Article
                viruses-04-00800
                10.3390/v4050800
                3386629
                22754650
                96c150a5-1593-4308-bcbb-df3f0d08b52a
                © 2012 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

                This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).

                History
                : 25 April 2012
                : 04 May 2012
                : 09 May 2012
                Categories
                Review

                Microbiology & Virology
                functional region,ebv,crystal structure,glycoproteins,vzv,cmv,hsv,monoclonal antibody
                Microbiology & Virology
                functional region, ebv, crystal structure, glycoproteins, vzv, cmv, hsv, monoclonal antibody

                Comments

                Comment on this article