22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Tunnel widening in single- versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed knees

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          The consequence of tunnel widening after ACL reconstructions is foremost of importance in case of revision surgery. Tunnel expansion leads to bone loss close to the joint, and additional surgery with bone grafting prior to revision surgery might be necessary. The purpose of the study was to measure widening of the tunnels in single-bundle (SB) and double-bundle (DB) ACL reconstructed knees during the first year after surgery, detected by a novel, semi-automated 3D CT imaging modality. Our hypothesis was that there would be a difference between the initial tunnel size and the size measured one year post-operatively due to the tunnel widening process. Further, the purpose was to evaluate whether there were any differences in the amount of tunnel widening between the two surgical techniques.

          Methods

          Twenty patients who underwent DB ACL reconstruction, and 22 patients who underwent SB ACL reconstruction, performed a CT scan of the bony tunnels, during their first days after surgery and one year post-operatively. The CT scans were transformed into 3D CT reconstructions, and the tunnels were measured with the “best-fit cylinder” method, measurements at the level of tunnel aperture and 10.0 mm from the joint line.

          Results

          All tunnels in the DB and SB ACL reconstructed knees exhibited widening during the first year after the operation ( p < 0.001). The SB femoral tunnels showed more widening compared to the DB femoral AM tunnels (1.4 ± 0.9 vs. 0.5 ± 0.6 mm) ( p < 0.001), and the SB tibial tunnels widened more compared to the DB tibial PL tunnels (1.0 ± 1.0 vs. 0.5 ± 0.6) ( p < 0.043).

          Conclusion

          All tunnels widened during the first year after the ACL reconstruction with a larger amount of widening in the SB tunnels compared to the DB femoral AM tunnels and the DB tibial PL tunnels. This is the first study to detect tunnel widening in DB reconstructed knees through a semi-automated 3D CT imaging modality.

          Level of evidence

          Prospective cohort study, Level III.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Swedish National Anterior Cruciate Ligament Register: a report on baseline variables and outcomes of surgery for almost 18,000 patients.

          The Swedish National Anterior Cruciate Ligament Register provides an opportunity for quality surveillance and research. The primary objective was to recognize factors associated with a poorer outcome at an early stage. Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Registrations are made using a web-based protocol with 2 parts: a patient-based section with self-reported outcome scores and a surgeon-based section, where factors such as cause of injury, previous surgery, time between injury and reconstruction, graft selection, fixation technique, and concomitant injuries are reported. The self-reported outcome scores are registered preoperatively and at 1, 2, and 5 years. Approximately 90% of all anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions performed annually in Sweden are reported in the register. Registrations during the period 2005-2010 were included (n = 17,794). After excluding multiligament reconstructions and reoperations, the male:female ratio was 57.5:42.5 for both primary (n = 15,387) and revision (n = 964) surgery. The cause of injury was soccer in approximately half the male patients and in one third of the female patients. All subscales of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) were significantly improved 1, 2, and 5 years postoperatively in patients undergoing primary reconstructions. In terms of the KOOS, revisions did significantly less well than primary reconstructions on all follow-up occasions, and smokers fared significantly less well than nonsmokers both preoperatively and at 2 years. Patients who had concomitant meniscal or chondral injuries at reconstruction did significantly less well preoperatively and at 1 year in terms of most KOOS subscales compared with patients with no such injuries. At 5 years, a significant difference was only found in terms of the sport/recreation subscale. Double-bundle reconstructions revealed no significant differences in terms of all the KOOS subscales at 2 years compared with single-bundle reconstructions (114 double-bundle vs 5109 single-bundle). During a 5-year period, 9.1% (contralateral, 5.0%; revision, 4.1%) of the patients underwent a contralateral ACL reconstruction or revision reconstruction of the index knee. The corresponding figure for 15- to 18-year-old female soccer players was 22.0%. Primary ACL reconstruction significantly improves all the subscales of the KOOS. Young female soccer players run a major risk of reinjuring their ACL or injuring the contralateral ACL; revision ACL reconstructions do less well than primary reconstructions, and smokers do less well than nonsmokers.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Risk factors associated with revision and contralateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions in the Kaiser Permanente ACLR registry.

            Patients generally choose to undergo anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) to return to their active lifestyles. However, returning to their previous activity level may result in a retear of their reconstructed knee or an injury to their contralateral anterior cruciate ligament (CACL).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: fact or fiction?

              Radiographic enlargement of bone tunnels following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has been recently introduced in the literature; however, the etiology and clinical relevance of this phenomenon remain unclear. While early reports suggested that bone tunnel enlargement is mainly the result of an immune response to allograft tissue, more recent studies imply that other biological as well as mechanical factors play a more important role. Biological factors associated with tunnel enlargement include foreign-body immune response (against allografts), non-specific inflammatory response (as in osteolysis around total joint implants), cell necrosis due to toxic products in the tunnel (ethylene oxide, metal), and heat necrosis as a response to drilling (natural course). Mechanical factors contributing to tunnel enlargement include stress deprivation of bone within the tunnel wall, graft-tunnel motion, improper tunnel placement, and aggressive rehabilitation. Graft-tunnel motion refers to longitudinal and transverse motion of the graft within the bone tunnel and can occur with various graft types and fixation techniques. Aggressive rehabilitation programmes may contribute to tunnel enlargement as the graft-bone interface is subjected to early stress before biological incorporation is complete. Further basic research is required to verify the effect of the various proposed factors on the etiology of bone tunnel enlargement. We recommend that routine follow-up examinations after ACL reconstruction should include the measurement of bone tunnel size in order to contribute to a better understanding of the incidence, time course, and clinical relevance of this phenomenon. Improved and more anatomical surgical fixation techniques may be useful for the prevention of bone tunnel enlargement.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +47 40601176 , cathrineaga@gmail.com
                kwilson@sprivail.org
                Steinar.Johansen@lds.no
                gdornan@sprivail.org
                rlaprade@thesteadmanclinic.com
                lars.engebretsen@medisin.uio.no
                Journal
                Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
                Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
                Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
                Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                0942-2056
                1433-7347
                21 June 2016
                21 June 2016
                2017
                : 25
                : 4
                : 1316-1327
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0373 0658, GRID grid.459739.5, , Martina Hansens Hospital, ; Pb 823, 1306 Sandvika, Norway
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8921, GRID grid.5510.1, Orthopaedic Department Oslo University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, , University of Oslo, ; Oslo, Norway
                [3 ]Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center, Oslo, Norway
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0367 5968, GRID grid.419649.7, The Steadman Clinic, , Steadman Philippon Research Institute, ; 181 W. Meadow Dr. Suite 1000, Vail, CO 81657 USA
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0627 3157, GRID grid.416137.6, , Lovisenberg Diakonale Hospital, ; Pb 4970 Nydalen, 0440 Oslo, Norway
                Article
                4204
                10.1007/s00167-016-4204-0
                5420374
                27329174
                96897a35-94bf-4a70-9335-02d14121abd1
                © The Author(s) 2016

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                : 18 August 2015
                : 10 May 2016
                Funding
                Funded by: South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority
                Award ID: 2015049
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Knee
                Custom metadata
                © European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA) 2017

                Surgery
                tunnel widening,anterior cruciate ligament,acl reconstruction,double bundle,ct,3d ct,revision
                Surgery
                tunnel widening, anterior cruciate ligament, acl reconstruction, double bundle, ct, 3d ct, revision

                Comments

                Comment on this article