27
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Repurposing bromocriptine for Aβ metabolism in Alzheimer’s disease (REBRAnD) study: randomised placebo-controlled double-blind comparative trial and open-label extension trial to investigate the safety and efficacy of bromocriptine in Alzheimer’s disease with presenilin 1 (PSEN1) mutations

      other
      1 , 1 , 2 , 1 , 2 , 2 , 2 , 2 , 2 , 3 , 2 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 4 , 5 , 5 , 5 , 6 , 6 , 6 , 7 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 13 , 14 , 5 , 4 , 1 , 2 ,
      BMJ Open
      BMJ Publishing Group
      dementia, clinical trials, neurogenetics, neurology, neurobiology

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is one of the most common causes of dementia. Pathogenic variants in the presenilin 1 (PSEN1) gene are the most frequent cause of early-onset AD. Medications for patients with AD bearing PSEN1 mutation (PSEN1-AD) are limited to symptomatic therapies and no established radical treatments are available. Induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-based drug repurposing identified bromocriptine as a therapeutic candidate for PSEN1-AD. In this study, we used an enrichment strategy with iPSCs to select the study population, and we will investigate the safety and efficacy of an orally administered dose of bromocriptine in patients with PSEN1-AD.

          Methods and analysis

          This is a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. AD patients with PSEN1 mutations and a Mini Mental State Examination-Japanese score of ≤25 will be randomly assigned, at a 2:1 ratio, to the trial drug or placebo group (≥4 patients in TW-012R and ≥2 patients in placebo). This clinical trial consists of a screening period, double-blind phase (9 months) and extension phase (3 months). The double-blind phase for evaluating the efficacy and safety is composed of the low-dose maintenance period (10 mg/day), high-dose maintenance period (22.5 mg/day) and tapering period of the trial drug. Additionally, there is an open-labelled active drug extension period for evaluating long-term safety. Primary outcomes are safety and efficacy in cognitive and psychological function. Also, exploratory investigations for the efficacy of bromocriptine by neurological scores and biomarkers will be conducted.

          Ethics and dissemination

          The proposed trial is conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki, and was approved by the Institutional Review Board (K070). The study results are expected to be disseminated at international or national conferences and published in international journals following the peer-review process.

          Trial registration number

          jRCT2041200008, NCT04413344.

          Related collections

          Most cited references47

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer's disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease

            The National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer's Association charged a workgroup with the task of revising the 1984 criteria for Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia. The workgroup sought to ensure that the revised criteria would be flexible enough to be used by both general healthcare providers without access to neuropsychological testing, advanced imaging, and cerebrospinal fluid measures, and specialized investigators involved in research or in clinical trial studies who would have these tools available. We present criteria for all-cause dementia and for AD dementia. We retained the general framework of probable AD dementia from the 1984 criteria. On the basis of the past 27 years of experience, we made several changes in the clinical criteria for the diagnosis. We also retained the term possible AD dementia, but redefined it in a manner more focused than before. Biomarker evidence was also integrated into the diagnostic formulations for probable and possible AD dementia for use in research settings. The core clinical criteria for AD dementia will continue to be the cornerstone of the diagnosis in clinical practice, but biomarker evidence is expected to enhance the pathophysiological specificity of the diagnosis of AD dementia. Much work lies ahead for validating the biomarker diagnosis of AD dementia. Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Inc.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS): scale presentation and clinimetric testing results.

              We present a clinimetric assessment of the Movement Disorder Society (MDS)-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS). The MDS-UDPRS Task Force revised and expanded the UPDRS using recommendations from a published critique. The MDS-UPDRS has four parts, namely, I: Non-motor Experiences of Daily Living; II: Motor Experiences of Daily Living; III: Motor Examination; IV: Motor Complications. Twenty questions are completed by the patient/caregiver. Item-specific instructions and an appendix of complementary additional scales are provided. Movement disorder specialists and study coordinators administered the UPDRS (55 items) and MDS-UPDRS (65 items) to 877 English speaking (78% non-Latino Caucasian) patients with Parkinson's disease from 39 sites. We compared the two scales using correlative techniques and factor analysis. The MDS-UPDRS showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.79-0.93 across parts) and correlated with the original UPDRS (rho = 0.96). MDS-UPDRS across-part correlations ranged from 0.22 to 0.66. Reliable factor structures for each part were obtained (comparative fit index > 0.90 for each part), which support the use of sum scores for each part in preference to a total score of all parts. The combined clinimetric results of this study support the validity of the MDS-UPDRS for rating PD.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Open
                bmjopen
                bmjopen
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2044-6055
                2021
                30 June 2021
                : 11
                : 6
                : e051343
                Affiliations
                [1 ]departmentCenter for iPS Cell Research and Application (CiRA) , Kyoto University , Kyoto, Japan
                [2 ]departmentInstitute for Advancement of Clinical and Translational Science (iACT) , Kyoto University Hospital , Kyoto, Japan
                [3 ]departmentDepartment of Biomedical Statistics and Bioinformatics , Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine , Kyoto, Japan
                [4 ]departmentDepartment of Neurology , Mie University Graduate School of Medicine , Tsu, Japan
                [5 ]departmentDepartment of Neurology , Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine , Kyoto, Japan
                [6 ]departmentDepartment of Psychiatry , Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine , Suita, Japan
                [7 ]departmentDepartment of Neurology , Tokushima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences , Tokushima, Japan
                [8 ]departmentDepartment of Stroke , Tokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Medical Center , Tokyo, Japan
                [9 ]departmentResearch Team for Neuroimaging , Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology , Tokyo, Japan
                [10 ]departmentDepartment of Psychiatry , Asakayama Hospital , Sakai, Japan
                [11 ]departmentDepartment of Neurology , Kawasaki Medical School , Kurashiki, Japan
                [12 ]departmentDepartment of Neuropsychiatry , Fukushima Medical University Aizu Medical Center , Aizu, Japan
                [13 ]Time Therapeutics, Inc , Kyoto, Japan
                [14 ]Towa Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd , Osaka, Japan
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Haruhisa Inoue; haruhisa@ 123456cira.kyoto-u.ac.jp
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9546-9869
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3077-7262
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1006-4943
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4736-9537
                Article
                bmjopen-2021-051343
                10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051343
                8246358
                34193504
                9676e233-2dc2-40f5-8825-162d21a3d2e2
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See:  http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 17 March 2021
                : 24 May 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: Kyoto University Hospital;
                Award ID: 0709992110
                Funded by: Time Therapeutics, Inc.;
                Award ID: N/A
                Categories
                Neurology
                1506
                1713
                Protocol
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Medicine
                dementia,clinical trials,neurogenetics,neurology,neurobiology
                Medicine
                dementia, clinical trials, neurogenetics, neurology, neurobiology

                Comments

                Comment on this article