4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Acceptability of a mHealth strategy for hypertension management in a low-income and middle-income country setting: a formative qualitative study among patients and healthcare providers

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Understanding contextual needs and preferences is important for a successful design and effective outcome of a mHealth strategy.

          Objectives

          This formative study aimed to explore the perspectives of patients and providers on the acceptability of a mHealth (text message) strategy and elicit preferred features of a mHealth strategy for hypertension management.

          Design

          A qualitative study was conducted using in-depth interviews and focus group discussions guided by the technology acceptance model.

          Setting

          The study was conducted at primary healthcare facilities and at a tertiary level referral hospital in Kathmandu, Nepal.

          Participants

          A total of 61 participants, patients with hypertension (n=41), their family members (n=5), healthcare workers (n=11) and key informants (n=4) were included. We purposively recruited patients with hypertension aged 30–70 who attended the selected healthcare facilities to obtain maximum variation based on their age, sex and literacy.

          Results

          The respondents perceived the mHealth strategy to be useful as it would reinforce medication compliance and behaviour change. Participants valued the trustworthiness of information from health authorities that could be delivered privately. Some implementation challenges were identified including a lack of technical manpower, resources for software development, gaps in recording a patient’s essential information and digital illiteracy. Solutions proposed were having system-level preparedness for recording the patient’s details, establishing a separate technical department in the hospital and involving a family member to assist illiterate/elderly patients. In addition, participants preferred text messages in the local language, containing comprehensive contextual content (disease, treatment, cultural foods and misconceptions) delivered at regular intervals (2–3 times/week) preferably in the morning or evening.

          Conclusions

          We found that a simple text messaging strategy was acceptable for hypertension management in this low/middle-income country setting. However, meticulous planning must address the needs of a diverse range of participants to ensure the mHealth strategy is acceptable to wider groups.

          Related collections

          Most cited references56

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Using thematic analysis in psychology

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.

            Qualitative research explores complex phenomena encountered by clinicians, health care providers, policy makers and consumers. Although partial checklists are available, no consolidated reporting framework exists for any type of qualitative design. To develop a checklist for explicit and comprehensive reporting of qualitative studies (in depth interviews and focus groups). We performed a comprehensive search in Cochrane and Campbell Protocols, Medline, CINAHL, systematic reviews of qualitative studies, author or reviewer guidelines of major medical journals and reference lists of relevant publications for existing checklists used to assess qualitative studies. Seventy-six items from 22 checklists were compiled into a comprehensive list. All items were grouped into three domains: (i) research team and reflexivity, (ii) study design and (iii) data analysis and reporting. Duplicate items and those that were ambiguous, too broadly defined and impractical to assess were removed. Items most frequently included in the checklists related to sampling method, setting for data collection, method of data collection, respondent validation of findings, method of recording data, description of the derivation of themes and inclusion of supporting quotations. We grouped all items into three domains: (i) research team and reflexivity, (ii) study design and (iii) data analysis and reporting. The criteria included in COREQ, a 32-item checklist, can help researchers to report important aspects of the research team, study methods, context of the study, findings, analysis and interpretations.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Open
                bmjopen
                bmjopen
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2044-6055
                2021
                25 November 2021
                : 11
                : 11
                : e052986
                Affiliations
                [1 ]departmentSchool of Population Health , University of New South Wales , Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
                [2 ]departmentCentral Department of Public Health , Tribhuvan University Institute of Medicine , Kathmandu, Nepal
                [3 ]departmentCardiovascular Division , The George Institute for Global Health , Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
                [4 ]departmentCommunity Medicine , Kathmandu Medical College , Kathmandu, Nepal
                [5 ]departmentSchool of Public Health , Patan Academy of Health Sciences , Kathmandu, Nepal
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Buna Bhandari; buna.bhandari@ 123456gmail.com
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0102-8844
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9217-4937
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3108-2304
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5523-3459
                Article
                bmjopen-2021-052986
                10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052986
                8627401
                34824118
                966f2bd5-45f5-4e32-b5de-ad284b622814
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See:  http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 30 April 2021
                : 03 November 2021
                Categories
                Public Health
                1506
                1724
                Original research
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Medicine
                health informatics,public health,qualitative research,hypertension
                Medicine
                health informatics, public health, qualitative research, hypertension

                Comments

                Comment on this article