14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Aesthetic Preferences for Eastern and Western Traditional Visual Art: Identity Matters

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Western and Chinese artists have different traditions in representing the world in their paintings. While Western artists start since the Renaissance to represent the world with a central perspective and focus on salient objects in a scene, Chinese artists concentrate on context information in their paintings, mainly before the mid-19th century. We investigated whether the different typical representations influence the aesthetic preference for traditional Chinese and Western paintings in the different cultural groups. Traditional Chinese and Western paintings were presented randomly for an aesthetic evaluation to Chinese and Western participants. Both Chinese and Western paintings included two categories: landscapes and people in different scenes. Results showed a significant interaction between the source of the painting and the cultural group. For Chinese and Western paintings, a reversed pattern of aesthetic preference was observed: while Chinese participants gave higher aesthetic scores to traditional Chinese paintings than to Western paintings, Western participants tended to give higher aesthetic scores to traditional Western paintings than to Chinese paintings. We interpret this observation as indicator that personal identity is supported and enriched within cultural belongingness. Another important finding was that landscapes were more preferable than people in a scene across different cultural groups indicating a universal principle of preferences for landscapes. Thus, our results suggest that, on the one hand, the way that artists represent the world in their paintings influences the way that culturally embedded viewers perceive and appreciate paintings, but on the other hand, independent of the cultural background, anthropological universals are disclosed by the preference of landscapes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Social categorization and intergroup behaviour

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Visual aesthetics and human preference.

            Human aesthetic preference in the visual domain is reviewed from definitional, methodological, empirical, and theoretical perspectives. Aesthetic science is distinguished from the perception of art and from philosophical treatments of aesthetics. The strengths and weaknesses of important behavioral techniques are presented and discussed, including two-alternative forced-choice, rank order, subjective rating, production/adjustment, indirect, and other tasks. Major findings are reviewed about preferences for colors (single colors, color combinations, and color harmony), spatial structure (low-level spatial properties, shape properties, and spatial composition within a frame), and individual differences in both color and spatial structure. Major theoretical accounts of aesthetic response are outlined and evaluated, including explanations in terms of mere exposure effects, arousal dynamics, categorical prototypes, ecological factors, perceptual and conceptual fluency, and the interaction of multiple components. The results of the review support the conclusion that aesthetic response can be studied rigorously and meaningfully within the framework of scientific psychology.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Measuring culture outside the head: a meta-analysis of individualism-collectivism in cultural products.

              Although cultural psychology is the study of how sociocultural environments and psychological processes coconstruct each other, the field has traditionally emphasized measures of the psychological over the sociocultural. Here, the authors call attention to a growing trend of measuring the sociocultural environment. They present a quantitative review of studies that measure cultural differences in "cultural products": tangible, public representations of culture such as advertising or popular texts. They found that cultural products that come from Western cultures (mostly the United States) are more individualistic, and less collectivistic, than cultural products that come from collectivistic cultures (including Korea, Japan, China, and Mexico). The effect sizes for cultural products were larger than self-report effect sizes for this dimension (reported in Oyserman, Coon, & Kemmelmeier, 2002). In addition to presenting this evidence, the authors highlight the importance of studying the dynamic relationships between sociocultural environments and psyches.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                20 October 2016
                2016
                : 7
                : 1596
                Affiliations
                [1] 1School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences and Beijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health, Peking University Beijing, China
                [2] 2Human Science Center, Institute of Medical Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Germany
                [3] 3Parmenides Center for Art and Science Pullach, Germany
                [4] 4Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis MN, USA
                Author notes

                Edited by: Takahiko Masuda, University of Alberta, Canada

                Reviewed by: Kosuke Takemura, Shiga University, Japan; Sawa Senzaki, University of Wisconsin–Green Bay, USA

                *Correspondence: Yan Bao, baoyan@ 123456pku.edu.cn

                This article was submitted to Cultural Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01596
                5071313
                27812339
                960240ee-162a-4dd8-aca4-7a8889e57c0d
                Copyright © 2016 Bao, Yang, Lin, Fang, Wang, Pöppel and Lei.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 15 June 2016
                : 30 September 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 56, Pages: 8, Words: 0
                Funding
                Funded by: National Natural Science Foundation of China 10.13039/501100001809
                Award ID: 31371018 91120004 J1103602
                Funded by: Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst 10.13039/501100001655
                Funded by: China Scholarship Council 10.13039/501100004543
                Award ID: [2014]3026
                Categories
                Psychology
                Original Research

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                chinese painting,beauty,culture,aesthetics,visual perception,western painting

                Comments

                Comment on this article