7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Comparative urodynamics of appendiceal and ureteral Mitrofanoff conduits in children.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We report the cystometric and conduit pressure profilometric findings of 20 children for whom the Mitrofanoff principle was applied to the construction of 21 continent catheterizable urinary conduits. Mitrofanoff conduits were fashioned from ureter in 10 cases, appendix in 8, ileum in 1, stomach in 1 and a combination appendix and ureter in 1. Conduit pressure profiles showed that functional profile length correlated strongly with the static profile maximal Mitrofanoff closure pressure (p = 0.04) and dynamic profile maximal Mitrofanoff closure pressure (p = 0.02). There was a statistically significant difference between clinical continence rates for children above and below the functional profile length threshold of 2.0 cm. (p = 0.05). The zone of continence corresponded to the region of the conduit intramural tunnel. Only 2 of 21 conduits were incontinent but both were constructed with ureters implanted into bowel reservoirs. Compared to appendiceal conduits, ureteral conduits had a lower functional profile length (p < 0.01) and static profile maximal Mitrofanoff closure pressure (p < 0.01), indicating a possible advantage to the use of the appendix.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J. Urol.
          The Journal of urology
          0022-5347
          0022-5347
          Aug 1995
          : 154
          : 2 Pt 2
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Surgery, Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
          Article
          7609203
          95804a24-12df-439c-a822-2e87d11c58f2
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article