2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Genome and Environment Based Prediction Models and Methods of Complex Traits Incorporating Genotype × Environment Interaction.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Genomic-enabled prediction models are of paramount importance for the successful implementation of genomic selection (GS) based on breeding values. As opposed to animal breeding, plant breeding includes extensive multienvironment and multiyear field trial data. Hence, genomic-enabled prediction models should include genotype × environment (G × E) interaction, which most of the time increases the prediction performance when the response of lines are different from environment to environment. In this chapter, we describe a historical timeline since 2012 related to advances of the GS models that take into account G × E interaction. We describe theoretical and practical aspects of those GS models, including the gains in prediction performance when including G × E structures for both complex continuous and categorical scale traits. Then, we detailed and explained the main G × E genomic prediction models for complex traits measured in continuous and noncontinuous (categorical) scale. Related to G × E interaction models this review also examine the analyses of the information generated with high-throughput phenotype data (phenomic) and the joint analyses of multitrait and multienvironment field trial data that is also employed in the general assessment of multitrait G × E interaction. The inclusion of nongenomic data in increasing the accuracy and biological reliability of the G × E approach is also outlined. We show the recent advances in large-scale envirotyping (enviromics), and how the use of mechanistic computational modeling can derive the crop growth and development aspects useful for predicting phenotypes and explaining G × E.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Methods Mol Biol
          Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)
          Springer Science and Business Media LLC
          1940-6029
          1064-3745
          2022
          : 2467
          Affiliations
          [1 ] International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Carretera México-Veracruz, Mexico.
          [2 ] Colegio de Postgraduados, Montecillos, Mexico.
          [3 ] Facultad de Telemática, Universidad de Colima, Colima, Mexico.
          [4 ] Departamento de Genética, Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz" (ESALQ/USP), São Paulo, Brazil.
          [5 ] Department of Plant Breeding, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Alnarp, Sweden.
          [6 ] Department of Plant Sciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, IHA/CIGENE, Ås, Norway.
          [7 ] Departamento de Matemáticas, Centro Universitario de Ciencias Exactas e Ingenierías (CUCEI), Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico.
          [8 ] University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA.
          [9 ] Embrapa Arroz e Feijão, Santo Antônio de Goiás, GO, Brazil.
          [10 ] Universidad de Quintana Roo, Chetumal, Quintana Roo, Mexico. jaicueva@uqroo.edu.mx.
          [11 ] Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, CNRS, AgroParisTech, Génétique Quantitative et Evolution - Le Moulon, Gif-sur-Yvette, France. renaud.rincent@inrae.fr.
          Article
          10.1007/978-1-0716-2205-6_9
          35451779
          95160d78-b706-40c7-a350-a405c01ce19d
          History

          Genomic selection,Plant breeding,Models with G × E interaction,Genome-enabled prediction

          Comments

          Comment on this article