1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The tumor burden score may be a discriminator in microwave ablation versus liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma within the Milan criteria: a propensity score matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          This study aims to compare the prognostic outcome of resection (RES) and microwave ablation (MWA) in different tumor burden score (TBS) cohorts.

          Patients and Methods

          We retrospectively analyzed 479 patients with primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who underwent RES (n = 329) or MWA (n = 150) with curative intent at our institution. We assessed their overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) using the Kaplan–Meier curve. Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were performed to minimize selection and confounding biases. Multivariate Cox regression was used to define the association between surgical modalities and outcomes.

          Results

          Following PSM, in the TBS ≤3 cohort, the cumulative 1-, 3-, 5- year OS in the RES and MWA groups were 92.5% vs. 98.8%, 82.7% vs. 90.0%, and 82.7% vs. 83.2% (P = 0.366), respectively. The corresponding PFS rates in the RES and MWA groups were 82.7% vs. 88.0%, 63.6% vs. 68.3% and 55.2% vs. 56.3, respectively (P = 0.218). In the TBS >3 cohort, the cumulative 1-, 3-, 5- year OS between the RES and MWA groups were 92.5% vs. 95.0%, 82.8% vs. 73.2% and 76.3% vs. 55.1%, (P = 0.034), respectively. The corresponding PFS rates in the RES and MWA groups were 78.0% vs. 67.5%, 63.6% vs. 37.5% and 55.2% vs. 37.1%, respectively (P = 0.044). The IPTW analysis showed similar results as shown in PSM analysis. The multivariate Cox regression indicated that the type of surgical modality was not associated with a poorer prognostic outcome in the TBS ≤3 cohort, unlike in the TBS >3 cohort.

          Conclusion

          TBS, as a discriminator, might help guide treatment decision-making for HCC within the Milan criteria.

          Related collections

          Most cited references31

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Hepatocellular carcinoma

          Liver cancer remains a global health challenge, with an estimated incidence of >1 million cases by 2025. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common form of liver cancer and accounts for ~90% of cases. Infection by hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus are the main risk factors for HCC development, although non-alcoholic steatohepatitis associated with metabolic syndrome or diabetes mellitus is becoming a more frequent risk factor in the West. Moreover, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis-associated HCC has a unique molecular pathogenesis. Approximately 25% of all HCCs present with potentially actionable mutations, which are yet to be translated into the clinical practice. Diagnosis based upon non-invasive criteria is currently challenged by the need for molecular information that requires tissue or liquid biopsies. The current major advancements have impacted the management of patients with advanced HCC. Six systemic therapies have been approved based on phase III trials (atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, sorafenib, lenvatinib, regorafenib, cabozantinib and ramucirumab) and three additional therapies have obtained accelerated FDA approval owing to evidence of efficacy. New trials are exploring combination therapies, including checkpoint inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors or anti-VEGF therapies, or even combinations of two immunotherapy regimens. The outcomes of these trials are expected to change the landscape of HCC management at all evolutionary stages.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A global view of hepatocellular carcinoma: trends, risk, prevention and management

            Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fourth most common cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Risk factors for HCC include chronic hepatitis B and hepatitis C, alcohol addiction, metabolic liver disease (particularly nonalcoholic fatty liver disease) and exposure to dietary toxins such as aflatoxins and aristolochic acid. All these risk factors are potentially preventable, highlighting the considerable potential of risk prevention for decreasing the global burden of HCC. HCC surveillance and early detection increase the chance of potentially curative treatment; however, HCC surveillance is substantially underutilized, even in countries with sufficient medical resources. Early-stage HCC can be treated curatively by local ablation, surgical resection or liver transplantation. Treatment selection depends on tumour characteristics, the severity of underlying liver dysfunction, age, other medical comorbidities, and available medical resources and local expertise. Catheter-based locoregional treatment is used in patients with intermediate-stage cancer. Kinase and immune checkpoint inhibitors have been shown to be effective treatment options in patients with advanced-stage HCC. Together, rational deployment of prevention, attainment of global goals for viral hepatitis eradication, and improvements in HCC surveillance and therapy hold promise for achieving a substantial reduction in the worldwide HCC burden within the next few decades.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              BCLC strategy for prognosis prediction and treatment recommendation Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system. The 2022 update

              There have been major advances in the armamentarium for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) since the last official update of the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer prognosis and treatment strategy published in 2018. Whilst there have been advances in all areas, we will focus on those that have led to a change in strategy and we will discuss why, despite being encouraging, data for select interventions are still too immature for them to be incorporated into an evidence-based model for clinicians and researchers. Finally, we describe the critical insight and expert knowledge that are required to make clinical decisions for individual patients, considering all of the parameters that must be considered to deliver personalised clinical management.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2562196Role: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2562765Role: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1643812Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2562202Role: Role: Role: Role:
                Journal
                Front Oncol
                Front Oncol
                Front. Oncol.
                Frontiers in Oncology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2234-943X
                16 February 2024
                2024
                : 14
                : 1330851
                Affiliations
                [1] 1 Department of Hepatobiliary and Splenic Surgery, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University , Shenyang, China
                [2] 2 Department of General Surgery, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University , Shenyang, China
                Author notes

                Edited by: Giuseppe Zimmitti, Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero, Italy

                Reviewed by: Chao Li, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, China

                Sarah Allegra, University of Turin, Italy

                Jiang Chen, Zhejiang University, China

                Alfonso Recordare, Ospedale dell’Angelo, Italy

                *Correspondence: Chaoliu Dai, cmudaichaoliu2023@ 123456163.com

                †These authors have contributed equally to this work

                Article
                10.3389/fonc.2024.1330851
                10905383
                38434686
                94e19a2b-731e-43c3-bb81-060167ee7507
                Copyright © 2024 Wei, Xie, Xu and Dai

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 31 October 2023
                : 30 January 2024
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 3, Equations: 0, References: 31, Pages: 12, Words: 5482
                Funding
                The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This study was supported in part by the grants from 2021 Scientific Research Funding Project of Education Department of Liaoning Province (LJKZ0748 to CD) and 345 Talent Project.
                Categories
                Oncology
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                Surgical Oncology

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                liver resection,microwave ablation,hepatocellular carcinoma,tumor burden score,prognosis

                Comments

                Comment on this article