1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Genetic evaluation of dairy bulls for energy balance traits using random regression

      , ,
      Animal Science
      Cambridge University Press (CUP)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Current selection objectives for dairy cattle breeding may be favouring cows that are genetically predisposed to mobilize body tissue. This may have consequences for fertility since cows may resume reproductive activity only once the nadir of negative energy balance (NEB) has passed. In this study, we repeatedly measured food intake, live weight, milk yield and condition score of Holstein cattle in their first lactation. They were given either a high concentrate or low concentrate diet and were either selected or control animals for genetic merit for kg milk fat plus milk protein. Orthogonal polynomials were used to model each trait over time and random regression techniques allowed curves to vary between animals at both the genetic and the permanent environmental levels. Breeding values for bulls were calculated for each trait for each day of lactation. Estimates of genetic merit for energy balance were calculated from combined breeding values for either (1) food intake and milk yield output, or (2) live weight and condition-score changes.

          When estimated from daily fluxes of energy calculated from food intake and milk output, the average genetic merit of bulls for energy balance was approximately -15 MJ/day in early lactation. It became positive at about day 40 and rose to +18 MJ/day at approximately day 150. When estimated from body energy state changes the NEB in early lactation was also -15 MJ/day. It became positive at about day 80 and then rose to a peak of +10 MJ/day. The difference between the two methods may arise either because of the contribution of food wastage to intake measures or through inadequate predictions of body lipid from equations using live weight and condition score or a combination of both. Body energy mobilized in early lactation was not fully recovered until day 200 of lactation. The results suggest that energy balance may be estimated from changes in body energy state that can be calculated from body weight and condition score. Since body weight can be predicted from linear type measures, it may be possible to calculate breeding values for energy balance from national evaluations for production and type. Energy balance may be more suitable as a breeding objective than persistency.

          Related collections

          Most cited references16

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Estimates of genetic parameters for a test day model with random regressions for yield traits of first lactation Holsteins.

          A model that contains both fixed and random linear regressions is described for analyzing test day records of dairy cows. Estimation of the variances and covariances for this model was achieved by Bayesian methods utilizing the Gibbs sampler to generate samples from the marginal posterior distributions. A single-trait model was applied to yields of milk, fat, and protein of first lactation Holsteins. Heritabilities of 305-d lactation yields were 0.32, 0.28, and 0.28 for milk, fat, and protein, respectively. Heritabilities of daily yields were greater than for 305-d yields and varied from 0.40 to 0.59 for milk yield, 0.34 to 0.68 for fat yield, and 0.33 to 0.69 for protein yield. The highest heritabilities were within the first 10 d of lactation for all traits. Genetic correlations between daily yields were higher as the interval between tests decreased, and correlations of daily yields with 305-d yields were greatest during midlactation.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Interrelationships between energy balance and postpartum reproductive function in dairy cattle.

            Genetic improvement of dairy cows has markedly increased milk yield over the last three decades. Increased production has been associated with reduced conception rates (66% in 1951 versus 40 to 50% since 1975). Because conception rate in dairy heifers has remained higher, the metabolic demands of higher production may be related to the decline in reproductive performance in cows. During early lactation, increasing dietary intake fails to keep pace with rising milk production. The resultant negative energy balance and rate of mobilization of body reserves appear directly related to the postpartum interval to first ovulation and lower conception rate. Delays in the onset of normal ovarian activity, thus limiting the number of estrous cycles before breeding, may account for the observed decrease in fertility. Negative energy balance probably acts similarly to undernutrition and may manifest in delayed ovarian activity by impinging on pulsatile secretion of LH. Lower availability of glucose and insulin may also decrease LH pulsatility or limit ovarian responsiveness to gonadotropins. Alternatively, release of endogenous opioids in association with increasing feed intake or other lactational hormone responses may provide neural or pituitary inhibition of the pulsatile LH production that is requisite for ovarian follicular development.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Energy balance of dairy cattle in relation to milk production variables and fertility.

              Variables derived from milk yield records were investigated to find an easy to measure and readily available indicator of the energy balance status of a lactating cow. Weekly energy balances during the first 180 d in milk (DIM) were calculated from weekly yield, live weight, and energy intake records for 470 first lactation heifers. The energy balance curve for each cow was estimated using a random regression model. From each curve, three measures were calculated to describe the energy balance status: 1) total energy deficit in early lactation, 2) interval for return to positive energy balance, and 3) lowest value (nadir) for energy balance. Mean energy deficit per lactation was 776.8 MJ of NE(L)/d, interval for return to positive energy balance was 41.47 d, and nadir was -33.72 MJ of NE(L)/d. Regression analysis to relate these variables to interval to start of luteal activity (measured using progesterone profiles) showed that a low nadir of energy balance was related to delayed resumption of luteal activity. In general, a 10 MJ of NE(L)/d lower nadir of energy balance corresponded to a delay of ovulation of 1.25 d. A relatively strong decrease in fat percentage during early lactation was significantly correlated with lower nadir of energy balance, larger energy deficit, and later return to positive energy balance. The maximal correlation was between nadir of energy balance and a decrease of milk fat percentage. This correlation remained above 0.60 throughout the first 26 DIM but dropped to 0.14 at 180 DIM. Large decreases in milk fat percentage were related to high initial fat percentages at the start of lactation and slightly lower fat percentages later during lactation. Hence, we concluded that a decrease in fat percentage during early lactation might serve as an indicator of energy balance.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Animal Science
                Anim. Sci.
                Cambridge University Press (CUP)
                1357-7298
                1748-748X
                August 2001
                August 18 2016
                April 2001
                : 73
                : 1
                : 29-40
                Article
                10.1017/S1357729800058021
                94bf1bb9-dc0b-4107-9a6e-32e79b02d541
                © 2001

                https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article