16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      National, Regional, State, and Selected Local Area Vaccination Coverage Among Adolescents Aged 13–17 Years — United States, 2018

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommends routine vaccination of persons aged 11–12 years to protect against certain diseases, including human papillomavirus (HPV)–associated cancers, meningococcal disease, and pertussis ( 1 ). A booster dose of quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine (MenACWY) is recommended at age 16 years, and serogroup B meningococcal vaccine (MenB) may be administered to persons aged 16–23 years ( 1 ). To estimate vaccination coverage among adolescents in the United States, CDC analyzed data from the 2018 National Immunization Survey–Teen (NIS-Teen) which included 18,700 adolescents aged 13–17 years.* During 2017–2018, coverage with ≥1 dose of HPV vaccine increased from 65.5% to 68.1%, and the percentage of adolescents up-to-date † with the HPV vaccine series increased from 48.6% to 51.1%, although the increases were only observed among males. Vaccination coverage increases were also observed for ≥1 MenACWY dose (from 85.1% to 86.6%) and ≥2 MenACWY doses (from 44.3% to 50.8%). Coverage with tetanus and reduced diphtheria toxoids and acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap) remained stable at 89%. Disparities in coverage by metropolitan statistical area (MSA) § and health insurance status identified in previous years persisted ( 2 ). Coverage with ≥1 dose of HPV vaccine was higher among adolescents whose parents reported receiving a provider recommendation; however, prevalence of parents reporting receiving a recommendation for adolescent HPV vaccination varied by state (range = 60%–91%). Supporting providers to give strong recommendations and effectively address parental concerns remains a priority, especially in states and rural areas where provider recommendations were less commonly reported. NIS-Teen is an annual survey that monitors vaccines received by adolescents aged 13–17 years in the 50 states, the District of Columbia, selected local areas, and U.S. territories. ¶ NIS-Teen is conducted among parents and guardians of eligible adolescents identified using a random-digit–dialed sample of cell phone numbers.** During the telephone interview, information is obtained on the sociodemographic characteristics of the teen and household, and contact information and consent to contact the teen’s vaccination providers are requested. Vaccination providers identified during the interview are mailed a questionnaire requesting the vaccination history from the teen’s medical record. †† Vaccination coverage estimates are based on provider-reported vaccination histories. This report presents vaccination coverage estimates for 18,700 adolescents (8,928 [48%] females and 9,772 [52%] males) aged 13–17 years with adequate provider data. §§ The overall Council of American Survey Research Organizations response rate was 23.3%, and only 48.3% of adolescents with completed interviews had adequate provider data. Previously described NIS-Teen methodology, including methods for weighting and synthesizing provider-reported vaccination histories (https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/imz-managers/nis/downloads/NIS-TEEN-PUF17-DUG.pdf) was used. Beginning in 2018, NIS-Teen used a single-frame sample of cell phone lines. The landline telephone–sample frame that was used from 2006 through 2017 was dropped because of the declining number of landline-only households in the United States (https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/imz-managers/coverage/teenvaxview/pubs-presentations/dual-to-single-frame-teen.html). Data were weighted and analyzed to account for the complex sampling design. T-tests were used to assess vaccination coverage differences by survey year (2018 compared with 2017) and between demographic subgroups. P-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. SAS-callable SUDAAN (version 11; SAS Institute) was used to conduct all analyses. National Vaccination Coverage In 2018, 51.1% of adolescents aged 13–17 years were up to date with the HPV vaccine series, and 68.1% had received ≥1 dose of HPV vaccine (Table 1) (Figure). During 2017–2018, the increase in HPV vaccination coverage was attributable to increases among males only (increase of 4.4 percentage points in males who were up to date versus 0.6 in females). Coverage with ≥1 MenACWY dose increased by 1.5 percentage points to 86.6%. Among persons aged 17 years, coverage with ≥2 MenACWY doses increased by 6.5 percentage points to 50.8%. Coverage with ≥1 dose of MenB among persons aged 17 years was 17.2% (95% confidence interval = 14.9%–19.9%). No significant increases were observed for coverage with ≥3 hepatitis B doses; ≥2 measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine doses; and ≥1 and ≥2 varicella vaccine doses among adolescents without a history of varicella disease (Table 1). TABLE 1 Estimated coverage with selected vaccines and doses among adolescents aged 13–17* years, by age at interview — National Immunization Survey–Teen (NIS-Teen), United States, 2018 Vaccine Age at interview (yrs), % (95% CI)† Total 13 14 15 16 17 2018 2017 (n = 3,852) (n = 3,875) (n = 3,741) (n = 3,751) (n = 3,481) (n = 18,700) (n = 20,949) Tdap§ ≥1 dose 87.1 (85.0–89.0) 87.7 (85.4–89.7) 89.7 (87.8–91.4) 89.0 (87.1–90.6) 91.0 (89.5–92.4)¶ 88.9 (88.0–89.7) 88.7 (87.8–89.6) MenACWY** ≥1 dose 86.3 (84.2–88.1) 86.2 (84.0–88.1) 86.1 (83.7–88.2) 86.3 (84.0–88.3) 88.1 (86.3–89.6) 86.6 (85.6–87.5)†† 85.1 (84.2–86.1) ≥2 doses §§ NA NA NA NA 50.8 (47.7–53.8) 50.8 (47.7–53.8)†† 44.3 (41.4–47.2) HPV¶¶ vaccine All adolescents UTD*** 39.9 (37.0–42.9) 50.3 (47.3–53.2)¶ 54.0 (51.0–56.9)¶ 54.5 (51.5–57.5)¶ 57.5 (54.4–60.5)¶ 51.1 (49.8–52.5)†† 48.6 (47.3–49.9) ≥1 dose 62.6 (59.7–65.4) 66.9 (64.1–69.6)¶ 69.7 (66.9–72.3)¶ 71.2 (68.5–73.8)¶ 70.1 (67.3–72.8)¶ 68.1 (66.8–69.3)†† 65.5 (64.3–66.7) Females UTD 38.9 (35.0–42.9) 52.7 (48.5–56.8)¶ 54.7 (50.4–59.0)¶ 57.5 (53.3–61.6)¶ 66.0 (61.8–70.1)¶ 53.7 (51.8–55.6) 53.1 (51.2–55.0) ≥1 dose 61.1 (56.9–65.2) 68.6 (64.4–72.5)¶ 70.7 (66.5–74.5)¶ 73.5 (69.8–76.8)¶ 76.3 (72.2–80.0)¶ 69.9 (68.1–71.6) 68.6 (66.9–70.2) Males UTD 40.9 (36.5–45.3) 47.7 (43.6–51.8)¶ 53.2 (49.1–57.3)¶ 51.8 (47.5–56.1)¶ 50.0 (45.7–54.3)¶ 48.7 (46.8–50.6)†† 44.3 (42.6–46.0) ≥1 dose 64.0 (59.9–67.9) 65.1 (61.3–68.7) 68.7 (65.0–72.1) 69.2 (65.2–73.0) 64.7 (60.7–68.5) 66.3 (64.6–68.0)†† 62.6 (60.9–64.2) MenB ≥1 dose††† NA NA NA NA 17.2 (14.9–19.9) 17.2 (14.9–19.9) 14.5 (12.3–17.1) MMR ≥2 doses 93.5 (92.1–94.7) 93.0 (91.6–94.2) 91.8 (89.9–93.3) 90.5 (88.4–92.2)¶ 90.9 (89.2–92.4)¶ 91.9 (91.2–92.6) 92.1 (91.3–92.8) Hepatitis B vaccine ≥3 doses 93.1 (91.5–94.5) 93.0 (91.5–94.3) 91.6 (89.1–93.5) 91.1 (89.3–92.6) 91.8 (90.1–93.2) 92.1 (91.3–92.8) 91.9 (91.1–92.6) Varicella vaccine History of varicella disease§§§ 9.8 (8.1–11.9) 10.3 (8.5–12.4) 11.8 (10.0–13.9) 12.4 (10.7–14.3) 15.0 (13.2–17.1)¶ 11.9 (11.0–12.7)†† 13.2 (12.3–14.2) No history of varicella disease ≥1 dose vaccine 95.4 (94.2–96.5) 95.4 (94.2–96.3) 94.1 (92.1–95.6) 94.3 (92.7–95.5) 95.2 (93.9–96.3) 94.9 (94.3–95.4) 95.5 (94.8–96.1) ≥2 doses vaccine 92.1 (90.5–93.4) 91.3 (89.6–92.8) 89.8 (87.4–91.8) 86.6 (84.3–88.7)¶ 87.9 (85.4–90.1)¶ 89.6 (88.7–90.4) 88.6 (87.6–89.5) History of varicella or ≥2 vaccine doses 92.9 (91.4–94.1) 92.2 (90.6–93.5) 91.0 (88.9–92.7) 88.3 (86.2–90.1)¶ 89.7 (87.5–91.6)¶ 90.8 (90.0–91.6) 90.1 (89.3–90.9) Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; HPV = human papillomavirus; MenACWY = quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine; MenB = serogroup B meningococcal vaccine; MMR = measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine; NA = not applicable; Tdap = tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis vaccine; UTD = up-to-date. * Adolescents (N = 18,700) in the 2018 NIS-Teen were born January 2000–February 2006. † Estimates with 95% CIs >20 might be unreliable. § Includes percentages receiving Tdap vaccine at age ≥10 years. ¶ Statistically significant difference (p<0.05) in estimated vaccination coverage by age; reference group was adolescents aged 13 years. ** Includes percentages receiving MenACWY or meningococcal-unknown type vaccine. †† Statistically significant difference (p<0.05) compared with 2017 NIS-Teen estimates. §§ ≥2 doses of MenACWY or meningococcal-unknown type vaccine. Calculated only among adolescents who were aged 17 years at interview. Does not include adolescents who received 1 dose of MenACWY vaccine at age ≥16 years. ¶¶ HPV vaccine, 9-valent (9vHPV), quadrivalent (4vHPV), or bivalent (2vHPV). Percentages are reported among females and males combined (N = 18,700) and for females only (N = 8,928) and males only (N = 9,772). *** HPV UTD includes those with ≥3 doses, and those with 2 doses when the first HPV vaccine dose was initiated at age <15 years, and there was at least 5 months minus 4 days between the first and second dose. This update to the HPV recommendation occurred in December 2016 (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/65/wr/mm6549a5.htm). ††† ≥1 dose of MenB. Calculated only among adolescents aged 17 years at interview. Administered based on individual clinical decision. §§§ By parent/guardian report or provider records. FIGURE Estimated vaccination coverage with selected vaccines and doses* among adolescents aged 13–17 years, by survey year and Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommendations † — National Immunization Survey–Teen (NIS-Teen), § , ¶ United States, 2006–2018 Abbreviations: HPV = human papillomavirus vaccine; MenACWY = quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine; Tdap = tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis vaccine; UTD = up-to-date. * ≥1 dose Tdap at or after age 10 years; ≥1 dose MenACWY or meningococcal-unknown type vaccine; ≥2 doses MenACWY or meningococcal-unknown type vaccine, calculated only among adolescents aged 17 years at time of interview. Does not include adolescents who received their first and only dose of MenACWY at or after age 16 years; HPV vaccine, nine-valent (9vHPV), quadrivalent (4vHPV), or bivalent (2vHPV). HPV UTD includes those with ≥3 doses and those with 2 doses when the first HPV vaccine dose was initiated before age 15 years and at least 5 months minus 4 days elapsed between the first and second dose. † ACIP revised the recommended HPV vaccination schedule in late 2016. The recommendation changed from a 3-dose to 2-dose series with appropriate spacing between receipt of the first and second dose for immunocompetent adolescents initiating the series before the 15th birthday. Three doses are still recommended for adolescents initiating the series between the ages of 15 and 26 years. Because of the change in recommendation, the graph includes estimates for ≥3 doses HPV from 2011 to 2015 and the HPV UTD estimate from 2016 to 2018. The routine ACIP recommendation for HPV vaccination was made for females in 2006 and for males in 2011. Because HPV vaccination was not recommended for males until 2011, coverage for all adolescents was not measured before that year. § NIS-Teen implemented a revised adequate provider data definition (APD) in 2014 and retrospectively applied the revised APD definition to 2013 data. Estimates using different APD definitions might not be directly comparable. ¶ NIS-Teen moved from a dual landline and cell phone sampling frame to a single cell phone sample frame in 2018, and estimates using 2017 data were calculated two ways, using the dual frame and retrospectively using the single cell phone sampling frame. The figure is a line chart showing the estimated vaccination coverage with selected vaccines and doses among adolescents aged 13–17 years, by survey year and Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommendations in the United States, during 2006–2018, and using data from National Immunization Survey–Teen. Vaccination Coverage by Selected Characteristics Coverage for all measures of HPV and MenACWY vaccination and ≥2 varicella vaccine doses among adolescents without a history of varicella disease were lower among adolescents living in non-MSA areas than in those living in MSA principal cities (Table 2). The largest differences were in HPV up-to-date status (15.4 percentage point difference) and ≥2-dose MenACWY coverage (19.7 percentage point difference). Coverage differences between adolescents living in MSA nonprincipal cities and MSA principal cities were observed for HPV vaccination measures (5.3 and 7.0 percentage point differences for receipt of ≥1 dose and being up-to-date, respectively) and ≥3 hepatitis B doses (1.7 percentage points). Compared with adolescents with private health insurance, those with Medicaid had higher HPV vaccination coverage (8.8 and 5.5 percentage points higher for receipt of ≥1 dose and being up-to-date, respectively) (Table 2). Uninsured adolescents had lower vaccination coverage, with differences ranging from 4.4 percentage points (≥1 varicella vaccine dose) to 18.7 percentage points (≥2 MenACWY doses) lower than did adolescents with private insurance. Vaccination coverage estimates also differed by race/ethnicity (Supplementary Table 1, https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/80676); poverty level (Supplementary Table 2, https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/80677); and jurisdiction (Supplementary Table 3, https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/80678). During 2014–2018, ≥1dose-HPV vaccination coverage increased an average of 4.4 percentage points per year nationally. (Supplementary Table 4, https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/80679). TABLE 2 Estimated vaccination coverage with selected vaccines and doses among adolescents* aged 13–17 years by metropolitan statistical area † and health insurance status § — National Immunization Survey–Teen (NIS-Teen), United States, 2018 Vaccine MSA% (95% CI)¶ Health insurance status % (95% CI)¶ Non-MSA MSA nonprincipal city MSA principal city Private insurance only Any Medicaid Other insurance Uninsured (n = 3,593) (n = 7,543) (n = 7,564) (n = 10,404) (n = 5,999) (n = 1,516) (n = 781) Tdap** ≥1 dose 86.8 (84.8–88.5) 89.7 (88.4–90.8) 88.6 (87.1–89.9) 90.1 (89.0–91.2) 88.2 (86.6–89.6) †† 85.6 (82.3–88.3) †† 85.1 (80.7–88.6) †† MenACWY§§ ≥1 dose 79.5 (77.3–81.6) †† 88.3 (87.1–89.4) 86.5 (84.7–88.0) 87.6 (86.4–88.8) 86.5 (84.8–88.0) 84.3 (81.1–87.0) †† 78.3 (72.7–83.0) †† ≥2 doses¶¶ 34.6 (28.5–41.2) †† 51.5 (46.7–56.2) 54.3 (49.7–58.9) 52.8 (48.6–56.9) 52.4 (46.9–57.8) 38.6 (30.0–48.0) †† 34.1 (21.6–49.4) †† HPV*** vaccine UTD††† 40.7 (38.1–43.5) †† 49.1 (47.1–51.0) †† 56.1 (53.9–58.3) 50.2 (48.4–52.0) 55.7 (53.4–58.1) †† 45.1 (40.9–49.3) †† 35.5 (30.1–41.4) †† ≥1 dose 59.5 (56.8–62.2) †† 66.6 (64.8–68.4) †† 71.9 (69.8–73.9) 65.6 (63.8–67.3) 74.4 (72.3–76.3) †† 62.6 (58.5–66.5) 56.2 (50.1–62.2) †† MMR ≥2 doses 90.1 (88.1–91.8) 92.3 (91.2–93.2) 92.0 (90.8–93.1) 92.8 (91.9–93.6) 92.0 (90.6–93.1) 90.1 (87.3–92.3) †† 84.2 (78.6–88.5) †† Hepatitis B ≥3 vaccine doses 90.7 (88.8–92.4) 93.1 (92.1–94.0) †† 91.4 (89.9–92.6) 93.0 (91.9–93.9) 92.1 (90.8–93.3) 90.5 (87.8–92.6) 84.1 (78.5–88.4) †† Varicella vaccine History of varicella§§§ 15.0 (13.1–17.0) †† 10.6 (9.6–11.8) 12.4 (10.9–14.0) 9.8 (8.8–10.9) 13.4 (11.8–15.1) †† 13.8 (11.1–17.1) †† 20.4 (16.2–25.4) †† Among adolescents with no history of varicella disease ≥1 varicella vaccine dose 93.4 (91.5–94.9) 95.0 (94.1–95.8) 95.1 (94.0–96.0) 95.7 (94.9–96.3) 94.4 (93.2–95.4) 93.3 (90.7–95.1) †† 91.3 (86.0–94.7) †† ≥2 varicella vaccine doses 86.4 (84.1–88.4) †† 89.8 (88.3–91.1) 90.2 (88.8–91.4) 90.5 (89.3–91.7) 89.4 (87.8–90.8) 86.7 (83.4–89.4) †† 83.8 (77.6–88.5) †† History of varicella or ≥2 vaccine doses 88.5 (86.5–90.2) †† 90.9 (89.6–92.0) 91.4 (90.1–92.5) 91.5 (90.3–92.5) 90.8 (89.4–92.1) 88.5 (85.6–90.9) †† 87.1 (82.0–90.9) Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; HPV = human papillomavirus; MenACWY = quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine; MMR = measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine; MSA= metropolitan statistical area; Tdap = tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis vaccine; UTD = up-to-date. * Adolescents (N = 18,700) in the 2018 NIS-Teen were born January 2000–February 2006. † MSA status was determined based on household-reported county of residence, and was grouped into three categories: MSA principal city, MSA nonprincipal city, and non-MSA. MSA and principal city were as defined by the U.S. Census Bureau (https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/metro-micro.html). Non-MSA areas include urban populations not located within an MSA as well as completely rural areas. § Adolescents' health insurance status was reported by parent or guardian. “Other insurance” includes the Children’s Health Insurance Program, military insurance, Indian Health Service, and any other type of health insurance not mentioned elsewhere. ¶ Estimates with CIs >20 might be unreliable. ** Includes percentages receiving Tdap vaccine at age ≥10 years. †† Statistically significant difference (p<0.05) in estimated vaccination coverage by MSA or health insurance status. The referent groups were adolescents living in MSA principal city areas and adolescents with private insurance only, respectively. §§ Includes percentages receiving MenACWY and meningococcal-unknown type vaccine. ¶¶ ≥2 doses of MenACWY or meningococcal-unknown type vaccine. Calculated only among adolescents aged 17 years at interview. Does not include adolescents who received 1 dose of MenACWY vaccine at age ≥16 years. *** HPV vaccine, nine-valent (9vHPV), quadrivalent (4vHPV), or bivalent (2vHPV) in females and males combined. ††† HPV UTD includes those with ≥3 doses, and those with 2 doses when the first HPV vaccine dose was initiated at age <15 years, and there was at least 5 months minus 4 days between the first and second dose. This update to the HPV recommendation occurred in December 2016 (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/65/wr/mm6549a5.htm). §§§ By parent/guardian report or provider records. Provider Recommendation for HPV Vaccination Overall, 77.5% of parents reported receiving a provider recommendation for adolescent HPV vaccination; prevalence varied by state, ranging from 59.5% in Mississippi to 90.7% in Massachusetts (Supplementary Figure, https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/80682) (Supplementary Table 5, https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/80680). Nationally, ≥1-dose HPV vaccination coverage was higher among adolescents whose parents reported receiving a provider recommendation (74.7%) than among those whose parents reported not receiving a provider recommendation (46.7%) (Supplementary Table 5, https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/80680). Fewer parents living in non-MSA areas reported receiving a provider recommendation than did those living in MSA principal cities (70.3% versus 77.4%) (Supplementary Table 6, https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/80681). Discussion In 2018, U.S. adolescent vaccination coverage with ≥1 and ≥2 doses of MenACWY, ≥1 dose of HPV vaccine and being up-to-date with HPV vaccination continued to improve. Coverage with ≥1 Tdap dose remains high but appears to have stabilized. Although HPV vaccination coverage improved, increases among all adolescents were modest compared with increases in previous years and were observed only among males. Since 2011, ¶¶ coverage has increased gradually among females and more rapidly among males. However, only approximately half of adolescents have been fully vaccinated for HPV. HPV vaccination coverage was higher among adolescents whose parent reported receiving a provider recommendation. Thus, the provider recommendation continues to be a strong predictor of HPV vaccination ( 3 , 4 ). However, even when a provider recommendation was given, only 75% accepted the vaccine, suggesting that there are other reasons adolescents are not being vaccinated. Equipping providers with the tools they need to give strong recommendations that emphasize the importance of HPV vaccination in preventing cancer and effectively address parental concerns is a priority, especially in states where provider recommendations were less commonly reported. Resources on the importance of HPV vaccination and videos demonstrating how to give a recommendation are available to facilitate discussion between providers, teens, and their parents (https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd/hpv/hcp/resources.html). Coverage disparities persisted for some vaccines by MSA status. The disparity in HPV vaccination coverage by MSA status is not well understood; however, the lower prevalence of provider recommendations in non-MSA areas might be a factor. In one study, parents and guardians in the rural South indicated that they did not have enough information on the vaccine or its purpose ( 5 ). Efforts to ensure that rural health care providers have the resources and training necessary to educate parents and guardians about the benefits of HPV vaccination as a cancer prevention tool might increase the number of adolescents protected against diseases caused by HPV. Vaccination coverage was significantly lower among uninsured adolescents than among those with private insurance. Adolescents without health insurance are eligible to receive vaccines through the Vaccines for Children (VFC) program.*** Lack of parental awareness of ( 6 ) and misconceptions about the program, including that it is only for infants and younger children, might serve as barriers ( 7 ). Increasing parental awareness and knowledge of the VFC program should improve vaccination coverage among uninsured adolescents. Providers can assist by ensuring that their health care practice routinely screen patients for eligibility and counsel families about the VFC program. The findings in this report are subject to at least seven limitations. First, the overall Council of American Survey Research Organizations response rate was low, and fewer than half of adolescents with completed interviews had adequate provider data. Second, bias in estimates might remain even after adjustment for household and provider nonresponse and landline-only and phoneless households. ††† Third, changes in estimates of vaccination coverage from 2017 to 2018 should be interpreted with caution, given the transition from dual landline- and cellular- to single-cellular telephone-sampling frame in 2018. Fourth, estimates stratified by jurisdiction might be unreliable because of small sample sizes. Fifth, multiple statistical tests were conducted, and a small number might be significant because of chance alone. Sixth, coverage with ≥2 doses of MenACWY and ≥1 dose of MenB might be underestimated because MenB and second MenACWY dose may be administered at age >17 years ( 1 ), and NIS-Teen includes adolescents aged 13–17 years. Finally, the “provider recommendation” variable is based on parental report and thus subject to recall bias. It is encouraging that HPV vaccination coverage among boys continues to increase; however, the lack of an increase among girls is concerning. In the United States, an estimated 34,800 cases of cancer caused by HPV occur each year; 32,100 (92%), including 59% among women, would be preventable by the 9-valent HPV vaccine ( 8 ). Although, HPV vaccination has resulted in large declines in the prevalence of vaccine type HPV infections among adolescent girls and young adults ( 9 ), as well as decreases in cervical precancers ( 10 ), continuing to improve HPV vaccination coverage for all adolescents, male and female, will ensure they are protected from HPV infection and diseases caused by HPV, including cancers. Summary What is already known about this topic? Vaccines are recommended for adolescents to prevent diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus, meningococcal disease, and cancers caused by human papillomavirus (HPV). What is added by this report? In 2018, adolescent vaccination coverage in the United States continued to improve for meningococcal and HPV vaccines (primarily from increases among boys) and remains high for tetanus and reduced diphtheria toxoids and acellular pertussis vaccine. Adolescents whose parents reported having received a provider recommendation were more likely to have received HPV vaccination compared with adolescents whose parents did not report a provider recommendation. What are the implications for public health care? Providing parents and guardians with information and strong, high-quality recommendations are valuable tools for improving HPV vaccination and preventing HPV infection and diseases caused by HPV, including cancers.

          Related collections

          Most cited references7

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          National, Regional, State, and Selected Local Area Vaccination Coverage Among Adolescents Aged 13–17 Years — United States, 2017

          The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommends routine vaccination of persons aged 11–12 years with human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine (MenACWY), and tetanus and reduced diphtheria toxoids and acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap). A booster dose of MenACWY is recommended at age 16 years ( 1 ), and catch-up vaccination is recommended for hepatitis B vaccine (HepB), measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine (MMR), and varicella vaccine (VAR) for adolescents whose childhood vaccinations are not up to date (UTD) ( 1 ). ACIP also recommends that clinicians may administer a serogroup B meningococcal vaccine (MenB) series to adolescents and young adults aged 16–23 years, with a preferred age of 16–18 years ( 2 ). To estimate U.S. adolescent vaccination coverage, CDC analyzed data from the 2017 National Immunization Survey–Teen (NIS-Teen) for 20,949 adolescents aged 13–17 years.* During 2016–2017, coverage increased for ≥1 dose of HPV vaccine (from 60.4% to 65.5%), ≥1 dose of MenACWY (82.2% to 85.1%), and ≥2 doses of MenACWY (39.1% to 44.3%). Coverage with Tdap remained stable at 88.7%. In 2017, 48.6% of adolescents were UTD with the HPV vaccine series (HPV UTD) compared with 43.4% in 2016. † On-time vaccination (receipt of ≥2 or ≥3 doses of HPV vaccine by age 13 years) also increased. As in 2016, ≥1-dose HPV vaccination coverage was lower among adolescents living in nonmetropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) (59.3%) than among those living in MSA principal cities (70.1%). § Although HPV vaccination initiation remains lower than coverage with MenACWY and Tdap, HPV vaccination coverage has increased an average of 5.1 percentage points annually since 2013, indicating that continued efforts to target unvaccinated teens and eliminate missed vaccination opportunities might lead to HPV vaccination coverage levels comparable to those of other routinely recommended adolescent vaccines.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Parents Who Decline HPV Vaccination: Who Later Accepts and Why?

            Objective Parental declination contributes to low human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination coverage among US adolescents, resulting in missed opportunities for cancer prevention. We sought to characterize parents’ acceptance of HPV vaccination after declination (“secondary acceptance”). Methods In September 2016, we conducted an online survey with a national sample of parents of children ages 11 to 17 years. For those who reported having ever declined HPV vaccination for their children (n = 494), our survey assessed whether they accepted the vaccine at a subsequent visit. We used multivariable logistic regression to assess correlates of secondary acceptance. Results Overall, 45% of parents reported secondary acceptance of HPV vaccination, and an additional 24% intended to vaccinate in the next 12 months. In multivariable analyses, secondary acceptance was associated with receiving follow-up counseling about HPV vaccination from a health care provider (odds ratio, 2.16; 95% confidence interval, 1.42–3.28). However, only 53% of parents overall reported receiving such counseling. Secondary acceptance was also associated with receiving a higher quality HPV vaccine recommendation from a provider during the initial discussion and greater satisfaction with provider communication, as well as higher vaccination confidence. Among the reasons for secondary acceptance, parents most commonly reported the child getting older (45%), learning more about HPV vaccine (34%), and receiving a provider recommendation (33%). Conclusions Our findings suggest secondary acceptance of HPV vaccination is common, with more than two-thirds of parents in this national sample accepting or intending to accept HPV vaccination after declination. Providers should seek to motivate secondary acceptance by delivering repeated, high-quality recommendations for HPV vaccination.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Barriers and facilitators to HPV vaccination among rural Alabama adolescents and their caregivers

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep
                MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep
                WR
                Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
                Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
                0149-2195
                1545-861X
                23 August 2019
                23 August 2019
                : 68
                : 33
                : 718-723
                Affiliations
                Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC; Division of Viral Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC; Leidos Health, Inc., Atlanta, Georgia.
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Tanja Y. Walker, tywalker@ 123456cdc.gov , 404-718-8569.
                Article
                mm6833a2
                10.15585/mmwr.mm6833a2
                6705894
                31437143
                947cb983-c621-45dd-be25-9509cb8649d0

                All material in the MMWR Series is in the public domain and may be used and reprinted without permission; citation as to source, however, is appreciated.

                History
                Categories
                Full Report

                Comments

                Comment on this article