1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Sex-related differences in stemless total shoulder arthroplasty

      research-article
      , MBBS, MSc, FRCSC a , , MD, MSc, FRCSC b , , MD c , , MD d , , MD e , , MD, FRCSC a ,
      JSES International
      Elsevier
      Stemless, Shoulder arthroplasty, Sex, Osteoarthritis, Male, Female, Canal-sparing, Shoulder replacement

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The use of stemless humeral implants for shoulder arthroplasty is becoming increasingly widespread. However, little is known about the difference in clinical, functional, and radiographic outcomes of stemless shoulder arthroplasty between men and women. Men and women do have reported differences in size, strength, and bone quality. As such, the purpose of this study was to evaluate sex-related differences in outcomes when using stemless humeral implants.

          Methods

          A retrospective review of 227 patients (men = 143 and women = 84) undergoing stemless shoulder arthroplasty was compared for sex-related differences. Clinical, functional, and radiographic outcomes were compared, including American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores, visual analog scale pain scores, range of motion, radiolucencies, operative data, implant data, and complications. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, t-tests, chi-square tests, and logistic regression.

          Results

          Preoperatively, men had a statistically significant greater range of motion of forward elevation ( P < .01), external rotation (ER) at adduction ( P = .04), ER at 90° abduction ( P = .03), and baseline ASES scores ( P < .01). At 2 years, there were no differences between men and women in ASES score ( P = .12), visual analog scale pain score ( P = .74), active ER ( P = .98), implant migration, or radiolucencies ( P > .99). Mean operating time was 9 minutes longer in male patients ( P < .01). There was no significant difference in surgical complications, including dislocation, fracture, infection, or loosening. The three-year revision-free survival was 98.8% for women and 97.9% for men.

          Conclusion

          Patient sex is not predictive of postoperative functional outcomes after stemless shoulder arthroplasty. The operative time was significantly shorter in female patients, and there was no significant difference in surgical complications between men and women.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Gender Disparities in Osteoporosis

          Osteoporosis is a growing health concern worldwide and its complications are as prevalent as other common chronic disease complications such as hypertension and diabetes. In this review, we will discuss the role of gender in osteoporosis, especially related to peak bone mass and maturation, rate of annual bone loss, screening, prevalence of osteoporosis and its related fractures, mortality after osteoporosis-related fracture, fracture risk predication using different technologies and the impact of gender on osteoporosis management.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Quantifying success after total shoulder arthroplasty: the minimal clinically important difference

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons subjective shoulder scale in patients with shoulder instability, rotator cuff disease, and glenohumeral arthritis.

              Outcomes assessment after the treatment of shoulder disorders has involved the use of various condition-specific outcome instruments. The purpose of this study was to determine the psychometric properties of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons subjective shoulder scale in patients with shoulder instability, rotator cuff disease, and glenohumeral arthritis. Test-retest reliability, internal consistency, content validity, criterion validity, construct validity, and responsiveness to change were determined for the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder scale within subsets of an overall study population of 455 patients with shoulder instability, 474 patients with rotator cuff disease, and 137 patients with glenohumeral arthritis. There was acceptable test-retest reliability for the overall American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder scale (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.94) and ten of eleven domains. There was acceptable internal consistency for patients with instability (Cronbach alpha = 0.61), rotator cuff disease (0.64), and arthritis (0.62). There were acceptable floor and ceiling effects for patients with instability (0% and 1.3%, respectively), rotator cuff disease (0% for both), and arthritis (0% for both). There was acceptable and appropriate criterion validity, with significant correlations (p 0.05) with the role-emotional, mental health, vitality, and social function domains. There was acceptable construct validity, with all twenty-three hypotheses demonstrating significance (p < 0.05), and acceptable responsiveness to change for patients with instability (standardized response mean, 0.93), rotator cuff disease (1.16), and arthritis (1.11). The use of outcome instruments with psychometric properties that have been vigorously established is essential. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons subjective shoulder scale demonstrated overall acceptable psychometric performance for outcomes assessment in patients with shoulder instability, rotator cuff disease, and glenohumeral arthritis.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                JSES Int
                JSES Int
                JSES International
                Elsevier
                2666-6383
                29 October 2021
                January 2022
                29 October 2021
                : 6
                : 1
                : 26-31
                Affiliations
                [a ]Roth|McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Center, Western University, London, ON, Canada
                [b ]Department of Surgery, Queen’s University, Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, ON, Canada
                [c ]Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Norton Healthcare, Louisville, KY, USA
                [d ]Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA
                [e ]Holy Cross Orthopedic Research Institute, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author: George S. Athwal, MD, FRCS, Roth|MacFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Centre, 268 Grosvenor St, London, ON N6A 4L6, Canada. gathwal@ 123456uwo.ca
                Article
                S2666-6383(21)00230-9
                10.1016/j.jseint.2021.09.008
                8811396
                35141672
                94358061-9041-484f-b55d-143fbd9dd16e
                © 2021 The Author(s)

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                Categories
                Shoulder
                Arthroplasty

                stemless,shoulder arthroplasty,sex,osteoarthritis,male,female,canal-sparing,shoulder replacement

                Comments

                Comment on this article