32
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Interictal burden attributable to episodic headache: findings from the Eurolight project

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Most primary headaches are episodic, and most estimates of the heavy disability burden attributed to headache derive from epidemiological data focused on the episodic subtypes of migraine and tension-type headache (TTH). These disorders give rise directly but intermittently to symptom burden. Nevertheless, people with these disorders may not be symptom-free between attacks. We analysed the Eurolight dataset for interictal burden.

          Methods

          Eurolight was a cross-sectional survey using modified cluster sampling from the adult population (18–65 years) in 10 countries of the European Union. We used data from nine. The questionnaire included headache-diagnostic questions based on ICHD-II and several question sets addressing impact, including interictal and cumulative burdens.

          Results

          There were 6455 participants with headache (male 2444 [37.9 %]). Interictal symptoms were reported by 26.0 % of those with migraine and 18.9 % with TTH: interictal anxiety by 10.6 % with migraine and avoidance (lifestyle compromise) by 14.8 %, both much more common than in TTH (3.1 % [OR 3.8] and 4.7 % [OR 3.5] respectively). Mean time spent in the interictal state was 317 days/year for migraine, 331 days/year for TTH. Those who were “rarely” or “never” in control of their headaches (migraine 15.2 %, TTH 9.6 %) had significantly raised odds of interictal anxiety, avoidance and other interictal symptoms. Among those with migraine, interictal anxiety increased markedly with headache intensity and frequency, avoidance less so but still significantly. Lost productive time was associated with high ORs (up to 5.3) of anxiety and avoidance.

          A third (32.9 %) with migraine and a quarter (26.7 %) with TTH (difference: p < 0.0001) were reluctant to tell others of their headaches. About 10 % with each disorder felt families and friends did not understand their headaches. Nearly 12 % with migraine reported their employers and colleagues did not.

          Regarding cumulative burden, 11.8 % reported they had done less well in education because of headache, 5.9 % reported reduced earnings and 7.4 % that their careers had suffered.

          Conclusions

          Interictal burden in those with episodic headache is common, more so in migraine than TTH. Some elements have the potential to be profoundly consequential. New methodology is needed to measure interictal burden if descriptions of headache burden are to be complete.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The International Classification of Headache Disorders: 2nd edition.

          (2004)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            The impact of headache in Europe: principal results of the Eurolight project

            Background European data, at least from Western Europe, are relatively good on migraine prevalence but less sound for tension-type headache (TTH) and medication-overuse headache (MOH). Evidence on impact of headache disorders is very limited. Eurolight was a data-gathering exercise primarily to inform health policy in the European Union (EU). This manuscript reports personal impact. Methods The study was cross-sectional with modified cluster sampling. Surveys were conducted by structured questionnaire, including diagnostic questions based on ICHD-II and various measures of impact, and are reported from Austria, France, Germany, Italy, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Spain and United Kingdom. Different methods of sampling were used in each. The full methodology is described elsewhere. Results Questionnaires were analysed from 8,271 participants (58% female, mean age 43.4 y). Participation-rates, where calculable, varied from 10.6% to 58.8%. Moderate interest-bias was detected. Unadjusted lifetime prevalence of any headache was 91.3%. Gender-adjusted 1-year prevalences were: any headache 78.6%; migraine 35.3%; TTH 38.2%, headache on ≥15 d/mo 7.2%; probable MOH 3.1%. Personal impact was high, and included ictal symptom burden, interictal burden, cumulative burden and impact on others (partners and children). There was a general gradient of probable MOH > migraine > TTH, and most measures indicated higher impact among females. Lost useful time was substantial: 17.7% of males and 28.0% of females with migraine lost >10% of days; 44.7% of males and 53.7% of females with probable MOH lost >20%. Conclusions The common headache disorders have very high personal impact in the EU, with important implications for health policy.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              The methodology of population surveys of headache prevalence, burden and cost: Principles and recommendations from the Global Campaign against Headache

              The global burden of headache is very large, but knowledge of it is far from complete and needs still to be gathered. Published population-based studies have used variable methodology, which has influenced findings and made comparisons difficult. Among the initiatives of the Global Campaign against Headache to improve and standardize methods in use for cross-sectional studies, the most important is the production of consensus-based methodological guidelines. This report describes the development of detailed principles and recommendations. For this purpose we brought together an expert consensus group to include experience and competence in headache epidemiology and/or epidemiology in general and drawn from all six WHO world regions. The recommendations presented are for anyone, of whatever background, with interests in designing, performing, understanding or assessing studies that measure or describe the burden of headache in populations. While aimed principally at researchers whose main interests are in the field of headache, they should also be useful, at least in parts, to those who are expert in public health or epidemiology and wish to extend their interest into the field of headache disorders. Most of all, these recommendations seek to encourage collaborations between specialists in headache disorders and epidemiologists. The focus is on migraine, tension-type headache and medication-overuse headache, but they are not intended to be exclusive to these. The burdens arising from secondary headaches are, in the majority of cases, more correctly attributed to the underlying disorders. Nevertheless, the principles outlined here are relevant for epidemiological studies on secondary headaches, provided that adequate definitions can be not only given but also applied in questionnaires or other survey instruments.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                t.steiner@imperial.ac.uk
                Journal
                J Headache Pain
                J Headache Pain
                The Journal of Headache and Pain
                Springer Milan (Milan )
                1129-2369
                1129-2377
                16 February 2016
                16 February 2016
                2016
                : 17
                : 9
                Affiliations
                [ ]Headache Medical Center, Linz, Austria
                [ ]Department of Neurogeriatric Medicine and Remobilisation, Hospital of the Sisters of Charity, Linz, Austria
                [ ]Department of Neuroscience, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
                [ ]Norwegian Advisory Unit on Headache, St Olavs University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
                [ ]Headache Science Centre, C Mondino National Neurological Institute, Pavia, Italy
                [ ]Department of Brain and Behavioural Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
                [ ]Department of Neurology, University of Duisberg-Essen, Essen, Germany
                [ ]Department of Neurology, Evangelical Hospital Unna, Unna, Germany
                [ ]Department of Neurology, Hospital Clinico Universitario, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
                [ ]Departement d’Evaluation et Traitement de la Douleur, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Nice, Nice, France
                [ ]INSERM/UdA, U1107, Neuro-Dol, Clermont-Ferrand, France
                [ ]Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
                [ ]Asociacion Española de Pacientes con Cefalea (AEPAC), Valencia, Spain
                [ ]Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
                [ ]Department of Population Health, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Strassen, Luxembourg
                [ ]Division of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK
                Article
                599
                10.1186/s10194-016-0599-8
                4754227
                26879832
                93cb5d53-06a2-45c7-9765-3deedcf7b7ad
                © Lampl et al. 2016

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                : 3 December 2015
                : 2 February 2016
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2016

                Anesthesiology & Pain management
                headache,migraine,tension-type headache,interictal burden,public health,europe,eurolight project,global campaign against headache

                Comments

                Comment on this article