9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      43. LONG-TERM OUTCOMES FOLLOWING FREE VASCULARIZED FIBULA PHYSEAL TRANSFER FOR PROXIMAL HUMERUS ONCOLOGIC RECONSTRUCTION IN CHILDREN: AN INTERNATIONAL MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL STUDY

      abstract

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          PURPOSE: Vascularized fibula epiphyseal flap was first described in 1998 for proximal humeral reconstruction in children/infants. The authors aim to review their international, multi-institutional long-term outcomes. METHODS: An international, multi-institutional review (2004-2020) was conducted of patients <18 years of age undergoing free vascularized fibula epiphyseal transfer for proximal humeral reconstruction. Donor/recipient site complications, shoulder motion, pain, and final ambulatory status were reviewed. Growth of the transferred bone was assessed under the guidance of a pediatric musculoskeletal radiologist. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were included with a median age of 7 years (range 2-13 years). Average follow-up was 120 ± 87.4 months. There were two flap failures (7.4%). Recipient site complications included fracture (n=11, 40.7%), avascular necrosis of the fibula head (n=1, 3.7%), fibular head avulsion (n=1, 3.7%), infection (n=1, 3.7%), hardware failure (n=1, 3.7%). Operative fixation was necessary in one patient with a fracture. The case of infection necessitated fibula explantation 2 years post-operatively, and ultimately prosthetic reconstruction. Sixteen patients suffered peroneal nerve palsy (59.3%): thirteen of these cases resolved within a year (81% recovery), and 3 were permanent. One patient (3.7%) complained of upper extremity pain. Longitudinal growth was confirmed in all but 3 cases (n=24, 88.9%) at an average rate of 0.83 ± 0.25 cm/year. CONCLUSION: The vascularized fibula epiphysis for proximal humerus reconstruction in children preserves the potential for future growth and an articular surface for motion. Peroneal nerve palsy is common following harvest, although this is often transient. Future efforts should be geared towards reducing post-operative morbidity.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open
          Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open
          GOX
          Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
          Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (Hagerstown, MD )
          2169-7574
          01 April 2022
          April 2022
          : 10
          : 4 Suppl , AAPS 2022 Abstract Supplement
          : 22
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, NY, USA
          [2 ]Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
          [3 ]Northwell, New York, NY, USA
          [4 ]Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
          [5 ]University of Pennysylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
          [6 ]University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
          [7 ]University of Florence, Florence, Italy
          Article
          00045
          10.1097/01.GOX.0000828160.11528.78
          8984260
          9305b58e-c5f0-4c70-857a-51365d4664a8
          Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.

          This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.

          History
          Categories
          Oral Presentations
          Abstracts
          Custom metadata
          TRUE

          Comments

          Comment on this article

          scite_
          0
          0
          0
          0
          Smart Citations
          0
          0
          0
          0
          Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
          View Citations

          See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

          scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

          Similar content3,213