Evaluation of cystatin C in malignancy and comparability of estimates of GFR in oncology patients

Abstract

Objectives

Creatinine is the biomarker of choice for use in estimates of kidney function in oncology patients. However as non-renal factors such as muscle mass can influence creatinine concentrations, we evaluated cystatin C as an alternative biomarker and its incorporation in GFR estimating formulae in an oncology setting. Measured GFR is infrequently undertaken in adult clinical practice with the consequent reliance on calculated GFR for patient assessment.

Design and methods

Cystatin C and creatinine concentrations were evaluated from 134 oncology patients prior to commencing chemotherapeutic cycles. Estimates of creatinine clearance (Cockroft-Gault) and GFR (using Hoek, Jonsson, MDRD and CKD-EPI) were evaluated. Cystatin C-based GFR estimates (using CKD-EPI CysC and CKD-EPI SCr/CysC) were compared with the creatinine-based GFR estimates (CG, MDRD and CKD-EPI SCr) within the GFR ranges of 60–89, 45–59 and ≤44 mL/min/1.73 m2.

Results

Cystatin C concentrations were significantly higher in oncology patients both prior to commencing chemotherapy (F: P<0.01 and M: P<0.0001) and during cycles of treatment (F: P<0.0001 and M: P<0.01) when compared with a reference population. Cystatin C concentrations also increased significantly during chemotherapy (P<0.0001) in a subset of female patients evaluated. Poor agreement (average 42%) was demonstrated between CKD-EPI CysC and creatinine-based GFR estimates within the investigated GFR ranges, with improved agreement (average 55%) when using the combined CKD-EPI SCr/CysC formula.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated a malignancy and treatment-mediated effect on cystatin C measures, which may confound its clinical utility in estimating GFR in oncology patients.