2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Atypical B cells in chronic infectious diseases and systemic autoimmunity: puzzles with many missing pieces

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The world’s struggle to contain the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic, primarily through vaccination, has highlighted the importance of better understanding the biology of B cells that participate in defense against infectious diseases, both acute and chronic. Here, we focus on a population of human B cells, termed atypical B cells (ABCs), that comprise a distinct B-cell lineage that differentiates from naive B cells in an interferon-γ-driven process, and are infrequent in healthy individuals but significantly expanded in chronic infectious diseases, including malaria, as well as in systemic autoimmune diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Recent comparisons of ABCs by single-cell RNAseq provided evidence that ABCs in diverse chronic infectious diseases and in systemic autoimmune diseases are highly related and share common drivers of differentiation and expansion. However, ABCs in different diseases are not identical and also show discrete disease-specific features. Here, we compare and contrast key features of two ABC populations, namely those that are expanded in individuals living in malaria-endemic areas of the world versus those in SLE patients. This comparison is of interest as it appears that unique features of these two diseases result in participation of autoreactive ABCs in parasite-specific responses in malaria but in pathogenic autoimmune responses in SLE. A better understanding of the commonality and differences in the ABC responses in these two diseases may provide critical insights into the development of vaccines that drive pathogen-specific antibody responses and avoid autoimmunity.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Distinct Effector B Cells Induced by Unregulated Toll-like Receptor 7 Contribute to Pathogenic Responses in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

          Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is characterized by B-cells lacking IgD and CD27 (double negative; DN). We show that DN cell expansions reflected a subset of CXCR5 − CD11c + cells (DN2) representing pre-plasma cells (PC). DN2 cells predominated in African-American patients with active disease and nephritis, anti-Smith and anti-RNA autoantibodies. They expressed a T-bet transcriptional network; increased toll-like receptor-7 (TLR7); lacked the negative TLR regulator TRAF5; and were hyper-responsive to TLR7. DN2 cells shared with activated naïve cells (aNAV), phenotypic and functional features, and similar transcriptomes. Their PC differentiation and autoantibody production was driven by TLR7 in an interleukin-21 (IL-21)-mediated fashion. An in vivo developmental link between aNAV, DN2 cells and PC was demonstrated by clonal sharing. This study defines a distinct differentiation fate of autoreactive naïve B cells into PC precursors with hyper-responsiveness to innate stimuli, as well as establishes prominence of extra-follicular B-cell activation in SLE, and identifies therapeutic targets. The role of extrafollicular B cells in human systemic lupus is unknown. Jenks et al . define the main components of this pathway and its prominence in severe disease. Its activation is mediated by hyper-responsiveness to toll-like receptor-7 and leads to the generation of autoreactive antibody-secreting plasmablasts.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The immune cell landscape in kidneys of patients with lupus nephritis

            Lupus nephritis is a potentially fatal autoimmune disease for which the current treatment is ineffective and often toxic. To develop mechanistic hypotheses of disease, we analyzed kidney samples from patients with lupus nephritis and from healthy control subjects using single-cell RNA sequencing. Our analysis revealed 21 subsets of leukocytes active in disease, including multiple populations of myeloid cells, T cells, natural killer cells and B cells that demonstrated both pro-inflammatory responses and inflammation-resolving responses. We found evidence of local activation of B cells correlated with an age-associated B-cell signature and evidence of progressive stages of monocyte differentiation within the kidney. A clear interferon response was observed in most cells. Two chemokine receptors, CXCR4 and CX3CR1, were broadly expressed, implying a potentially central role in cell trafficking. Gene expression of immune cells in urine and kidney was highly correlated, which would suggest that urine might serve as a surrogate for kidney biopsies.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Predominant autoantibody production by early human B cell precursors.

              During B lymphocyte development, antibodies are assembled by random gene segment reassortment to produce a vast number of specificities. A potential disadvantage of this process is that some of the antibodies produced are self-reactive. We determined the prevalence of self-reactive antibody formation and its regulation in human B cells. A majority (55 to 75%) of all antibodies expressed by early immature B cells displayed self-reactivity, including polyreactive and anti-nuclear specificities. Most of these autoantibodies were removed from the population at two discrete checkpoints during B cell development. Inefficient checkpoint regulation would lead to substantial increases in circulating autoantibodies.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Curr Opin Immunol
                Curr Opin Immunol
                Current Opinion in Immunology
                The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
                0952-7915
                1879-0372
                17 June 2022
                August 2022
                17 June 2022
                : 77
                : 102227
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Laboratory of Immunogenetics, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA
                [2 ]Rheumatology Fellowship and Training Branch, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
                Author notes
                [*]

                These authors contributed equally.

                Article
                S0952-7915(22)00074-7 102227
                10.1016/j.coi.2022.102227
                9612402
                35724448
                91b63c67-852a-4133-871a-510b47597169
                © 2022 The Authors

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                Categories
                Review

                Immunology
                Immunology

                Comments

                Comment on this article