5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Augmented Reality-Assisted Periosteum Pedicled Flap Harvesting for Head and Neck Reconstruction: An Anatomical and Clinical Viability Study of a Galeo-Pericranial Flap

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Head and neck reconstructive surgeons have recently explored new perspectives in bone restoration using periosteum carrier flaps. Following this idea, we explored the possibility of harvesting a galeo-pericranial flap. The present work studies the vascular supply of the pericranial temporo-parietal region in order to assess the possibility of harvesting a galeo-pericranial flap based on the superficial temporalis vascularization. Anatomical dissections were performed at the Anatomical Institute of the University of Bologna on eight donor cadavers. Then we performed the harvesting of the flap in vivo on eight patients. We introduced augmented reality (AR) to facilitate anatomical visualisation during free flap harvesting. Augmented reality merges virtual and actual objects, allowing direct observation of patient anatomy and the surgical field. No post-operative major or minor complications occurred. We encountered no post-operative functional issues on the donor or recipient sites, and good clinical healing was observed in all patients. In conclusion, we believe that the galea-pericranium flap could represent a new donor site for the harvesting of a periosteum carrier flap.

          Related collections

          Most cited references12

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Reconstruction of the mandible with osseous free flaps: a 10-year experience with 150 consecutive patients.

          Osseous free flaps have become the preferred method for reconstructing segmental mandibular defects. Of 457 head and neck free flaps, 150 osseous mandible reconstructions were performed over a 10-year period. This experience was retrospectively reviewed to establish an approach to osseous free flap mandible reconstruction. There were 94 male and 56 female patients (mean age, 50 years; range 3 to 79 years); 43 percent had hemimandibular defects, and the rest had central, lateral, or a combination defect. Donor sites included the fibula (90 percent), radius (4 percent), scapula (4 percent), and ilium (2 percent). Rigid fixation (up to five osteotomy sites) was used in 98 percent of patients. Aesthetic and functional results were evaluated a minimum of 6 months postoperatively. The free flap success rate was 100 percent, and bony union was achieved in 97 percent of the osteotomy sites. Osseointegrated dental implants were placed in 20 patients. A return to an unrestricted diet was achieved in 45 percent of patients; 45 percent returned to a soft diet, and 5 percent were on a liquid diet. Five percent of patients required enteral feeding to maintain weight. Speech was assessed as normal (36 percent), near normal (27 percent), intelligible (28 percent), or unintelligible (9 percent). Aesthetic outcome was judged as excellent (32 percent), good (27 percent), fair (27 percent), or poor (14 percent). This study demonstrates a very high success rate, with good-to-excellent functional and aesthetic results using osseous free flaps for primary mandible reconstruction. The fibula donor site should be the first choice for most cases, particularly those with anterior or large bony defects requiring multiple osteotomies. Use of alternative donor sites (i.e., radius and scapula) is best reserved for cases with large soft-tissue and minimal bone requirements. The ilium is recommended only when other options are unavailable. Thoughtful flap selection and design should supplant the need for multiple, simultaneous free flaps and vein grafting in most cases.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The arterial anatomy of the temporal region and the vascular basis of various temporal flaps.

            The arterial anatomy of the temporal region was examined macroscopically and radiographically in 10 fresh cadavers which had been injected with lead oxide. The blood supply of the temporal region is derived from the superficial temporal, middle temporal, deep temporal, posterior auricular, transverse facial, zygomatico-orbital, zygomaticotemporal, zygomaticofacial, and middle meningeal arteries. The vascular network formed by these arteries can be divided into four arterial networks corresponding to the different layers of the temporal region. With a new understanding of the arterial networks and their anastomoses, the techniques for elevating various flaps in the temporal region are discussed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Combination of CAD/CAM and Augmented Reality in Free Fibula Bone Harvest

              Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Clin Med
                J Clin Med
                jcm
                Journal of Clinical Medicine
                MDPI
                2077-0383
                13 July 2020
                July 2020
                : 9
                : 7
                : 2211
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Oral and Maxillo-Facial Surgery Unit, IRCCS Policlinico di Sant’Orsola, Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), University of Bologna, 40100 Bologna, Italy; salbatt@ 123456yahoo.it (S.B.); claudio.marchetti@ 123456unibo.it (C.M.)
                [2 ]Human Anatomy, Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), University of Bologna, 40100 Bologna, Italy; stefano.ratti@ 123456unibo.it (S.R.); lucia.manzoli@ 123456unibo.it (L.M.); alessandra.ruggeri@ 123456unibo.it (A.R.)
                [3 ]Bioengineering Lab, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine—DIMES, University of Bologna, 40100 Bologna, Italy; laura.cercenelli@ 123456unibo.it (L.C.); emanuela.marcelli@ 123456unibo.it (E.M.)
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: achille.tarsitano2@ 123456unibo.it ; Tel.: +0039-0512142463
                [†]

                These Authors equally contributed to the manuscript and should be considered as co-first.

                [‡]

                These Authors should be considered as co-last.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5815-7591
                Article
                jcm-09-02211
                10.3390/jcm9072211
                7408700
                32668591
                912d537d-b3b3-4306-be37-84769479027f
                © 2020 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 29 May 2020
                : 09 July 2020
                Categories
                Article

                reconstruction,head and neck reconstruction,3d technologies,augmented reality,temporalis flap,periosteum flap

                Comments

                Comment on this article