14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Transsplenic portal vein recanalization and direct intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement to optimize liver transplantation

      case-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Percutaneous trans-splenic portal vein recanalization (PVR) has been reported for facilitation of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS), however has not been applied to patients undergoing direct intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (DIPS). We report the utilization of trans-splenic-PVR with DIPS creation in a patient with chronic portal and hepatic vein occlusions undergoing liver transplantation evaluation.

          Case presentation

          A 48-year-old male with decompensated alcoholic cirrhosis complicated by refractory ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, and variceal bleeding underwent CT that demonstrated chronic occlusion of the hepatic veins (HV), extrahepatic portal vein (PV), and superior mesenteric vein (SMV). Due to failed attempts at TIPS at outside institutions, interventional radiology was consulted for portal vein recanalization (PVR) with TIPS to treat the portal hypertension and ascites and also facilitate an end-to-end PV anastomosis at transplantation. After an initial hepatic venogram confirmed chronic HV occlusion, a DIPS with trans-splenic PVR was planned. The splenic vein was accessed under sonographic guidance using a micropuncture set and subsequently upsized to a 6 French sheath over a stiff guidewire. A splenic venogram via this access confirmed occlusion of the PV with drainage of the splenic vein (SV) through gastric varices. The thrombosed PV was then recanalized and angioplastied to restore PV flow via the transsplenic approach. A transjugular liver access kit with a modified 21-gauge needle was advanced into the IVC through the internal jugular vein (IJV) sheath and directed towards the target snare in PV. The needle was used to subsequently puncture the PV through the caudate lobe and facilitate placement of a wire into the SV. The initial portosystemic gradient (PSG) was 20 mmHg. The IJV sheath was advanced through the hepatic parenchymal tract into the main-PV and a stent-graft was placed across the main PV and into the IVC. A portal venogram demonstrated brisk blood flow through the DIPS, resolution of varices and a PSG of 8 mmHg. One month after the procedure, the patient had a significant reduction in ascites and MELD-NA score. Patient is currently listed and awaiting transplantation.

          Conclusions

          In the setting of chronically occluded portal and hepatic veins, trans-splenic PVR DIPS may serve as an effective bridge to liver transplantation by facilitating an end to end portal vein anastomosis.

          Related collections

          Most cited references5

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Portal Vein Thrombosis Is a Risk Factor for Poor Early Outcomes After Liver Transplantation: Analysis of Risk Factors and Outcomes for Portal Vein Thrombosis in Waitlisted Patients.

          Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is common in patients with cirrhosis, but the risk factors associated with PVT and its impact on outcomes following liver transplantation (LT) are not well defined. The objectives of this study were to determine the impact of PVT on post-LT patient and graft survival, waitlist outcomes, and the factors associated with PVT.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Pretransplant Portal Vein Recanalization-Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt in Patients With Complete Obliterative Portal Vein Thrombosis.

            Chronic, obliterative portal vein (PV) thrombosis (PVT) represents a relative contraindication to liver transplantation (LT) in some centers. When PV thromboembolectomy is not feasible, alternative techniques (portacaval hemitransposition, portal arterialization, multivisceral transplantation) are associated with suboptimal outcomes. In cases where a chronically thrombosed PV has become obliterated, we developed PV recanalization (PVR)-transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) to potentiate LT. We evaluated the impact of PVR-TIPS on liver function, transplant eligibility, and long-term outcomes after LT.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Portal Vein Recanalization and Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Creation for Chronic Portal Vein Thrombosis: Technical Considerations.

              Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is common in cirrhotic patients and presents a challenge at the time of transplant. Owing to the increased posttransplant morbidity and mortality associated with complete PVT, the presence of PVT is a relative contraindication to liver transplantation at many centers. Our group began performing portal vein (PV) recanalization and transjugular intrahepatic portostystemic shunt placement (PVR-TIPS) several years ago to optimize the transplant candidacy of patients with PVT. The procedure has evolved to include transsplenic access to assist with recanalization, which is now our preferred method due to its technical success without significant added morbidity. Here, we describe in detail our approach to PVR-TIPS with a focus on the transsplenic method. The procedure was attempted in 61 patients and was technically successful in 60 patients (98%). After transitioning to transsplenic access to assist with recanalization, the technical success rate has improved to 100%. The recanalized portal vein and TIPS have maintained patency during follow-up, or to the time of transplant, in 55 patients (92%) with a mean follow-up of 16.7 months. In total, 23 patients (38%) have undergone transplant, all of whom received a physiologic anastomosis (end-to-end anastomosis in 22 of 23 patients, 96%). PVR-TIPS placement should be considered as an option for patients with chronic PVT in need of transplantation. Transsplenic access makes the procedure technically straightforward and should be considered as the primary method for recanalization.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                osman1423@gmail.com
                abhijitlausalaskar@ymail.com
                Szangan@radiology.bsd.uchicago.edu
                Apillai1@medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu
                Tbaker1@surgery.bsd.uchicago.edu
                Journal
                CVIR Endovasc
                CVIR Endovasc
                CVIR Endovascular
                Springer International Publishing (Cham )
                2520-8934
                8 January 2020
                8 January 2020
                December 2020
                : 3
                : 5
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7822, GRID grid.170205.1, Section of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, , University of Chicago, ; Chicago, IL 60637 USA
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0453 1239, GRID grid.416632.4, Department of Interventional Radiology, , Amita Saint Francis Hospital, ; Evanston, IL 60202 USA
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7822, GRID grid.170205.1, Department of Gastroenterology, Section of Hepatology, , University of Chicago, ; Chicago, IL 60637 USA
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7822, GRID grid.170205.1, Department of Surgery, Section of Transplant Surgery, , University of Chicago, ; Chicago, IL 60637 USA
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2440-2437
                Article
                96
                10.1186/s42155-019-0096-7
                6966405
                32026045
                912b93b1-bce7-4fad-9024-344f4b71f80f
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                : 4 December 2019
                : 30 December 2019
                Categories
                Case Report
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2020

                portal vein recanalization,pvr,direct intrahepatic portosystemic shunt,dips,portal vein occlusion,hepatic vein occlusion,budd chiai syndrome

                Comments

                Comment on this article