28
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Response and resilience of Asian agrifood systems to COVID-19: An assessment across twenty-five countries and four regional farming and food systems

      research-article
      a , ao , * , b , c , d , e , f , g , h , i , j , k , l , c , m , n , o , p , q , r , s , t , u , d , v , w , x , y , r , z , aa , i , ab , a , ao , ac , ad , ae , af , ag , ah , ai , aj , ak , al , am , an , q
      Agricultural Systems
      Published by Elsevier Ltd.
      Resilience, Agrifood-systems, COVID-19, Gender, Markets, Policy

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Context

          The COVID-19 pandemic has been affecting health and economies across the world, although the nature of direct and indirect effects on Asian agrifood systems and food security has not yet been well understood.

          Objectives

          This paper assesses the initial responses of major farming and food systems to COVID-19 in 25 Asian countries, and considers the implications for resilience, food and nutrition security and recovery policies by the governments.

          Methods

          A conceptual systems model was specified including key pathways linking the direct and indirect effects of COVID-19 to the resilience and performance of the four principal Asian farming and food systems, viz, lowland rice based; irrigated wheat based; hill mixed; and dryland mixed systems. Based on this framework, a systematic survey of 2504 key informants (4% policy makers, 6% researchers or University staff, 6% extension workers, 65% farmers, and 19% others) in 20 Asian countries was conducted and the results assessed and analysed.

          Results and conclusion

          The principal Asian farming and food systems were moderately resilient to COVID-19, reinforced by government policies in many countries that prioritized food availability and affordability. Rural livelihoods and food security were affected primarily because of disruptions to local labour markets (especially for off-farm work), farm produce markets (notably for perishable foods) and input supply chains (i.e., seeds and fertilisers). The overall effects on system performance were most severe in the irrigated wheat based system and least severe in the hill mixed system, associated in the latter case with greater resilience and diversification and less dependence on external inputs and long market chains. Farming and food systems' resilience and sustainability are critical considerations for recovery policies and programmes, especially in relation to economic performance that initially recovered more slowly than productivity, natural resources status and social capital. Overall, the resilience of Asian farming and food systems was strong because of inherent systems characteristics reinforced by public policies that prioritized staple food production and distribution as well as complementary welfare programmes. With the substantial risks to plant- and animal-sourced food supplies from future zoonoses and the institutional vulnerabilities revealed by COVID-19, efforts to improve resilience should be central to recovery programmes.

          Significance

          This study was the first Asia-wide systems assessment of the effects of COVID-19 on agriculture and food systems, differentiating the effects of the pandemic across the four principal regional farming and food systems in the region.

          Graphical abstract

          Notes: Full lines denote direct effects; dashed lines indirect effects; and thickness of line denotes relative strength of effects.

          Related collections

          Most cited references87

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The SARS, MERS and novel coronavirus (COVID-19) epidemics, the newest and biggest global health threats: what lessons have we learned?

          Abstract Objectives To provide an overview of the three major deadly coronaviruses and identify areas for improvement of future preparedness plans, as well as provide a critical assessment of the risk factors and actionable items for stopping their spread, utilizing lessons learned from the first two deadly coronavirus outbreaks, as well as initial reports from the current novel coronavirus (COVID-19) epidemic in Wuhan, China. Methods Utilizing the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC, USA) website, and a comprehensive review of PubMed literature, we obtained information regarding clinical signs and symptoms, treatment and diagnosis, transmission methods, protection methods and risk factors for Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS), Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) and COVID-19. Comparisons between the viruses were made. Results Inadequate risk assessment regarding the urgency of the situation, and limited reporting on the virus within China has, in part, led to the rapid spread of COVID-19 throughout mainland China and into proximal and distant countries. Compared with SARS and MERS, COVID-19 has spread more rapidly, due in part to increased globalization and the focus of the epidemic. Wuhan, China is a large hub connecting the North, South, East and West of China via railways and a major international airport. The availability of connecting flights, the timing of the outbreak during the Chinese (Lunar) New Year, and the massive rail transit hub located in Wuhan has enabled the virus to perforate throughout China, and eventually, globally. Conclusions We conclude that we did not learn from the two prior epidemics of coronavirus and were ill-prepared to deal with the challenges the COVID-19 epidemic has posed. Future research should attempt to address the uses and implications of internet of things (IoT) technologies for mapping the spread of infection.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Offline: COVID-19 is not a pandemic

            As the world approaches 1 million deaths from COVID-19, we must confront the fact that we are taking a far too narrow approach to managing this outbreak of a new coronavirus. We have viewed the cause of this crisis as an infectious disease. All of our interventions have focused on cutting lines of viral transmission, thereby controlling the spread of the pathogen. The “science” that has guided governments has been driven mostly by epidemic modellers and infectious disease specialists, who understandably frame the present health emergency in centuries-old terms of plague. But what we have learned so far tells us that the story of COVID-19 is not so simple. Two categories of disease are interacting within specific populations—infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and an array of non-communicable diseases (NCDs). These conditions are clustering within social groups according to patterns of inequality deeply embedded in our societies. The aggregation of these diseases on a background of social and economic disparity exacerbates the adverse effects of each separate disease. COVID-19 is not a pandemic. It is a syndemic. The syndemic nature of the threat we face means that a more nuanced approach is needed if we are to protect the health of our communities. © 2020 Peter Scholey Partnership/Getty Images 2020 Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. The notion of a syndemic was first conceived by Merrill Singer, an American medical anthropologist, in the 1990s. Writing in The Lancet in 2017, together with Emily Mendenhall and colleagues, Singer argued that a syndemic approach reveals biological and social interactions that are important for prognosis, treatment, and health policy. Limiting the harm caused by SARS-CoV-2 will demand far greater attention to NCDs and socioeconomic inequality than has hitherto been admitted. A syndemic is not merely a comorbidity. Syndemics are characterised by biological and social interactions between conditions and states, interactions that increase a person's susceptibility to harm or worsen their health outcomes. In the case of COVID-19, attacking NCDs will be a prerequisite for successful containment. As our recently published NCD Countdown 2030 showed, although premature mortality from NCDs is falling, the pace of change is too slow. The total number of people living with chronic diseases is growing. Addressing COVID-19 means addressing hypertension, obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular and chronic respiratory diseases, and cancer. Paying greater attention to NCDs is not an agenda only for richer nations. NCDs are a neglected cause of ill-health in poorer countries too. In their Lancet Commission, published last week, Gene Bukhman and Ana Mocumbi described an entity they called NCDI Poverty, adding injuries to a range of NCDs—conditions such as snake bites, epilepsy, renal disease, and sickle cell disease. For the poorest billion people in the world today, NCDIs make up over a third of their burden of disease. The Commission described how the availability of affordable, cost-effective interventions over the next decade could avert almost 5 million deaths among the world's poorest people. And that is without considering the reduced risks of dying from COVID-19. © 2020 Allison Michael Orenstein/Getty Images 2020 Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. The most important consequence of seeing COVID-19 as a syndemic is to underline its social origins. The vulnerability of older citizens; Black, Asian, and minority ethnic communities; and key workers who are commonly poorly paid with fewer welfare protections points to a truth so far barely acknowledged—namely, that no matter how effective a treatment or protective a vaccine, the pursuit of a purely biomedical solution to COVID-19 will fail. Unless governments devise policies and programmes to reverse profound disparities, our societies will never be truly COVID-19 secure. As Singer and colleagues wrote in 2017, “A syndemic approach provides a very different orientation to clinical medicine and public health by showing how an integrated approach to understanding and treating diseases can be far more successful than simply controlling epidemic disease or treating individual patients.” I would add one further advantage. Our societies need hope. The economic crisis that is advancing towards us will not be solved by a drug or a vaccine. Nothing less than national revival is needed. Approaching COVID-19 as a syndemic will invite a larger vision, one encompassing education, employment, housing, food, and environment. Viewing COVID-19 only as a pandemic excludes such a broader but necessary prospectus. © 2020 xavierarnau/Getty Images 2020 Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              COVID-19 risks to global food security

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Agric Syst
                Agric Syst
                Agricultural Systems
                Published by Elsevier Ltd.
                0308-521X
                0308-521X
                29 June 2021
                October 2021
                29 June 2021
                : 193
                : 103168
                Affiliations
                [a ]Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
                [b ]Department of Agricultural Economics and Business Management, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka
                [c ]Sustainable Impact Platform, International Rice Research Institute, Los Banos, Laguna, Philippines
                [d ]School of Agriculture and Environment, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
                [e ]Peking University, Beijing, China
                [f ]International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
                [g ]Indian Council of Agricultural Research Research Complex for North-Eastern Hill Region, Tripura, India
                [h ]Fenner School of Environment & Society, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
                [i ]International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center, Dhaka, Bangladesh
                [j ]Sustainable Agricultural Development and Food Security, Amman, Jordan
                [k ]International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center, New Delhi, India
                [l ]Department of Agronomy, Sustainable Intensification Innovation Lab, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, USA
                [m ]Food and Agriculture Organisation, Islamabad, Pakistan
                [n ]Kyrgyz National Agrarian University, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan
                [o ]Kazakh Research Institute of Agriculture and Plant Growing, Almaty, Kazakhstan
                [p ]Regional Office for Central Asia and the South Caucasus, International Center for Biosaline Agriculture, Uzbekistan
                [q ]Institute for Study and Development Worldwide, Sydney, Australia
                [r ]University of the Philippines Mindanao, Davao City, Philippines
                [s ]Nusa Cendana University, Kupang, Indonesia
                [t ]International Center for Research and Education in Agriculture, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan
                [u ]WorldFish, Batu Maung, Penang, Malaysia
                [v ]Alliance of Bioversity International and International Center for Tropical Agriculture, Vientiane, Laos
                [w ]School of Life Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester, United Kingdom
                [x ]Graduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan
                [y ]International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center, Chiang Mai, Thailand
                [z ]Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China
                [aa ]Agricultural Economics Division, Bangladesh Rice Research Institute, Gazipur, Bangladesh
                [ab ]World Vegetable Center, East and Southeast Asia, Kasetsart, Bangkok, Thailand
                [ac ]International Center for Agriculture Research in the Dry Areas, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
                [ad ]The Tajik Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Dushanbe, Tajikistan
                [ae ]International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center, El Batan, Mexico
                [af ]Crawford Fund, Canberra, Australia
                [ag ]18, Lorong Geh Chong Keat, Tanjung Bungah, 11200 Penang, Malaysia
                [ah ]Department of Agricultural Research, Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Irrigation, Yezin, Myanmar
                [ai ]Faculty of Economics, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand
                [aj ]University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia
                [ak ]University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
                [al ]Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding, Hebei, China
                [am ]International Fertilizer Development Centre, New Delhi, India
                [an ]Global Evergreening Alliance, Melbourne, Australia
                [ao ]University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author.
                Article
                S0308-521X(21)00121-9 103168
                10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103168
                9584831
                36284566
                90e5cbde-7644-4e76-9da1-83ce441c3155
                © 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                : 2 November 2020
                : 26 April 2021
                : 3 May 2021
                Categories
                Article

                resilience,agrifood-systems,covid-19,gender,markets,policy
                resilience, agrifood-systems, covid-19, gender, markets, policy

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content75

                Cited by16

                Most referenced authors683