16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Disentangling approaches to framing in conflict and negotiation research: A meta-paradigmatic perspective

      , , , , , ,
      Human Relations
      SAGE Publications

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references62

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Framing as a theory of media effects

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A Qualitative Analysis of Conflict Types and Dimensions in Organizational Groups

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The psychology of the unthinkable: taboo trade-offs, forbidden base rates, and heretical counterfactuals.

              Five studies explored cognitive, affective, and behavioral responses to proscribed forms of social cognition. Experiments 1 and 2 revealed that people responded to taboo trade-offs that monetized sacred values with moral outrage and cleansing. Experiments 3 and 4 revealed that racial egalitarians were least likely to use, and angriest at those who did use, race-tainted base rates and that egalitarians who inadvertently used such base rates tried to reaffirm their fair-mindedness. Experiment 5 revealed that Christian fundamentalists were most likely to reject heretical counterfactuals that applied everyday causal schemata to Biblical narratives and to engage in moral cleansing after merely contemplating such possibilities. Although the results fit the sacred-value-protection model (SVPM) better than rival formulations, the SVPM must draw on cross-cultural taxonomies of relational schemata to specify normative boundaries on thought.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Human Relations
                Human Relations
                SAGE Publications
                0018-7267
                1741-282X
                February 2009
                February 2009
                : 62
                : 2
                : 155-193
                Article
                10.1177/0018726708100356
                90a4c424-25ec-467f-a2cd-a1e60f303abc
                © 2009
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article