7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The Edematous and Erythematous Airway Does Not Denote Pathologic Gastroesophageal Reflux

      research-article
      , MD, MPH 1 , , MS 2 , , BS 1 , , MD 3 , , MD 4 , , MD 4
      The Journal of pediatrics

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To determine if the reflux finding score (RFS), a validated score for airway inflammation, correlates with gastroesophageal reflux measured by multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII) testing, endoscopy, and quality of life scores.

          Study design

          We performed a prospective, cross-sectional cohort study of 77 children with chronic cough undergoing direct laryngoscopy and bronchoscopy, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, and MII testing with pH (pH-MII) between 2006 and 2011. Airway examinations were videotaped and reviewed by 3 blinded otolaryngologists each of whom assigned RFS to the airways. RFS were compared with the results of reflux testing (endoscopy, MII, symptom scores). An intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated for the degree of agreement between otolaryngologists’ RFS. Receiver operating characteristic curves were created to determine the sensitivity of the RFS. Spearman correlation was calculated between the RFS and reflux measurements by pH-MII.

          Results

          The mean ± SD RFS was 12 ± 4. There was no correlation between pH-MII variables and mean RFS (|r| < 0.15). The concordance correlation coefficient for RFS between otolaryngologists was low (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.32). Using pH-metry as a gold standard, the positive predictive value for the RFS was 29%. Using MII as the gold standard, the positive predictive value for the RFS was 40%. There was no difference in the mean RFS in patients with (12 ± 4) and without (12 ± 3) esophagitis ( P = .9). There was no correlation between RFS and quality of life scores (|r| < 0.15, P > .3).

          Conclusions

          The RFS cannot predict pathologic gastroesophageal reflux and an airway examination should not be used as a basis for prescribing gastroesophageal reflux therapies.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          0375410
          5127
          J Pediatr
          J Pediatr
          The Journal of pediatrics
          0022-3476
          1097-6833
          30 January 2021
          13 December 2016
          April 2017
          16 February 2021
          : 183
          : 127-131
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Aerodigestive Center, Division of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA;
          [2 ]Clinical Research Center, Children’s Hospital Boston, Boston, MA;
          [3 ]DuPage Children’s Ear, Nose, and Throat and Allergy, Naperville, IL;
          [4 ]Department of Otolaryngology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA
          Author notes
          Reprint requests: Rachel Rosen, MD, Aerodigestive Center, Division of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Boston Children’s Hospital, 300 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115. Rachel.rosen@ 123456childrens.harvard.edu
          Article
          PMC7885125 PMC7885125 7885125 nihpa1666353
          10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.11.035
          7885125
          27979581
          9066107e-b3e5-458e-b1bb-d57a7846aa87
          History
          Categories
          Article

          Comments

          Comment on this article

          scite_
          0
          0
          0
          0
          Smart Citations
          0
          0
          0
          0
          Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
          View Citations

          See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

          scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

          Similar content120

          Cited by6