3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Socioeconomic differences in use of public, occupational and private health care: A register-linkage study of a working-age population in Finland

      research-article
      1 , * , 2
      PLoS ONE
      Public Library of Science

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          There is little knowledge on socioeconomic differences in use of health care organized by different care schemes and on exclusive and concurrent use of health care at different schemes in different socioeconomic groups. In Finland, public, occupational and private schemes offer parallel outpatient primary health care services. Each scheme mainly reaches different population groups because of differences in availability, costs and gatekeeping. This study aimed to analyse how the probability of using health care organized by the three schemes differed by socioeconomic status in a working-age population. Individual-level register-based data on use of public, occupational and private outpatient primary health care during 2013 as well as data on sociodemographic covariates were linked for the total population aged 25–64 of the city of Oulu, Finland. Data were analysed with descriptive methods and multinomial logistic regression models. Those in the study population most often used only occupational care or only public care, or did not use any of the studied health care schemes at all. The lower the socioeconomic status, the higher was the probability of not using care or using only public care. The higher the socioeconomic status, the higher was the probability of using occupational care–either only occupational care or occupational care in combination with private care. Education, occupational class and income were all associated with care use also when adjusted for sociodemographic covariates and chronic disease, but income proved to be the strongest predictor of the three. The results reflect the design of the Finnish health care system, with a strong occupational health care scheme for the employed population contributing to inequality in use of health care and potentially to health inequality between socioeconomic groups.

          Related collections

          Most cited references16

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Inequalities in access to medical care by income in developed countries.

          Most of the member countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) aim to ensure equitable access to health care. This is often interpreted as requiring that care be available on the basis of need and not willingness or ability to pay. We sought to examine equity in physician utilization in 21 OECD countries for the year 2000. Using data from national surveys or from the European Community Household Panel, we extracted the number of visits to a general practitioner or medical specialist over the previous 12 months. Visits were standardized for need differences using age, sex and reported health levels as proxies. We measured inequity in doctor utilization by income using concentration indices of the need-standardized use. We found inequity in physician utilization favouring patients who are better off in about half of the OECD countries studied. The degree of pro-rich inequity in doctor use is highest in the United States and Mexico, followed by Finland, Portugal and Sweden. In most countries, we found no evidence of inequity in the distribution of general practitioner visits across income groups, and where it does occur, it often indicates a pro-poor distribution. However, in all countries for which data are available, after controlling for need differences, people with higher incomes are significantly more likely to see a specialist than people with lower incomes and, in most countries, also more frequently. Pro-rich inequity is especially large in Portugal, Finland and Ireland. Although in most OECD countries general practitioner care is distributed fairly equally and is often even pro-poor, the very pro-rich distribution of specialist care tends to make total doctor utilization somewhat pro-rich. This phenomenon appears to be universal, but it is reinforced when private insurance or private care options are offered.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Equity of access to health care: outlining the foundations for action.

            The Ministers of Health from Chile, Germany, Greece, New Zealand, Slovenia, Sweden, and the United Kingdom recently established The International Forum on Common Access to Health Care Services, based on a common belief that their citizens should enjoy universal and equitable access to good quality health care. The ministers intend to form a network to share thinking and evidence on health care improvements, with the specific aim of sustaining and promoting equitable access to health care. Despite a vast literature on the notion of equity of access, little agreement has been reached in the literature on exactly what this notion ought to mean. This article provides a brief description of the relevance of the access principle of equity, and summarises the research programme that is necessary for turning the principle into a useful, operational policy objective.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Using the margins command to estimate and interpret adjusted predictions and marginal effects

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Formal analysisRole: MethodologyRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                16 April 2020
                2020
                : 15
                : 4
                : e0231792
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Research Unit, The Social Insurance Institution of Finland (Kela), Helsinki, Finland
                [2 ] Research Unit, The Social Insurance Institution of Finland (Kela), Turku, Finland
                Charles Sturt University, AUSTRALIA
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5466-0205
                Article
                PONE-D-20-01677
                10.1371/journal.pone.0231792
                7162494
                32298356
                904a0730-fbbf-4e4f-adcc-e1b0b26f3723
                © 2020 Blomgren, Virta

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 18 January 2020
                : 31 March 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 3, Pages: 18
                Funding
                The authors received no specific funding for this work.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Health Care
                Socioeconomic Aspects of Health
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Public and Occupational Health
                Socioeconomic Aspects of Health
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Public and Occupational Health
                Social Sciences
                Economics
                Labor Economics
                Employment
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Health Care
                Health Care Providers
                People and places
                Geographical locations
                Europe
                European Union
                Finland
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Health Care
                Patients
                Outpatients
                People and Places
                Population Groupings
                Ethnicities
                European People
                Finnish People
                Social Sciences
                Economics
                Health Economics
                Health Insurance
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Health Care
                Health Economics
                Health Insurance
                Custom metadata
                Due to legal restrictions and data protection regulations of the administrative sources providing individual-level register data, the authors do not have the permission to make sensitive personal data available. Interested parties may apply for permissions to access the data from the centralized data permit authority Findata ( https://www.findata.fi/en/), info@ 123456findata.fi , tel. +358295246500.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article