0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Evaluation of NG-Test CARBA 5 for the detection of carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative bacilli

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) pose one of the most serious antimicrobial resistance threats to public health worldwide. The outcome of CPE infection differs depending on the resistance mechanism. Therefore, rapid detection of CPE infection is essential for optimizing patient management. The carbapenem inactivation method (CIM) and modified CIM (mCIM) are standard methods for detecting CPE, but they usually require 24 h to generate results.

          Recently, an immunochromatographic assay, NG-Test CARBA 5, has become commercially available. It detects the five most common carbapenemase producers (KPC, IMP, NDM, VIM, and OXA-48) rapidly and accurately.

          We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of NG-Test CARBA 5 for detecting carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative bacilli (CPGNB).

          We used 116 carbapenemase-producing strains and 48 non-carbapenemase-producing strains. Of the 116 carbapenemase-producing strains, 107 harboured genes for at least one of the five most common carbapenemases, KPC, IMP, NDM, VIM, and OXA-48-like. Forty-eight non-carbapenemase-producing strains, including carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales , harboured genes for extended-spectrum β-lactamases (CTX-M groups [ n=25] and SHV groups [ n=2]) or plasmid-mediated AmpC β-lactamases (DHA [ n=3], CMY-2 [ n=2], and CFE-1 [ n=1]). Antimicrobial susceptibility was tested using the agar dilution method, according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines.

          Of the 116 carbapenemase-producing strains, 79 were resistant to at least meropenem or imipenem. The sensitivity and specificity of the NG-Test CARBA 5 for the strains were 99.1 % (106 strains positive for 107 strains of the five most common carbapenemase producers) and 100 % (60 strains negative for other types of CPGNB [ n=10] and non-CPGNB strains [ n=48]), respectively. The carbapenemase-producing strain with a false-negative result produced IMP-66.

          The NG-Test CARBA 5 had high sensitivity and specificity for detecting carbapenemase-producing strains.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Development of a set of multiplex PCR assays for the detection of genes encoding important beta-lactamases in Enterobacteriaceae.

          To develop a rapid and reliable tool to detect by multiplex PCR assays the most frequently widespread beta-lactamase genes encoding the OXA-1-like broad-spectrum beta-lactamases, extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs), plasmid-mediated AmpC beta-lactamases and class A, B and D carbapenemases. Following the design of a specific group of primers and optimization using control strains, a set of six multiplex PCRs and one simplex PCR was created. An evaluation of the set was performed using a collection of 31 Enterobacteriaceae strains isolated from clinical specimens showing a resistance phenotype towards broad-spectrum cephalosporins and/or cephamycins and/or carbapenems. Direct sequencing from PCR products was subsequently carried out to identify beta-lactamase genes. Under optimized conditions, all positive controls confirmed the specificity of group-specific PCR primers. Except for the detection of carbapenemase genes, multiplex and simplex PCR assays were carried out using the same PCR conditions, allowing assays to be performed in a single run. Out of 31 isolates selected, 22 strains produced an ESBL, mostly CTX-M-15 but also CTX-M-1 and CTX-M-9, SHV-12, SHV-5, SHV-2, TEM-21, TEM-52 and a VEB-type ESBL, 6 strains produced a plasmid-mediated AmpC beta-lactamase (five DHA-1 and one CMY-2) and 3 strains produced both an ESBL (two SHV-12, one CTX-M-15) and a plasmid-mediated AmpC beta-lactamase (DHA-1). We report here the development of a useful method composed of a set of six multiplex PCRs and one simplex PCR for the rapid screening of the most frequently encountered beta-lactamases. This method allowed direct sequencing from the PCR products.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Multiplex PCR for detection of acquired carbapenemase genes.

            A rapid and reliable PCR-based technique was developed for detection of genes encoding carbapenemases belonging to different classes. Primers were designed to amplify the following 11 genes: bla(IMP), bla(VIM), bla(NDM), bla(SPM), bla(AIM), bla(DIM), bla(GIM), bla(SIM)bla(KPC), bla(BIC), and bla(OXA-48). Three different multiplex reaction mixtures were defined and evaluated for the detection of all these 11 genes. Using optimized conditions, each reaction mixture allowed to identify the respective genes, with PCR giving distinct amplicon sizes corresponding to the different genes for each mixture. We reported here a rapid and reliable technique for screening all clinically relevant carbapenemase genes. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Modified Carbapenem Inactivation Method for Phenotypic Detection of Carbapenemase Production among Enterobacteriaceae

              The ability of clinical microbiology laboratories to reliably detect carbapenemase-producing carbapenem-resistant (CP-CRE) is an important element of the effort to prevent and contain the spread of these pathogens and an integral part of antimicrobial stewardship. All existing methods have limitations. A new, straightforward, inexpensive, and specific phenotypic method for the detection of carbapenemase production, the carbapenem inactivation method (CIM), was recently described. Here we describe a two-stage evaluation of a modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM), in which tryptic soy broth was substituted for water during the inactivation step and the length of this incubation was extended. A validation study was performed in a single clinical laboratory to determine the accuracy of the mCIM, followed by a nine-laboratory study to verify the reproducibility of these results and define the zone size cutoff that best discriminated between CP-CRE and members of the family that do not produce carbapenemases. Bacterial isolates previously characterized through whole-genome sequencing or targeted PCR as to the presence or absence of carbapenemase genes were tested for carbapenemase production using the mCIM; isolates with Ambler class A, B, and D carbapenemases, non-CP-CRE isolates, and carbapenem-susceptible isolates were included. The sensitivity of the mCIM observed in the validation study was 99% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 93% to 100%), and the specificity was 100% (95% CI, 82% to 100%). In the second stage of the study, the range of sensitivities observed across nine laboratories was 93% to 100%, with a mean of 97%; the range of specificities was 97% to 100%, with a mean of 99%. The mCIM was easy to perform and interpret for , with results in less than 24 h and excellent reproducibility across laboratories.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Journal of Medical Microbiology
                Microbiology Society
                0022-2615
                1473-5644
                June 07 2022
                June 07 2022
                : 71
                : 6
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan
                Article
                10.1099/jmm.0.001557
                90477fdc-fca1-4935-a2ad-76337453fd7e
                © 2022
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content206

                Cited by4

                Most referenced authors162