9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Cardiorespiratory fitness is a strong and consistent predictor of morbidity and mortality among adults: an overview of meta-analyses representing over 20.9 million observations from 199 unique cohort studies

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To examine and summarise evidence from meta-analyses of cohort studies that evaluated the predictive associations between baseline cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and health outcomes among adults.

          Design

          Overview of systematic reviews.

          Data source

          Five bibliographic databases were searched from January 2002 to March 2024.

          Results

          From the 9062 papers identified, we included 26 systematic reviews. We found eight meta-analyses that described five unique mortality outcomes among general populations. CRF had the largest risk reduction for all-cause mortality when comparing high versus low CRF (HR=0.47; 95% CI 0.39 to 0.56). A dose–response relationship for every 1-metabolic equivalent of task (MET) higher level of CRF was associated with a 11%–17% reduction in all-cause mortality (HR=0.89; 95% CI 0.86 to 0.92, and HR=0.83; 95% CI 0.78 to 0.88). For incident outcomes, nine meta-analyses described 12 unique outcomes. CRF was associated with the largest risk reduction in incident heart failure when comparing high versus low CRF (HR=0.31; 95% CI 0.19 to 0.49). A dose–response relationship for every 1-MET higher level of CRF was associated with a 18% reduction in heart failure (HR=0.82; 95% CI 0.79 to 0.84). Among those living with chronic conditions, nine meta-analyses described four unique outcomes in nine patient groups. CRF was associated with the largest risk reduction for cardiovascular mortality among those living with cardiovascular disease when comparing high versus low CRF (HR=0.27; 95% CI 0.16 to 0.48). The certainty of the evidence across all studies ranged from very low-to-moderate according to Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations.

          Conclusion

          We found consistent evidence that high CRF is strongly associated with lower risk for a variety of mortality and incident chronic conditions in general and clinical populations.

          Related collections

          Most cited references69

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both

            The number of published systematic reviews of studies of healthcare interventions has increased rapidly and these are used extensively for clinical and policy decisions. Systematic reviews are subject to a range of biases and increasingly include non-randomised studies of interventions. It is important that users can distinguish high quality reviews. Many instruments have been designed to evaluate different aspects of reviews, but there are few comprehensive critical appraisal instruments. AMSTAR was developed to evaluate systematic reviews of randomised trials. In this paper, we report on the updating of AMSTAR and its adaptation to enable more detailed assessment of systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. With moves to base more decisions on real world observational evidence we believe that AMSTAR 2 will assist decision makers in the identification of high quality systematic reviews, including those based on non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise.

              The purpose of this Position Stand is to provide guidance to professionals who counsel and prescribe individualized exercise to apparently healthy adults of all ages. These recommendations also may apply to adults with certain chronic diseases or disabilities, when appropriately evaluated and advised by a health professional. This document supersedes the 1998 American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) Position Stand, "The Recommended Quantity and Quality of Exercise for Developing and Maintaining Cardiorespiratory and Muscular Fitness, and Flexibility in Healthy Adults." The scientific evidence demonstrating the beneficial effects of exercise is indisputable, and the benefits of exercise far outweigh the risks in most adults. A program of regular exercise that includes cardiorespiratory, resistance, flexibility, and neuromotor exercise training beyond activities of daily living to improve and maintain physical fitness and health is essential for most adults. The ACSM recommends that most adults engage in moderate-intensity cardiorespiratory exercise training for ≥30 min·d on ≥5 d·wk for a total of ≥150 min·wk, vigorous-intensity cardiorespiratory exercise training for ≥20 min·d on ≥3 d·wk (≥75 min·wk), or a combination of moderate- and vigorous-intensity exercise to achieve a total energy expenditure of ≥500-1000 MET·min·wk. On 2-3 d·wk, adults should also perform resistance exercises for each of the major muscle groups, and neuromotor exercise involving balance, agility, and coordination. Crucial to maintaining joint range of movement, completing a series of flexibility exercises for each the major muscle-tendon groups (a total of 60 s per exercise) on ≥2 d·wk is recommended. The exercise program should be modified according to an individual's habitual physical activity, physical function, health status, exercise responses, and stated goals. Adults who are unable or unwilling to meet the exercise targets outlined here still can benefit from engaging in amounts of exercise less than recommended. In addition to exercising regularly, there are health benefits in concurrently reducing total time engaged in sedentary pursuits and also by interspersing frequent, short bouts of standing and physical activity between periods of sedentary activity, even in physically active adults. Behaviorally based exercise interventions, the use of behavior change strategies, supervision by an experienced fitness instructor, and exercise that is pleasant and enjoyable can improve adoption and adherence to prescribed exercise programs. Educating adults about and screening for signs and symptoms of CHD and gradual progression of exercise intensity and volume may reduce the risks of exercise. Consultations with a medical professional and diagnostic exercise testing for CHD are useful when clinically indicated but are not recommended for universal screening to enhance the safety of exercise.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Br J Sports Med
                Br J Sports Med
                bjsports
                bjsm
                British Journal of Sports Medicine
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                0306-3674
                1473-0480
                May 2024
                9 April 2024
                : 58
                : 10
                : 556-566
                Affiliations
                [1 ] departmentCentre for Surveillance and Applied Research , Ringgold_41687Public Health Agency of Canada , Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
                [2 ] departmentSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine , Ringgold_6363University of Ottawa , Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
                [3 ] departmentAlliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity (ARENA), Allied Health and Human Performance , University of South Australia , Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
                [4 ] departmentHealth Library , Ringgold_6348Health Canada , Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
                [5 ] departmentDepartment of Physical Education and Sports, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Sport and Health University Research Institute (iMUDS) , Ringgold_16741University of Granada; CIBEROBN, ISCIII , Granada, Andalucía, Spain
                [6 ] Stanford University, Department of Cardiology; and Veterans Affair Palo Alto Health Care System , Palo Alto, California, USA
                [7 ] Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute , Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
                [8 ] departmentDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine , University of Ottawa , Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
                [9 ] departmentMenzies Institute for Medical Research , Ringgold_3925University of Tasmania , Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
                [10 ] departmentDivision of Medical Sciences , Ringgold_6727University of Northern British Columbia , Prince George, British Columbia, Canada
                [11 ] Fargo VA Healthcare System , Fargo, North Dakota, USA
                [12 ] departmentDepartment of Health, Nutrition, and Exercise Sciences , North Dakota State University , Fargo, North Dakota, USA
                [13 ] departmentDepartment of Geriatrics , University of North Dakota , Grand Forks, North Dakota, USA
                [14 ] departmentFaculty of Sport and Health Sciences , University of Jyväskylä , Jyväskylä, Finland
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr Justin J Lang, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Canada; justin.lang@ 123456phac-aspc.gc.ca

                JJL and SAP are joint first authors.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1768-319X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6729-5649
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4513-9108
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5607-5736
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1752-5431
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5461-5981
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2001-1121
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7227-2406
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7601-9670
                Article
                bjsports-2023-107849
                10.1136/bjsports-2023-107849
                11103301
                38599681
                900e0738-2093-4388-b821-31a9f083af97
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See:  http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 18 March 2024
                Categories
                Systematic Review
                1506
                2314
                1767
                Custom metadata
                unlocked
                true

                Sports medicine
                cardiovascular diseases,review,cohort studies,physical fitness
                Sports medicine
                cardiovascular diseases, review, cohort studies, physical fitness

                Comments

                Comment on this article