Several chemical
and particulate
species have been designated as contaminants of emerging concern (CECs)
due to their persistence in the environment, their detrimental effects
on human health and ecosystems, and their lack of current regulations.
According to the definitions provided by the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) and the United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP),
CECs encompass various substances, including industrial additives
such as per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), pharmaceuticals
and personal care products (PPCPs), and microplastics.
1
These CECs have been detected around the globe in previously
pristine environments that were once considered untouched by human
influence, such as remote high-elevation mountain areas, Arctic air,
snowpack, and the open ocean.
1,2
Similar to greenhouse
gases, CECs pose a pervasive threat to all regions of the world.
Monitoring the levels of CECs in the air, land, and water is challenging
due to the lack of a standardized methodology for collection and analysis
and uncertainty surrounding the effectiveness of regulations. Thus,
a crucial question is raised. Is the current approach, which relies
on nonstandardized measurements and reporting of CECs, effective in
gaining widespread public support for reduction targets? Without clear
indications that such policies are leading to reduced levels of CECs,
we must consider the need for standardization. In this work, we contend
that the standardization of methodologies and consistent reporting
of CEC concentrations over time, both at a single reference measurement
site and across different environmental compartments, will be essential
in comprehending the science behind CECs in the environment and guiding
future policy decisions.
The challenges of method standardization
and policy action to reduce
CEC concentrations can be likened to the historical challenge of measuring
and reporting global atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide
(CO2), a greenhouse gas, before the establishment of the
renowned Keeling curve in the 1950s.
3
This
curve graphically displays the long-term increase and seasonal variations
of CO2 in the atmosphere. Prior to the Keeling curve, measurements
of CO2 were conducted inconsistently using various analytical
techniques and locations, resulting in less reliable data for monitoring
global averages and trends over time. The creation of the curve and
its effectiveness in promoting international collaboration on climate
policy were based on two fundamental principles: (1) the development
and widespread adoption of a single instrument, the gas manometer,
and (2) the meticulous selection of a reference measurement site.
We demonstrate how the principles that underpinned the construction
of the Keeling curve and its ongoing success in fostering international
collaboration can be applied to the monitoring, reporting, and implementation
of policies concerning CECs. To draw a parallel, we focus on the pressing
issue of airborne microplastic pollution, which serves as a representative
CEC found in all environmental compartments. Microplastics are a prominent
topic leading up to the anticipated UN Plastics Treaty scheduled for
2024, which aims to establish a legally binding agreement to “End
Plastic Pollution”.
4
Various
techniques are currently employed to analyze microplastic
particles in the air. Some rely on single-particle counting paired
with spectroscopic techniques for identifying plastic chemical signatures;
however, these often have a limited size resolution. Conversely, there
are promising methods capable of quantifying the constituent polymers
of the plastic in nearly real time, with detection capabilities down
to the picogram level.
100
These techniques
differ in their physical and chemical resolution and are inconsistently
applied across different monitoring sites.
There are limitations
to relying on different techniques when quantifying
airborne microplastics over time (Figure 1
). Due to the lack of consistent measurements,
there are no discernible trends over time, and there is significant
variability within and between rural and urban locations. Similar
graphs can be constructed for other microplastics and CECs measured
in different environmental compartments. Thus, implementing a live
and continuously updated graph that charts the concentrations of airborne
microplastics over time, akin to the iconic Keeling curve for CO2, holds significant
potential as a powerful tool in addressing
the issue of microplastic pollution. This proposed solution, applicable
to all CECs, consists of two critical steps that mirror the principles
on which the Keeling curve was founded: (1) the adoption of a standardized
technique for continuous online monitoring and (2) the identification
of a representative measurement site, similar to the Mauna Loa observatory
for monitoring CO2, and the creation of a global sampling
map that acknowledges regional variability. This is crucial as microplastics
and other CECs are not as long-lived or as uniformly distributed in
the environment as greenhouse gases like CO2. One such
potential measurement site for airborne microplastics is the Pic du
Midi observatory in the pristine French Pyrenees, which experiences
the impact of intercontinental transport of airborne microplastics.
13
Additionally, dedicated networks like the U.S.
EPA’s National Air Toxics Trends Sites (NATTS) have been consistently
monitoring hazardous air pollutants in the United States since its
establishment in 2003. Similar networks and reference sites should
be established to monitor CECs in terrestrial, atmospheric, and aquatic
environments.
Figure 1
Illustration demonstrating challenges in interpreting
global trends
of concentrations of contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) based
on current monitoring approaches, using airborne microplastics as
a representative example. Number concentrations of airborne microplastics
over time, as currently analyzed using various methods and measurement
sites (left).
5−12
Anticipated outcomes from using a standardized method at a reference
measurement site (right). The red arrow represents an expected upward
trend in the concentration of airborne microplastics if the 2024 UN
Plastics Treaty is not successful, while the green line represents
an expected downward trend if the treaty is successful.
Although there is currently no single technique
capable of
unambiguously
identifying and quantifying all types of CECs in various environmental
compartments, it is crucial for the international scientific community
to reach a consensus on a standardized technique suitable for specific
CECs and matrices. For airborne microplastics, techniques that directly
quantify the constituent polymers in a mass-based format, eliminating
biases in counting techniques, would reduce instances of human error
and particle count inflation caused by plastic breakdown in the environment.
Moreover, these techniques would allow for the timely dissemination
of a large volume of results. This standardized approach will ensure
accurate and verified comparisons between measurements over time and
enable the tracking of progress in reducing the levels of CECs in
the environment. Such trends can be illustrated to assess the efficacy
of policy action, as shown for airborne microplastics in Figure 1
.
Persistent
environmental CECs, such as plastic, which is widely
used in daily life, have the potential to endure for hundreds of years,
or even indefinitely.
14
Given this sobering
reality, it becomes crucial to meticulously measure their background
concentrations across all environmental compartments in a standardized
manner to fully grasp the long-lasting effects of such pollution.
The development of a standardized and easily understandable graph,
similar to the Keeling curve, has the potential to serve as a powerful
catalyst for global action against CECs. By taking these necessary
steps, we can provide a clear and comprehensive road map for stakeholders
to track progress toward policy objectives. Such a graph has the potential
to inspire international collaboration as an effective response to
this pressing issue.