Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Affective Neuroscience of Sexuality: Development of a LUST Scale

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          In recent years, there have been many studies using the Affective Neuroscience Personality Scales (ANPS) to investigate individual differences in primary emotion traits. However, in contrast to other primary emotion traits proposed by Jaak Panksepp and colleagues, there is a considerable lack of research on the LUST (L) dimension – defined as an individual’s capacity to attain sexual desire and satisfaction – a circumstance mainly caused by its exclusion from the ANPS. Therefore, this study aims to take a first step toward the development of a standardized self-rate measurement for the L-disposition. For this purpose, two versions of the L-scales (L-12 and L-5) were developed and evaluated regarding reliability and aspects of validity.

          Materials and Methods

          After a pilot study ( N = 204; female: 81%) with an initial 20-item pool item reductions were conducted. This led to the construction of a 12-item (L-12) version and a 5-item version (L-5), which were assessed in a second sample consisting of 371 German-speaking healthy adults (58.50% female) aged 18–69 years ( M = 28; SD = 9.75). Aspects of external validity were assessed by investigation of correlations with the ANPS, psychiatric symptoms (Brief Symptom Inventory-18), attachment security (Adult Attachment Scales) and personality functioning (Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnostics Structure Questionnaire). To evaluate structural validity, both L-scales were investigated via confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).

          Results

          Cronbach’s α indicated excellent internal consistency regarding L-12 (α = 0.90), while L-5 showed acceptable reliability (α = 0.82). CFA of a bifactor model of the L-12 indicated excellent model fit. Moreover, an excellent model fit was observed regarding a single factor model of L-5. For both scales small to moderate positive correlations were observed with SEEKING, PLAY, and secure attachment, while they exhibited small to moderate negative correlations with SADNESS, insecure attachment, lower personality functioning, and increased psychiatric symptom load.

          Conclusion

          Both newly developed scales exhibit satisfying psychometric properties, indicating high reliability, good structural validity and plausible correlations with external criteria. Hence, this study poses an important step toward the operationalization of the LUST concept. However, more research is needed in particular with respect to the scale’s external validity and its applicability in clinical populations.

          Related collections

          Most cited references54

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Book: not found

            Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, Fourth Edition

            Emphasizing concepts and rationale over mathematical minutiae, this is the most widely used, complete, and accessible structural equation modeling (SEM) text. Continuing the tradition of using real data examples from a variety of disciplines, the significantly revised fourth edition incorporates recent developments such as Pearl's graphing theory and the structural causal model (SCM), measurement invariance, and more. Readers gain a comprehensive understanding of all phases of SEM, from data collection and screening to the interpretation and reporting of the results. Learning is enhanced by exercises with answers, rules to remember, and topic boxes. The companion website supplies data, syntax, and output for the book's examples--now including files for Amos, EQS, LISREL, Mplus, Stata, and R (lavaan).<br><br> New to This Edition<br> *Extensively revised to cover important new topics: Pearl's graphing theory and the SCM, causal inference frameworks, conditional process modeling, path models for longitudinal data, item response theory, and more.<br> *Chapters on best practices in all stages of SEM, measurement invariance in confirmatory factor analysis, and significance testing issues and bootstrapping.<br> *Expanded coverage of psychometrics.<br> *Additional computer tools: online files for all detailed examples, previously provided in EQS, LISREL, and Mplus, are now also given in Amos, Stata, and R (lavaan).<br> *Reorganized to cover the specification, identification, and analysis of observed variable models separately from latent variable models.<br><br> Pedagogical Features<br> *Exercises with answers, plus end-of-chapter annotated lists of further reading.<br> *Real examples of troublesome data, demonstrating how to handle typical problems in analyses.<br> *Topic boxes on specialized issues, such as causes of nonpositive definite correlations.<br> *Boxed rules to remember.<br> *Website promoting a learn-by-doing approach, including syntax and data files for six widely used SEM computer tools.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Pleasure systems in the brain.

              Pleasure is mediated by well-developed mesocorticolimbic circuitry and serves adaptive functions. In affective disorders, anhedonia (lack of pleasure) or dysphoria (negative affect) can result from breakdowns of that hedonic system. Human neuroimaging studies indicate that surprisingly similar circuitry is activated by quite diverse pleasures, suggesting a common neural currency shared by all. Wanting for reward is generated by a large and distributed brain system. Liking, or pleasure itself, is generated by a smaller set of hedonic hot spots within limbic circuitry. Those hot spots also can be embedded in broader anatomical patterns of valence organization, such as in a keyboard pattern of nucleus accumbens generators for desire versus dread. In contrast, some of the best known textbook candidates for pleasure generators, including classic pleasure electrodes and the mesolimbic dopamine system, may not generate pleasure after all. These emerging insights into brain pleasure mechanisms may eventually facilitate better treatments for affective disorders.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Hum Neurosci
                Front Hum Neurosci
                Front. Hum. Neurosci.
                Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1662-5161
                28 February 2022
                2022
                : 16
                : 853706
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Center for Integrative Addiction Research, Grüner Kreis Society , Vienna, Austria
                [2] 2Department of Philosophy, University of Vienna , Vienna, Austria
                [3] 3University Clinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapeutic Medicine, Medical University of Graz , Graz, Austria
                [4] 4Department of Psychology, University of Graz , Graz, Austria
                [5] 5Clinical Psychology and Behavioral Neuroscience, Technische Universität Dresden , Dresden, Germany
                [6] 6University Department of Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Medical University Graz , Graz, Austria
                [7] 7Department of Religious Studies, University of Vienna , Vienna, Austria
                Author notes

                Edited by: Christoph Mathys, Aarhus University, Denmark

                Reviewed by: Andrea Clarici, University of Trieste, Italy; Geir Pedersen, Oslo University Hospital, Norway

                *Correspondence: Jürgen Fuchshuber, a00913689@ 123456unet.univie.ac.at
                Human Friedrich Unterrainer, human.unterrainer@ 123456univie.ac.at

                This article was submitted to Cognitive Neuroscience, a section of the journal Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

                Article
                10.3389/fnhum.2022.853706
                8918489
                35295884
                8ff3d537-0dbc-4cca-9630-72379e4e7091
                Copyright © 2022 Fuchshuber, Jauk, Hiebler-Ragger and Unterrainer.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 12 January 2022
                : 07 February 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 4, Equations: 0, References: 55, Pages: 10, Words: 7066
                Categories
                Human Neuroscience
                Original Research

                Neurosciences
                lust,questionnaire development,factor analysis,primary emotions,affective neuroscience

                Comments

                Comment on this article