8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Chorioallantoic Membrane Models of Various Avian Species: Differences and Applications

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Simple Summary

          The chorioallantoic membrane of an avian embryo is a simple, low-cost, low-maintenance, and well-available in vivo animal model with many advantages in the field of scientific experimentation and a multitude of ways of its application. Our review addresses the avian species that are less known as suitable for the chorioallantoic membrane model (CAM) assay than the most commonly used chicken embryo. We describe and compare the characteristics of the quail, turkey, and duck CAM assays, each species offering different advantages for research and opening more possibilities for working methods.

          Abstract

          The chorioallantoic membrane model (CAM) of an avian embryo is used as an experimental model in various fields of research, including angiogenesis research and drug testing, xenografting and cancer research, and other scientific and commercial disciplines in microbiology, biochemistry, cosmetics, etc. It is a low-cost, low-maintenance, and well-available in vivo animal model that is non-sentient and can be used as an alternative for other mammal experimental models. It respects the principles of the “3R” rule (Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement)—conditions set out for scientific community providing an essential framework for conducting a more human animal research, which is also in line with constantly raising public awareness of welfare and the ethics related to the use of animal experimental models. In this review, we describe the chorioallantoic membrane of an avian embryo, focusing on its properties and development, its advantages and disadvantages as an experimental model, and the possibilities of its application in various fields of biological research. Since the most common chicken CAM model is already well known and described in many publications, we are particularly focusing on the advantages and application of less known avian species that are used for the CAM model—quail, turkey, and duck.

          Related collections

          Most cited references150

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. 1951.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Consensus guidelines for the use and interpretation of angiogenesis assays

            The formation of new blood vessels, or angiogenesis, is a complex process that plays important roles in growth and development, tissue and organ regeneration, as well as numerous pathological conditions. Angiogenesis undergoes multiple discrete steps that can be individually evaluated and quantified by a large number of bioassays. These independent assessments hold advantages but also have limitations. This article describes in vivo, ex vivo, and in vitro bioassays that are available for the evaluation of angiogenesis and highlights critical aspects that are relevant for their execution and proper interpretation. As such, this collaborative work is the first edition of consensus guidelines on angiogenesis bioassays to serve for current and future reference.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Mechanisms in photodynamic therapy: part one-photosensitizers, photochemistry and cellular localization.

              The use of non-toxic dyes or photosensitizers (PS) in combination with harmless visible light that is known as photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been known for over a hundred years, but is only now becoming widely used. Originally developed as a tumor therapy, some of its most successful applications are for non-malignant disease. In a series of three reviews we will discuss the mechanisms that operate in the field of PDT. Part one discusses the recent explosion in discovery and chemical synthesis of new PS. Some guidelines on how to choose an ideal PS for a particular application are presented. The photochemistry and photophysics of PS and the two pathways known as Type I (radicals and reactive oxygen species) and Type II (singlet oxygen) photochemical processes are discussed. To carry out PDT effectively in vivo, it is necessary to ensure sufficient light reaches all the diseased tissue. This involves understanding how light travels within various tissues and the relative effects of absorption and scattering. The fact that most of the PS are also fluorescent allows various optical imaging and monitoring strategies to be combined with PDT. The most important factor governing the outcome of PDT is how the PS interacts with cells in the target tissue or tumor, and the key aspect of this interaction is the subcellular localization of the PS. Examples of PS that localize in mitochondria, lysosomes, endoplasmic reticulum, Golgi apparatus and plasma membranes are given. Finally the use of 5-aminolevulinic acid as a natural precursor of the heme biosynthetic pathway, stimulates accumulation of the PS protoporphyrin IX is described.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                Biology (Basel)
                Biology (Basel)
                biology
                Biology
                MDPI
                2079-7737
                06 April 2021
                April 2021
                : 10
                : 4
                : 301
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Institute of Animal Biochemistry and Genetics, CBs SAS, 840 05 Bratislava, Slovakia; mariana.macajova@ 123456savba.sk (M.M.); majlinda.meta@ 123456savba.sk (M.M.); ivan.cavarga@ 123456savba.sk (I.Č.); boris.bilcik@ 123456savba.sk (B.B.)
                [2 ]St. Elizabeth Cancer Institute, 812 50 Bratislava, Slovakia
                Author notes
                Article
                biology-10-00301
                10.3390/biology10040301
                8067367
                33917385
                8febab99-4a0e-4c61-9a4b-eba9d7e542e8
                © 2021 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 15 March 2021
                : 01 April 2021
                Categories
                Review

                chorioallantoic membrane,quail,turkey,duck,3r
                chorioallantoic membrane, quail, turkey, duck, 3r

                Comments

                Comment on this article