9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Untenable Expectations: Nurses’ Work in the Context of Medication Administration, Error, and the Organization

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We explored nurses’ work in the context of medication administration, errors, and the organization. Secondary analysis of ethnographic data included 92 hours of non-participant observation, and 37 unstructured interviews with nurses, administrators, and pharmacists. Think-aloud observations and analysis of institutional documents supplemented these data. Findings revealed the nature of nurses’ work was characterized by chasing a standard of care, prioritizing practice, and renegotiating routines. The rich description identified characteristics of nurses’ work as cyclical, chaotic and complex shattering studies that explained nurses’ work as linear. A new theoretical model was developed, illustrating the inseparability of nurses’ work from contextual contingencies and enhancing our understanding of the cascading components of work that result in days that spin out of the nurses’ control. These results deepen our understanding why present efforts targeting the reduction of medication errors may be ineffective and places administration accountable for the context in which medication errors occur.

          Related collections

          Most cited references64

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Critical Analysis of Strategies for Determining Rigor in Qualitative Inquiry.

          Criteria for determining the trustworthiness of qualitative research were introduced by Guba and Lincoln in the 1980s when they replaced terminology for achieving rigor, reliability, validity, and generalizability with dependability, credibility, and transferability. Strategies for achieving trustworthiness were also introduced. This landmark contribution to qualitative research remains in use today, with only minor modifications in format. Despite the significance of this contribution over the past four decades, the strategies recommended to achieve trustworthiness have not been critically examined. Recommendations for where, why, and how to use these strategies have not been developed, and how well they achieve their intended goal has not been examined. We do not know, for example, what impact these strategies have on the completed research. In this article, I critique these strategies. I recommend that qualitative researchers return to the terminology of social sciences, using rigor, reliability, validity, and generalizability. I then make recommendations for the appropriate use of the strategies recommended to achieve rigor: prolonged engagement, persistent observation, and thick, rich description; inter-rater reliability, negative case analysis; peer review or debriefing; clarifying researcher bias; member checking; external audits; and triangulation.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Verification Strategies for Establishing Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Human error: models and management.

              J. Reason (2000)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Glob Qual Nurs Res
                Glob Qual Nurs Res
                GQN
                spgqn
                Global Qualitative Nursing Research
                SAGE Publications (Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA )
                2333-3936
                13 November 2022
                Jan-Dec 2022
                : 9
                : 23333936221131779
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Eastern Idaho Regional Medical Center, Idaho Falls, USA
                [2 ]University of Utah, College of Nursing, Salt Lake City, USA
                Author notes
                [*]Sara F. Hawkins, Director of Patient Safety & Risk, Eastern Idaho Regional Medical Center, 3100 Channing Way, Idaho Falls, ID 83404, USA. Email: sara.hawkins@ 123456hcahealthcare.com
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9590-3576
                Article
                10.1177_23333936221131779
                10.1177/23333936221131779
                9663611
                36387044
                8fc21d8d-f07c-4d28-984e-bc1c46e2c6d9
                © 2022 The Author(s)

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                : 11 April 2022
                : 16 September 2022
                : 23 September 2022
                Categories
                Single-Method Research Article
                Custom metadata
                January-December 2022
                ts1

                ethnography,medication errors,models (theoretical),nurses,patient safety,northwestern united states

                Comments

                Comment on this article